MITIGASI BENCANA BERBASIS SENSITIVE GENDER
Abstrak
Dampak yang ditimbulkan oleh bencana berbeda berdaskarkan kepada perbedaan kebutuhan dan kondisi gender. Upaya untuk mengurangi dampak dari bencana tersebut dilakukan melalui serangkain kegiatan yang terstruktur dan terintegrasi melalui mitigasi. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menkonseptualisasikan mitigasi bencana yang memperhatikan kebutuhan gender melalui pendekatan sensitive gender. Metode penelitian ini yaitu studi literatur dengan menggunakan kajian-kajian empiris dan teoritis terkait dengan mitigasi bencana dan sensitive gender. Hasil penelitian membagi mitigasi bencana yang sensitive gender menjadi dua yaitu berdasarkan kepada kebutuhan strategis dan kebutuhan praktis. Kebutuhan strategis meliputi peningkatan kekuatan perempuan dalam pengambilan keputusan, peningkatan keberhakan terhadap posisi kepemimpinan, akses yang setara ke pekerjaan hak-hak hukum yang setara, serta perlindungan dari kekerasan, hak-hak reproduksi, peningkatan mobilitas. Sedangkan kebutuhan praktis yaitu Gathering gender-sensitive data, Legal infrastructure, Physical infrastructure, Human development, Insurance, Knowledge dissemination, Early Warning, Shelter, Aid Distribution dan Aid Composition
Kata Kunci
Teks Lengkap:
PDFReferensi
Arriyabandu, M.,M. 2009. Sex, Gender and Gender Relations in Disasters. chapter in Enarson (2009) Women, Gender and Disaster. SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd ; New Delhi
Dimitríjevics, A. (2007). Mainstreaming Gender into Disaster Recovery and Reconstruction. The World Bank Institute
Duncan, Alyssa., Parknson, Debra., Archer, Frank., Keech, Emma. 2018a. Diversity in Disaster conference : Executive Summary of Issues paper. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, Vol 3, pg 5-10
Enarson, Elaine. 2000. Gender Equality, Work and Disaster Reduction : Making The Connections. Researchgate
Eriksen, C. 2014. Gender and wildfire: Landscapes of uncertainty. New York: Routledge.
European Commission (1998). 100 Words for Equality: A Glossary of Terms on Equality between Women and Men.
Irawan, Valentinus "Pengurangan Resiko Bencana", makalah p.tda diskusi 01ientmi Pengurangan 1.nzko Bentana, Proyck Pu-UNDP, 6 Yogyakarta 12 Juli 2007, h. 5
Kahn, J. S. 2011. Feminist therapy for men: challenging assumptions and moving forward. Women and Therapy, 34, 59-76.
Livingston, M. 2011. A longitudinal analysis of alcohol outlet density and domestic violence. Addiction, 106, 919-925.
Lohan, L. 2010. Disaster exacerbates violence against women in Haiti. Dari http://womensissues.about.com/b/2010/01/21/disaster-exacerbates-violence-againstwomen-in-haiti.htm
Lynch, K. 2011. Spike in domestic violence after Christchurch earthquake. Dari http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/christchurch-earthquake/4745720/Spike-in-domesticviolence-after-Christchurch-earthquake
Moser, Caroline Gender Planning and Development. (1993). Theory, practice and Training, Routledge, UK/ USA.
Murtakhamah, Titin. 2013. Petingnya Pengarusutamaan Gender dalam program pengurangan Resiko Bencana. Jurnal Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sosial, 2:1, pg 38: 53
Neumayer, E., & Pluemper T. (2007). The gendered nature of natural disasters: The impact of catastrophic events on the gender gap in life expectancy 1981-2002
Oko, Juliette. 2008. Understanding and Using Theory in Social Work. Learning Matters Ltd. British
Partenza, N. 2012. Women’s health Goulburn North East. http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/black-saturday-caused-increase-in-domestic-violence-researchfinds-20120123-1qe13.html
Pathak, S., & Ahmad, M. M. (2018). Role of government in flood disaster recovery for SMEs in Pathumthani province, Thailand. Natural Hazards. doi:10.1007/s11069-018-3335-7
Pincha, Chaman. 2008. Penanggulangan Bencana yang Peka Gender. Earthworm Books for Oxfam America dan NANBAN Trust
Pittaway, Eileen., Bartolomei, Linda dan Rees, Susan. 2007. Gendered Dimensions of the 2004 Tsunami and a Potential Social Work Response in Post Disaster Situation. International Social Work, 50:3, pg 307-319
Saito, Fumie.2012. Women and the 2011 East Japan Disaster. Journal of Fender & Development, 20:2, pg 265-279
Shreve dan Kelman. 2014. Does mitigation save? Reviewing cost-benefit analyses of disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 10 (2014) 213–235.
Zastrow, Charles dan Kirst-Ashman, Karen. 2007. Human Behavior and The Social Environment. Thomson Brooks/Cole. United States of America
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/share.v9i2.25562
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.