THE SOUTH CHINA SEA GEOPOLITICAL DYNAMICS AND INDONESIA'S MARITIME SECURITY: A POLITICAL DEFENSE ANALYSIS

Abdul Rivai Ras

doi:10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v26i3.64461

THE SOUTH CHINA SEA GEOPOLITICAL DYNAMICS AND INDONESIA'S MARITIME SECURITY: A POLITICAL DEFENSE ANALYSIS

Abdul Rivai Ras

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the geopolitical dynamics in the South China Sea (SCS) region in relation to Indonesia's maritime security, viewed from the perspective of defense politics. The geopolitical dynamics in the SCS region are driven by China's claims through its Nine-Dash Line (NDL). China, as described by Cohen's Four Pillars (2015) as a country with extraordinary military power, has factually been willing to use it to legitimize and defend its claims. The surplus of economic power, besides being spent on modernizing its defense forces, is then utilized in the form of investment through the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) policy. These two pillars have become China's strength to dominate the SCS region. This study concludes that Indonesia needs to develop a defense political strategy as a soft power to face the major challenges of geopolitical dynamics in the SCS region. This defense politics can optimize ASEAN as first-track diplomacy and other activities as second-track diplomacy.

Keywords

geopolitics; maritime security; security policy

Full Text:

PDF

References

Anderson, D. H. (1997). British accession to the UN convention on the law of the sea. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 46(4), 761–786. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589300061200

Anh, C. N. (2023). The South China Sea for China, the United States, and what choice for Vietnam. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2204570

Bealey, F. (1999). The Blackwell dictionary of political science : a user’s guide to its terms. Blackwell Publishing.

Cai, P. (2017). Understanding China’s Belt and Road Initiative. In Lowy Institute for International Policy (Issue March). https://www.lowyinstitute.org/sites/default/files/documents/Understanding China’s Belt and Road Initiative_WEB_1.pdf

Cohen, S. B. (2008). Geopolitics: The Geography of International Relations. In Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Du, C., Liu, Z., Kao, S. J., & Dai, M. (2017). Diapycnal Fluxes of Nutrients in an Oligotrophic Oceanic Regime: The South China Sea. Geophysical Research Letters, 44(22), 11,510-11,518. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074921

Gao, Z., & Tjia, B. B. (2013). The Nine-Dash Line in the South China Sea : History, status, and implications. American Society of International Law, 107(1), 98–124.

Grossman, D. (2019). Military build-up in the South China Sea. In The South China Sea. Routledge.

Hongbin, D., & Ullah, I. (2022). the South China Sea’S Nine Dash Line: Key Disputes and China’S Historical Rights Claims. Journal of Pakistan-China Studies (JPCS), 3(1), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.55733/jpcs.v3i1.53

Hu, L. (2023). Examining ASEAN’s effectiveness in managing South China Sea disputes. Pacific Review, 36(1), 119–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2021.1934519

Hue, Q. T., Chien, L. T., Thanh, D. Q., Huong, B. V., & Man, N. M. (2023). Adjustment of India’S Foreign Policy for Southeast Asia in the Time of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Its Impacts on India - Vietnam Relationships. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(4), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i4.568

Junef, M. (2018). Sengketa Wilayah Maritim di Laut Tiongkok Selatan. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 18(2), 219. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2018.v18.219-240

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications.

Pramono, W. T., Darmawan, A., Deffinika, I., & Soelistijo, D. (2020). Geopolitical Implication on Contested Waters; Comparison between Indonesia and the Philippines Strategy to Overlapping South China Sea Waters. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 412. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/412/1/012034

Putra, B. A. (2024). Brunei’s silent claims in the South China Sea: a case for the theory of trade expectations. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2317533

Rowan, J. P. (2005). The U.S.-Japan Security Alliance, ASEAN, and the South China Sea Dispute. Asian Survey, 45(3), 414–436.

Saeed, M. (2017). From the Asia-pacific to the indo-pacific: Expanding sino-U.S. strategic competition. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies, 3(4), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2377740017500324

Scott, S. V. (2016). China’s nine-dash line, international law, and the Monroe Doctrine analogy. China Information, 30(3), 296–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203X16665054

Storey, I. (2020). The South China Sea Dispute. In ISEAS: Yusof Ishak Institute (Issue 97). https://doi.org/10.7312/columbia/9780231159005.003.0011

Sugiharto, E., Pardede, L., Prahara, G., Priatna, A., & Mugia, R. (2024). Government Collaboration in Enhancing National Defense. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan : Kajian Ilmu Pemerintahan Dan Politik Daerah, 9(2), 93–103.

Sundram, P. (2024). ASEAN cooperation to combat transnational crime: progress, perils, and prospects. Frontiers in Political Science, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1304828

Syarifudin. (2023). Sending 60 Warships, Russia Holds Exercises in the Sea of Japan and the Sea of Okhotsk [Kirim 60 Kapal Perang, Rusia Gelar Latihan di Laut Jepang dan Laut Okhotsk]. Sindonews.

Trần, B. H., Nguyễn Anh, C., & Đinh Trần, Y. N. (2024). Challenges for Vietnam in protecting South China Sea sovereignty and interests. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2401629

Tudy, R. (2023). Advancing National Interests in the Global Arena: A Systematic Review on President Duterte’s Foreign Policies. Journal of Public Administration, Public Affairs, and Management , 21(2), 247–272. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/pajournal/article/view/267921

Yalcin, I., Kocaman, S., Saunier, S., & Albinet, C. (2021). Radiometric quality assessment for maxar hd imagery. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives, 43, 797–804. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-797-2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v26i3.64461