KARAKTERISTIK DASAR LITERASI DIGITAL DAN RELASI SOSIAL GENERASI MILENIAL BANTEN
Abstract
ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi karakteristik dasar literasi digital dan relasi sosial generasi milenial di Banten. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode survei. Pertanyaan terkait dengan literasi digital terbagi atas tiga kelompok, yaitu mengenai penggunaan perangkat, strategi membaca, dan strategi verifikasi informasi. Sementara pertanyaan terkait dengan relasi sosial terdiri dari bagaimana informan melakukan interaksi sosial, bagaimana kepeduliannya terhadap pandangan masyarakat terhadap dirinya, dan bagaimana relasi informan dalam kelompok.
Hasil penelitian ini menemukan bahwa generasi milenial Banten memiliki karakteristik dasar literasi digital: (1) generasi milenial Banten mengandalkan buku sebagai sumber informasi; (2) bentuk visual informasi mulai dari yang paling disukai generasi milenial Banten ialah video; (3) gaya membaca generasi milenial Banten yang terbanyak ialah dengan menggunakan kata kunci atau fokus tertentu; (4) strategi verifikasi informasi generasi milenial Banten ialah dengan membandingkan sumber. Sementara pada karakteristik relasi sosial generasi milenial Banten ditemukan bahwa generasi milenial Banten lebih menyukai interaksi langsung dalam melakukan interaksi sosial, dan generasi milenial lebih menyukai aktivitas komunal dan aktif dalam kegiatan kelompok.
Dengan demikian karakteristik generasi milenial di tingkat lokal Banten tidak sepenuhnya sama dengan karakteristik literasi digital maupun relasi sosial yang menjadi arusutama pandangan masyarakat luas maupun yang dijadikan dasar pengambilan kebijakan. Dengan begitu perlu dilakukan evaluasi secara menyeluruh atas keputusan perubahan yang menyandarkan diri pada generalisasi karakteristik generasi.
Kata kunci: literasi digital, relasi sosial, pembangunan manusia, generasi milenial, sosiologi pembangunan.
ABSTRACT
This study aims to explore the basic characteristics Banten’s millennial generation of digital literacy and social relations. This research uses survey method. Questions related to digital literacy are divided into three groups, namely regarding the use of devices, reading strategies, and information verification strategies. While the questions related to social relations consist of how the informant conducts social interaction, how concerned about the public's view of him, and how the informant's relations within the group.
The results of this study found that Banten's millennial generation has the basic characteristics of digital literacy: (1) Banten's millennial generation relies on books as a source of information; (2) the visual form of information starting from the most preferred Banten millennial generation is video; (3) Banten's most millennial generation reading style is by using certain keywords or focus; (4) Banten millennial generation information verification strategy is to compare sources. While on the characteristics of Banten millennial generation social relations it is found that the Banten millennial generation prefers direct interaction in carrying out social interactions, and millennial generation prefers communal and active activities in group activities.
Thus the characteristics of millennial generation at the local level in Banten are not entirely the same as the characteristics of digital literacy and social relations which are the main stream of view of the wider community and are used as the basis for policy making. In this way, it is necessary to conduct a thorough evaluation of the change decisions that rely on generalizing generational characteristics.
Keywords: digital literacy, social relation, human development, millennial generation, sociology of development.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Ali, H., Purwandi, L., Nugroho, H., Ekoputri, A., & Halim, T. (2017). The Urban Middle-Class Millenials Indonesia: Financial and Online Behavior. Jakarta: PT. Alvara Strategi Indonesia. Retrieved June 21, 2020 (https://alvara-strategic.com/wp-content/uploads/whitepaper/The-Urban-Middle-Class-Millenials.pdf).
Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. 2016. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI) daring. Retrieved June 21, 2020 (https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/).
Barni, M. 2019. Tantangan Pendidik Di Era Millennial. JURNAL TRANSFORMATIF (ISLAMIC STUDIES), 3(1), 99-116. doi: 10.23971/tf.v3i1.1251
Bennett S., Maton K. & Kervin L. 2008. “The ‘Digital Natives’ Debate: A Critical Review of the Evidence”. British Journal of Educational Technology 39, 775–786. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x
Budiati, I. (dkk). 2018. Statistik Gender Tematik: Profil Generasi Milenial Indonesia. Jakarta: Kementerian Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak. Retrived June 21, 2020 (https://www.kemenpppa.go.id/lib/uploads/list/9acde-buku-profil-generasi-milenia.pdf).
Durkheim, Emile. 1913 (1984). The Division of Labour in Society. Trans. W. D. Halls, intro. Lewis A. Coser. Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Eshet-Alkalai, Y. 2004. Digital Literacy: A Conceptual Framework for Survival Skills in the Digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93-106. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved June 21, 2020 (https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/4793/).
Eshet-Alkalai, Y., & Chajut, E. 2009. Changes over time in digital literacy. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(6), 713-715. doi:10.1089/cpb.2008.0264
Fajriani, S. W., & Sugandi, Y. S. 201). Hijrah Islami Milenial Berdasarkan Paradigma Berorientasi Identitas. Sosioglobal: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Sosiologi, 3(2), 76-88. doi:10.24198/jsg.v3i2.21643
Fatmawati, N. 2019. Literasi Digital, Mendidik Anak di Era Digital bagi Orang Tua Milenial. Madani Jurnal Politik Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 11(2), 119-138. Retrieved June, 21 2020 (http://e-jurnal.unisda.ac.id/index.php/MADANI/article/view/1602)
Gilster, Paul. 1997. Digital Literacy. New York: Wiley.
Howe, N., & Strauss, W. 2000. Millennials rising: The next great generation. Vintage.
__________________. 2003. Millennials go to college: Strategies for a new generation on campus: Recruiting and admissions, campus life, and the classroom. Washington, DC: American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers.
Manuel, K. 2002. Teaching information literacy to generation. Journal of library administration, 36(1-2), 195-217. doi:10.1300/J111v36n01_12.
Marx, K. 1987 (1967). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. I, trans. Moore, S, Aveling, E, ed. Engels, F . New York, NY: International Publishers.
Meyers, E. M., Erickson, I., & Small, R. V. (2013). Digital literacy and informal learning environments: an introduction. Learning, media and technology, 38(4), 355-367.
Oblinger, D., Oblinger, J. L., & Lippincott, J. K. 2005. Educating the net generation. Boulder, Colo.: Educause. Retrieved May 01, 2020 (https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/pub7101.pdf)
Oh, Eunjung, and Thomas C. Reeves. 2013. “Generational Differences and the Integration of Technology in Learning, Instruction, and Performance.” Pp. 819–828 in Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. New York, NY: Springer New York. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_66.
Osterman, Mark D. 2012. “Digital Literacy: Definition, Theoretical Framework, and Competencies.” in Proceedings of the 11th Annual College of Education & GSN Research Conference (pp. 135-141). Miami: Florida International University. Retrieved May 01, 2020 (https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/sferc/2012/2012/6/).
Prenksy, M. 2001. Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon . MCB University Press, Vol. 9 No. 5, October 2001.
Setiawan, R. 2017. “Kebebasan Ekspresi Individual dalam Pembangunan Manusia Era Digital.” Pp. 169–78 in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan FKIP UNTIRTA 2017. Retrieved May 01, 2020 (http://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/psnp/article/view/169-178).
________ 2019. Membangun Kembali Pembelajaran Sosial Kearifan Lokal sebagai Upaya Preventif Bencana. In Talenta Conference Series: Local Wisdom, Social, and Arts (LWSA) (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 94-101). doi:10.32734/lwsa.v2i1.624
Simmel, G., 1978. The Philosophy of Money, trans. by T. Bottomore and D. Frisby. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Stefani, S. Nurbani, & Badarrudin. 2017. Literasi Digital dan: Studi Korelasi Penggunaan Media Sosial Pada Pelajar Remaja di Kota Medan. Sosioglobal: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Sosiologi, 2(1), 10-31. doi:10.24198/jsg.v2i1.15268
Stolley, K. S. 2005. The basics of sociology. New York: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Sutrisno, B. 2017. Resensi Buku Digital Sociology. Sosioglobal: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Sosiologi, 2(1), 84-86. doi:10.24198/jsg.v2i1.15273
Turkle, Sherry. 2011. Alone Together: Why we expect more from technology and less. New York: Basic Books.
Turner, J. H. (2002). Face to face: Toward a sociological theory of interpersonal behavior. Stanford University Press.
Weber, M., In Gerth, H., & Mills, C. W. 1946. From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
