ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION PATTERNS BASED ON LOCAL WISDOM IN MANAGEMENT OF LUBUK LARANGAN IN SUBAYANG RIVER

Yasir Yasir; Muhammad Firdaus; Rusmadi Awza

doi:10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v25i1.41044

ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION PATTERNS BASED ON LOCAL WISDOM IN MANAGEMENT OF LUBUK LARANGAN IN SUBAYANG RIVER

Yasir Yasir, Muhammad Firdaus, Rusmadi Awza

Abstract

Lubuk larangan is tradition and also a means of communication based on local wisdom in managing the river and forest environment in Kampar Kiri Hulu District, Kampar Regency. This study aims to explain environmental communication pattern based on local wisdom in the management of Lubuk larangan in the Subayang River, Kampar Regency. This study uses a qualitative descriptive research method using an interactive model. There were six informants who were selected purposively. The results show that environmental communication is based on the local wisdom of the community that has been passed down from generation to generation. Traditional leaders (ninik mamak) play an important role in conveying messages of environmental concern in preserving the preservation of the forbidden pits (lubuk larangan), rivers and forest. This hereditary tradition forms local wisdom as a form of joint action through deliberation and mutual cooperation activities. The community manages the lubuk prohibition through communication based on customary law, rituals, myths, phrases, proverbs, and the annual tradition of catching fish (mencokou). This channel of communication through customary laws, myths and traditions is very effective in conserving the Subayang river and forest areas. The environmental communication based on local wisdom in the Subayang River contributes to supporting the preservation of natural resources of forests, rivers, fish and existing ecosystems. Stakeholders such as local governments, universities, mass media, NGOs, companies and the community must synergize with each other in developing local wisdom as a tourist area so that it can be of added value.

Keywords

environmental communication; local wisdom; tradition; lubuk larangan

Full Text:

PDF

References

Bakti, I., Hafiar, H., & Budiana, H. R. (2017). Environmental Communication Based on Local Wisdom In Anticipation of Citarum Flood. MIMBAR, Jurnal Sosial Dan Pembangunan, 33(1), 208. https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v33i1.2281

Chaichana, D., Srijuntrapun, P., & Rawang, W. (2019). An integrative framework of environmental education for environmental crisis transformation. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 27(4), 2475–2494.

Chandrabuwono, A. B., & Atika, A. (2019). Komunikasi Lingkungan Masyarakat Sungai Tabuk Dalam Menjaga Kebersihan Sungai. Metacommunication: Journal of Communication Studies, 4(2), 195. https://doi.org/10.20527/mc.v4i2.6939

Cox, R. (2010). Environmental Communication and the Public Sphare. Sage Publication.

Darmastuti, R., Bajari, A., Martodirdjo, H. S., & Maryani, E. (2017). Gethok Tular, Pola Komunikasi Gerakan Sosial Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Masyarakat Samin di Sukolilo. Jurnal ASPIKOM, 3(1), 104. https://doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v3i1.103

DeLorme, D. E., Stephens, S. H., Hagen, S. C., & Bilskie, M. V. (2018). Communicating with coastal decision-makers and environmental educators via sea level rise decision-support tools. Journal of Science Communication, 17(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.17030203

Flor, A. G., & Cangara, H. (2018). Komunikasi lingkungan: Penanganan Kasus-kasus Lingkungan Melalui Strategi Komunikasi (Pertama). Prenadamedia Group.

Fontanella, A., Gani, L., Djakman, C. D., & Wahyuni, T. (2019). Effect of environmental budget on environmental and human development qualities: Empirical evidence from local governments of Indonesia. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 27(4), 2813–2827.

Grodzińska-Jurczak, M. (2018). Does participation make sense? : effective methods of including people in biodiversity conservation. Papers on Global Change IGBP, 25, 23–30. https://doi.org/10.24425/igbp.2018.124889

Gunathilaka, M. D. K. L. (2020). Environmental Communication for Mangrove Restoration and Conservation in a Fishing Village , Sri Lanka. International Journal of Reseach and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), IV(V), 22–27.

Hadiprashada, D., & Budiman, D. A. (2019). Komunikasi Lingkungan dalam Budaya Masyarakat (Analisis Model Pesan Two Way Asymmetrical pada Lembaga Adat). Jurnal Komunikasi, 11(2), 213. https://doi.org/10.24912/jk.v11i2.5920

Khazaie, G. R., Riazi, S. A., & Azadarmaki, T. (2020). Religious ecologism, a comparative review of Abrahamian, East Asian and Ancient Iranian Religious traditions. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 28(1), 425–440.

Kitic, B., Kostic Stankovic, M., Cvijovic, J., & Lecic Cvetkovic, D. (2015). Environmental Aspect of Business Communications. Management - Journal for Theory and Practice of Management, 20(1), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.7595/management.fon.2015.0004

Lestari, P., Paripurno, E. T., Kusumayudha, S. B., & Ramadhaniyanto, B. (2016). Komunikasi Lingkungan untuk Mitigasi Erupsi Gunung Sinabung. Jurmal ASPIKOM, 3(1), 56–64.

Littlejohn, S., & Foss, K. A. (2016). “Encyclopedia of Communication Theory”. Sage Publication. Terjemahan Tri Wibowo BS. Ensiklopedia Teori Komunikasi. Kencana.

Maxwell, J. (2014). Designing a Qualitative Study. In The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods (Issue January 2008, pp. 214–253). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483348858.n7

Moleong, L. J. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kulaitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Ngenye, L., & Kreps, G. L. (2020). A review of qualitative methods in health communication research. Qualitative Report, 25(3), 631–645. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4488

Nugraha, A. R., Perbawasari, S., & Zubair, F. (2017). Model Komunikasi Pariwisata Yang Berbasiskan Kearifan Lokal. Jurnal The Messenger, 9(2), 231. https://doi.org/10.26623/themessenger.v9i2.468

Primayanti, N. W., & Puspita, V. (2022). Local wisdom narrative in environmental campaign. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2022.2090062

Rashid, Y., Rashid, A., Warraich, M. A., Sabir, S. S., & Waseem, A. (2019). Case Study Method: A Step-by-Step Guide for Business Researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919862424

Sumartias, S., Subekti, P., Perbawasari, S., & Bakti, I. (2022). Between Myths And Ethos: Framing Messages For Environmental Communication Of Kampung Naga Tasikmalaya West Java. Sosiohumaniora: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 24(2), 175–182. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v24i2.38825

Tantoro, S., & Yesi. (2017). Tradisi Lubuk Larangan di Desa Tanjung Belit Kecamatan Kampar Kiri Hulu Kabupaten Kampar. Prosiding Penelitian Dan Pengabdian FISIP Universitas Riau, 357–373.

Tantoro, S., Yesi, Y., Syafrizal, S., Kadarisman, Y., & Hidir, A. (2019). Model pemberdayaan masyarakat melalui pengembangan kelembagaan kelompok sadar wisata di Desa Tanjung Belit. Unri Conference Series: Community Engagement, 1, 56–60. https://doi.org/10.31258/unricsce.1.56-60

Veraliza, Saam, Z., & Thamrin. (2014). Manajemen Kearifan Lokal Lubuk Larangan Desa Pangkalan Indarung Kabupaten Kuantan Singingi Provinsi Riau. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan, 8(2), 180–196.

Villar, M. E. (2021). Community Engagement and Co-creation of Strategic Health and Environemtnal Communication: Collaborative Storytelling and Game-building. JCOM, 20(01), 1–9.

Vlibeigi, M., Sarhangi, E., & Karevani, N. (2020). Local Environmental Conservation Activities as a Key Factor for Social Interaction (Case Study: Bagh-Shater Local Community). Journal of Population and Social Studies, 29, 32–46. https://doi.org/10.25133/JPSSv292021.003

Wahyudin, U. (2017). Strategi Komunikasi Lingkungan Dalam Membangun. Jurnal Common, 1(2), 130–134.

Wulandari, S., Suwondo, S., & ... (2018). Local Wisdom of Lubuk Larangan in Subayang River as a Source of Learning Environmental Education. … on Educational …, 2015, 978–979.

Yanti, R., Syahza, A., Hidir, A., & Suwondo, S. (2018). The communication model of forest management based on environmental awareness. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 29(6), 1093–1109. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-02-2018-0028

Yasir, Y., Firzal, Y., Yesicha, C., & Sulistyani, A. (2022). Environmental Communication Based on Local Wisdom in Forest Conservation : A Study on Sentajo Forbidden Forest , Indonesia. Journal of Landscape Ecology(Czech Republic), 15(2), 127–145. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2478/jlecol-2022-0014

Yasir, Y., Nurjanah, N., & Yohana, N. (2020). Environmental Communication Model in Bengkalis’ s Mangrove Ecotourism Development. Jurnal ASPIKOM, 5(2), 322–337. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v5i2.692

Yenrizal, Bajari, A., Rahmat, A., & Iskandar, J. (2015). The meaning and value attachment to natural symbols by farmers in a rural setting: An ethno-ecology communication study of rural farmers in Swarna Dwipe village of Muara Enim regency in South Sumatera. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 10(16), 37630–37636.

Yunus, M. (2020). Pengelolaan Lubuk Larangan Di Sungai Kampar. ETNOREFLIKA: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya, 9(2), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.33772/etnoreflika.v9i2.829

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v25i1.41044