MONEY POLITICS AS CULTURE:  KEPYUR AND RATIONAL CHOICE AMONG RURAL VOTERS IN KENDAL REGENCY ELECTIONS

Kuncoro Bayu Prasetyo; Zulfa Yuladia Nur Khasanah; Najwa Mutiara Aila

doi:10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v28i1.68061

MONEY POLITICS AS CULTURE: KEPYUR AND RATIONAL CHOICE AMONG RURAL VOTERS IN KENDAL REGENCY ELECTIONS

Kuncoro Bayu Prasetyo, Zulfa Yuladia Nur Khasanah, Najwa Mutiara Aila

Abstract

Kepyur is a local term used by the people of Kendal Regency to refer to the practice of money politics in elections. Kepyur practices have become a cultural norm in Kendal, occurring in village head elections, parliamentary elections, and regional head elections. This study aims to explain the factors behind the prevalence of kepyur practices and analyze their relationship with voters’ rational choices. The research employed a qualitative descriptive method using a case study approach, focusing on the 2020 regional election in Kalibareng Village. Data were collected through observation, interviews, and documentation. Data analysis involved data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing based on rational choice theory. The results indicate that money politics in the form of kepyur is not considered reprehensible by the community. For campaign teams, distributing kepyur to voters is viewed as a rational strategy to secure electoral victory for their candidates. Similarly, for community members, kepyur is perceived as a rational consequence, as voting for a candidate entails losing time that could otherwise be spent working. Unlike conventional money politics, which is generally associated with coercive vote buying, political bribery, or explicit electoral exchange, kepyur is socially legitimized and embedded in everyday economic practices. It is not understood as an illegal transaction but rather as informal compensation for lost livelihoods on election day. Kepyur has shifted political rational choice toward economic rationality, as voting rights can be exchanged for financial benefits that substitute for lost income on election day.

Keywords

kepyur; money politics; political culture; rational choice; regional head election.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adhinata, B. (2019). Vote Buying dan Perilaku Pemilih Pemula: Kasus Pemilihan Gubernur Bali 2018 di Tabanan. POLITIKA, 10(2), 2.

Akbar, I. (2016). Pilkad Serentak dan Geliat Dinamika Politik dan Pemeringtahan Lokal Indonesia. CosmoGov: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, Vol 2, No 1 (2016), 95–110. http://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/cosmogov/article/view/11852/5523

Ananingsih, S. W. (2016). Tantangan Dalam Penanganan Dugaan Praktik Politik Uang Pada Pilkada Serentak 2017. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 45(1), 49–57.

Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for sale: Elections, clientelism, and the state in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.

Aspinall, E., & Sukmajati, M. (2015). Politik Uang di Indonesia: Patronase dan Klientelisme pada Pemilu Legislatif 2014 [Money politics in Indonesia: Patronage and clientelism in the 2014 legislative election]. Research Centre for Politics and Government.

Canare, T. A., Mendoza, R. U., & Lopez, M. A. (2018). An empirical analysis of vote buying among the poor: Evidence from elections in the Philippines. South East Asia Research, 26(1), 58–84.

Çarkoğlu, A., & Aytaç, S. E. (2015). Who gets targeted for vote-buying? Evidence from an augmented list experiment in Turkey. European Political Science Review, 7(4), 547–566.

Coleman, J. S. (2017). Dasar-Dasar Teori Sosial (Edisi Revisi). Nusamedia.

Creswell, J. W. (2015). Penelitian Kualitatif & Desain Riset: Memilih di Antara Lima Pendekatan. Pustaka Pelajar.

Denemark, D. (2023). Clientelism and distributive politics in Australia: comparing partisan pork barrel with contingency‑based vote‑buying. In Political Parties and Electoral Clientelism (pp. 10–31). Springer.

Fitriyah. (2013). Fenomena politik uang dalam pilkada. Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 3(1), 5–14.

Fitriyah, F. (2015). Cara Kerja Politik Uang (Studi Kasus Pilkada dan Pilkades di Kabupaten Pati). Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 6(2), 101–111.

Frye, T., Reuter, O. J., & Szakonyi, D. (2019). Hitting them with carrots: Voter intimidation and vote buying in Russia. British Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 857–881.

Hafizy, W., Dewi, I. P., Nur, F. A., Budiawati, W., Wiraguna, A., & Yuliantoro, W. (2021). Kilas Balik Pemilihan Serentak Tahun 2020: Evaluasi Pembentukan Badan Ad-hoc Penyelenggara Pemilihan pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 (Sekarlinasti & M. Veronita (eds.)). Komisi Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia. https://jdih.kpu.go.id/data/data_artikel/Kilas Balik Pemilihan Serentak 2020 - Evaluasi Pembentukan Badan Ad-Hoc Penyelenggaraan Pemilihan Pada Masa Pandemi COVID-19.pdf

Hawing, H., Fadillah, B. N., & Parawu, H. E. (2020). Pengaruh Politik Uang Terhadap Partisipasi Pemilih Pemilukada Pemilihan Bupati dan Wakil Bupati Wajo Tahun 2018. Journal of Social Politics and Governance (JSPG), 2(2), 192–204.

Hidayaturrahman, M., Ngarawula, B., & Sadhana, K. (2022). Political investors: Political elite oligarchy and mastery of regional resources in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 7(2), 269–281.

Januar, E. (2018). Dinamika Money Politics pada Pemilukada Aceh 2017. Al-Ijtimai: International Journal of Government and Social Science, 4(1), 49–62.

Kalibareng, P. (2021). Monografi Desa Kalibareng.

KPU Kab Kendal. (2021). Hasil Pemilu dan Pilkada. https://kab-kendal.kpu.go.id/blog/read/hasil-pemilu-dan-pilkada

Kurniawan, R. C. K., & Hermawan, D. (2019). Strategi sosial pencegahan politik uang di Indonesia. Jurnal Integritas, 5(1), 69–90. https://jurnal.kpk.go.id/index.php/integritas/article/view/338

Lukmajati, D. (2016). Praktek Politik Uang Dalam Pemilu Legislatif 2014 (Studi Kasus di Kabupaten Blora). Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 7(1), 138–159.

Maemunah, M., & Masita, M. (2016). Praktek Politik Uang Pada Pemilukada Serentak 2015 (Studi Kasus di Desa Simpasai Kecamatan Lambu Kabupaten Bima). CIVICUS: Pendidikan-Penelitian-Pengabdian Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 4(1), 21–26.

Muhtadi, B. (2013). POLITIK UANG DAN DINAMIKA ELEKTORAL DI INDONESIA: SEBUAH KAJIAN AWAL INTERAKSI ANTARA “ PARTY-ID” DAN PATRON-KLIEN. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 10(1 SE-Articles), 17. https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v10i1.217

Nabila, N., Prananingtyas, P., & Azhar, M. (2020). Pengaruh money politic dalam pemilihan anggota legislatif terhadap keberlangsungan demokrasi di indonesia. Notarius, 13(1), 138–153.

Nuryanti, S. (2015). Intervensi Penyelenggaraan Pemilukada: Regulasi, Sumberdaya dan Eksekusi. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 19(2), 125–140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.10849

Nwankwo, C. F. (2018). Vote buying in the 2018 governorship election in Ekiti State, Nigeria. Open Political Science, 1(1), 93–97.

Ritzer, G. (2018). Teori Sosiologi Modern (7th ed.). Kencana.

Silverman, D. (2004). Qualitative Research Theory, Method and Practice. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Sage Publications (2nd editio). Sage Publications Ltd.

Sorik, S. (2019). Penataan Demokrasi Dan Pemilu Di Indonesia Pasca Reformasi. Journal of Political Research, 16(1), 101–107.

Sugiyono, S. (2010). Metode penelitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta Bandung, 14.

Suprianto, L. O. (2017). PERSEPSI MASYARAKAT TERHADAP POLITIK UANG PADA PILKADA SERENTAK. Jurnal Neo Societal, 2(4).

Yolanda, R., & Hasan, E. (2017). Upaya dan Kendala Panwaslih Kabupaten Bireuen Dalam Mengungkapkan Kasus Money Politik Pilkada 2017 di Kabupaten Bireuen. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, 2(4).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v28i1.68061