STRATEGY FOR ACHIEVING INTEGRITY ZONE AT MAKASSAR VOCATIONAL TRAINING AND PRODUCTIVITY CENTER

Burhanuddin Burhanuddin, Arfiani Arfiani, Mustaking Mustaking, Tunggul Prasodjo

Abstract


This research is a field research with a qualitative approach that aims to determine the implementation of the Makassar BBPVP integrity zone, to determine the supporting and inhibiting factors of the implementation of the Makassar BBPVP integrity zone and to find out the strategy for achieving the Makassar BBPVP integrity zone. Data collection was carried out using interview techniques that refer to six indicators of the implementation of the Integrity Zone, namely change management, management arrangement, management system arrangement, strengthening work accountability, strengthening staffing, and improving the quality of public services. The data analysis technique is to adapt the design model for the construction of integrity zones. The results of this study show that: 1) the implementation of integrity zones seen from six levers criteria, namely change management, implementation of governance, structuring the HR management system, strengthening performance accountability, strengthening supervision and improving the quality of public services has been carried out properly and in accordance with applicable procedures or mechanisms. 2. The strategy to achieve the integrity zone towards WBK/WBBM at BBPVP Makassar has been well implemented, as seen from the six criteria for leveraging the integrity zone achievement strategy, namely Management optimization, Optimization of governance arrangement, HR Management System Arrangement, Optimization of accountability strengthening, Optimization of supervision strengthening, and Optimization of improving the quality of public services

Keywords


Bureaucratic Reform; Corruption-Free; Good Governance; Integrity Zone

Full Text:

PDF

References


REFERENCES

Ahmadi, D., Rachmiatie, A., & Nursyawal. (2019). Public participation model for public information disclosure. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 35(4). https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2019-3504-19

Cornell, A., Knutsen, C. H., & Teorell, J. (2020). Bureaucracy and Growth. Comparative Political Studies, 53(14). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414020912262

Faedlulloh, D., Yulianto, Y., & Karmilasari, V. (2021). A Structural and Mindset Bureaucratic Reform Agenda for Jokowi’s Second Term. BISNIS & BIROKRASI: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Dan Organisasi, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.20476/jbb.v27i2.11466

Felten, S., & von Oertzen, C. (2020). Bureaucracy as Knowledge. Journal for the History of Knowledge, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/jhk.18

Ferreira, C. M., & Serpa, S. (2019). Rationalization and bureaucracy: Ideal-type bureaucracy by Max Weber. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7220

Jamaluddin, J., Saleh, S., Salam, R., & Arhas, S. H. (2022). Social Network Analysis Human Resource Development Using Twitter Data. SHS Web of Conferences, 149, 02030.

Jannah, L. M., Sipahutar, M. Y., & Hariyati, D. (2020). Public Information Disclosure: Mapping the Understanding of Multiple Actors in Corruption- Prone Indonesian Provinces. Policy & Governance Review, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v4i3.321

Liese, A., Herold, J., Feil, H., & Busch, P. O. (2021). The heart of bureaucratic power: Explaining international bureaucracies’ expert authority. Review of International Studies, 47(3). https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021052100005X

Niswaty, R., Manno, J., & Akib, H. (2015). An analysis of the public service performance based on human development index in makassar city, Indonesia. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research (IJABER), 13(6), 4421–4429.

Peraturan Menteri PANRB Nomor 15 Tahun 2015 Tentang Standar Pelayanan, (2015).

Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Nomor 52 tahun 2014 tentang Pembangunan Zona Integritas, (2014).

Permenpan RB No. 90 Tahun 2021 tentang Pembangunan dan Evaluasi Zona Integritas Menuju Wilayah Bebas dari Korupsi dan Wilayah Birokrasi Bersih dan Melayani di Instansi Pemerintah , (2021).

Sedarmayanti. (2014). Manajemen Strategi. Refika Aditama.

Shi, F., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Screening with Public Information Disclosure. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3753535

Sultan, S., Nawawi, J., Kahar, F., & Akib, H. (2014). Bureaucracy Responsiveness Factor Determinants Of Public Service Door On Licensing Office Parepare. International Journal of Academic Research, 6(3).

Undang-Undang No. 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional , (2003).

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 1999 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1974 Tentang Pokok-Pokok Kepegawaian. (1999). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 1999 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1974 Tentang Pokok-Pokok Kepegawaian. Menteri Negara Sekretaris Negara Republik Indonesia.

Weber, M. (2015). Bureaucracy. In Working in America: Continuity, Conflict, and Change in a New Economic Era. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315631011-9




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v25i2.46217

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Sosiohumaniora

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Sosiohumaniora Indexed By:

 

width= width= width= width=120 width= width=  width=  width= width= width= width= width=  width= width=120 

Lisensi Creative Commons Creation is distributed below Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

  

Visitor Statistics


Published By:

Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran

Dean's Building 2nd Floor, Jalan Ir. Soekarno Km. 21 Jatinangor, Sumedang 45363

Email: jurnal.sosiohumaniorafisip@gmail.com