EXPLORING THE USE OF MODAL AUXILIARY VERBS IN CORPUS OF CONTEMPORARY OF AMERICAN ENGLISH (COCA)

Meita Lukitawati Sujatna, Eva Tuckyta Sari Sujatna, Kasno Pamungkas

Abstract


ABSTRACT. This paper deals with the frequent use of modal auxiliary verbs in Corpus of Contemporary of American English (COCA). The modal auxiliary verbs mentioned as the data are can, could, will, would, may, might, shall, should, and must. Each data collected are taken from COCA in https://corpus.byu.edu/coca/. The research method is descriptive analysis; the present writers describe every data related to their function in each clause. The findings are related to the highest frequency and the number of elements follow the modal auxiliary verbs. From the 6,008,840 data, it is found the verb would (1,301,269 data) is the most frequently used, it is followed by the verb can (1,228,608 data), the verb will (1,118,515 data), the verb could (885,835 data), the verb may (494,144 data), the verb should (435,903 data), the verb might (300,258 data), the verb must (223,936 data), and the verb shall (20,372 data). This study has also revealed the number of elements following each of modal auxiliary verbs found in the COCA. It is reported that the verb would has seven different types,will has five different types, could and should has four different types, can, may, must, and shall have three different types, and might has two different types as the least number of elements following the verb. From the data analyzed, it is also reported that the modal auxiliary verb would is not only has the highest number in data (as the highest frequency) but also has various number of elements follow the verb.

 


Keywords


modal auxiliary verb; corpus; Corpus of Contemporary American English; central modals

Full Text:

PDF

References


iber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

Hsieh, C.L. (2005). Modal Verbs and Modal Adverbs in Chinese: An Investigation into Semantic Source. University System of Taiwan Working Papers in Linguistics 1, pp. 31-58.

Jones, C. & Walter, D. (2015). Corpus Linguistics for Grammar. New York: Routledge .

Kennedy, G. (2002). Variation in distribution of modal verbs in the British National Corpus. In R. Reppen, S. M. Fitzmaurice, & D. Biber, Using Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Company.

Mukundan, J., & Khojasteh, L. (2011). Modal Auxiliary Verbs in Prescribed Malaysian English Textbooks. English Language Teaching, 4, (1), pp.79-89.

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1992). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman .

Sujatna, E. T. S. (2012). Object Complements in English. Saarbrucken: Lambert Academic Publishing.

Sujatna, E. T. S. (2013). Understanding English Syntax. Bandung: Unpad Press

Verstraete, J.-C. (2001). Subjective and objective modality: Interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system. Journal of Pragmatic, 33, (10), pp. 1505-1528.

Watkins, M. (1990). Practice Your Modal Verbs. Singapore: Longman.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v21i2.19970

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Sosiohumaniora

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Sosiohumaniora Indexed By:

 

width= width= width= width=120 width= width=  width=  width= width= width= width= width=  width= width=120 

Lisensi Creative Commons Creation is distributed below Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

  

Visitor Statistics


Published By:

Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran

Dean's Building 2nd Floor, Jalan Ir. Soekarno Km. 21 Jatinangor, Sumedang 45363

Email: jurnal.sosiohumaniorafisip@gmail.com