THE POLITICAL INTERVENTION ON GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS’ PROMOTION IN INDONESIA

Ella Lesmanawaty Wargadinata

Abstract


The promotion government officials comes into new era, the new policy reversed from a very closed selection process and heavily seniority-based to open, clear criteria, transparent procedures on the competency-based series test. In fact, policy implementation is not fully in favour of an administration driven. The study has two main research problems “How open promotion for local government officers conducted?” and “How does political intervention work in the open promotion mechanism?”. This paper provides comprehensive mechanism-the hybrid administration-politics model on open promotion of local bureaucrats in Indonesia. The study used a qualitative approach and assited by Nvivo 12 to reveal the most frequent concept on open promotion practices based on interviews. The data obtained through interviews with informants which selected purposively, selection committee members, candidates, and local government officers. This paper affirms interesting features. The competency series tested by independent assessors reflects an administration mechanism through merit concept. However, the absolute political final decision-making process at the governor or Mayor’s hands reflects the individual-political interest. This system shows that the administration’s process at the local level links tightly to political deliberation. The key message is that open promotion in government agencies is neither a pure merit issue nor a spoils system for competence-heavy based, on the one hand, yet is always amenable to some political intervention. The merit principles are universal; however, the practices are contextual-specific. This study has an important value in describing how The politics play significant role on local administration system.


Keywords


Political Intervention; Patrimonial; Public-personnel management; Hybrid Administration-Politics model

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adi, Y. (2018). Bureaucratic Reform to the improvement of public services Challenges for Indonesia. Publikauma : Jurnal Administrasi Publik Universitas Medan Area. 6,(1), 15-29 https://doi.org/10.31289/publika.v6i1.1494

Akny, A. B. (2014). Mewujudkan Good Governance Melalui Reformasi Birokrasi di Bidang SDM Aparatur untuk Peningkatan Kesejahteraan Pegawai. Jurnal Jejaring Administrasi Publik. 6,(1), 416-427.

Amarullah, R., & Maulana, L. (2017). Patronage Culture in the Middle of Bureaucratic Reform Efforts in Indonesia. Public Policy and Administration Research, 7(1), 20–20.

Budiman, A., Roan, A., & Callan, V. J. (2013). Rationalizing Ideologies, Social Identities and Corruption Among Civil Servants in Indonesia During the Suharto Era. Journal of Business Ethics. 116, 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1451-y

Budiman, N., S, S. I., & Sendow. Grels M. (2016). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Motivasi, Dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan (Studi Pada Pt. Hasjrat Abadi Tendean Manado). Jurnal EMBA, 4(4), 321–332.

Chairiyah, A., S, A., Nugroho, A., & Suhariyanto, A. (2020). Implementasi Sistem Merit Pada Aparatur Sipil Negara Di Indonesia. Borneo Administrator, 16(3), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v16i3.704

Colonnelli, E., Prem, M., & Teso, E. (2020). Patronage and selection in public sector organizations. American Economic Review. 110,(10), 3071-99 https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20181491

Creswell, J. W. . (2012). Qualitative inquiry & Research Design (4th ed.). SAGE.

Fathya, V. N. (2018). Upaya Reformasi Birokrasi melalui Area Perubahan Mental Aparatur untuk Memberantas Praktik Pungutan Liar yang dilakukan oleh PNS. CosmoGov. 4,(1), 38-51. https://doi.org/10.24198/cosmogov.v4i1.14462

Gajduschek, G. (2003). BUREAUCRACY: IS IT EFFICIENT? IS IT NOT? IS THAT THE QUESTION? Uncertainty Reduction: An Ignored Element of Bureaucratic Rationality. Administration & Society, 34(6), 700–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399702239171

Gaus, N., Sultan, S., & Basri, M. B. (2016). State Bureaucracy in Indonesia and its Reforms: An Overview. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(8), 658–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1186179

Ginting, Rosalina & Haryati, T. (2011). Reformasi Birokrasi Publik. Jurnal Ilmiah Civis. 1,(2), 27-41.

Haning, M. T. (2018). Reformasi Birokrasi di Indonesia: Tinjauan Dari Perspektif Administrasi Publik. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Dan Pelayanan Publik. 4,(1), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.31947/jakpp.v4i1.5902

Hapsari, M. I., Nurhaeni, I. D. A., & Sudarmo, S. (2018). Quo Vadis Bureaucracy Reform Of Indonesia: Overview Of Bureaucratic Reform Phase l Vs Phase II. https://doi.org/10.2991/aapa-18.2018.35

Harsasto Priyatno, U. S. (2018). Democracy, Decentralization and Efficientcy: A Study of Bureaucratic Reforms in Indonesia. ICENIS 2018, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/2018730 ICENIS 2018 9011 011

Hayat, & Ngusmanto. (2020). Promotion pattern of bureaucratic official in the direct selection era of regional head. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy. 11,(2), 210-218. https://doi.org/10.5530/srp.2020.2.33

Hilal, A. H., & Alabri, S. S. (2013). Using NVivo for data analysis in qualitative research. International Interdisciplinary Journal of Education –, 2(2), 181–186. http://www.iijoe.org/v2/IIJOE_06_02_02_2013.pdf

Jankelová, N., Joniaková, Z., & Puhovichová, D. (2022). Factors influencing employee engagement in public administration. Public Administration Issues, 6(2), 53–77. https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431- 2022-0-6-53-77

Karachiwalla, N., & Park, A. (2017). Promotion incentives in the public sector: Evidence from Chinese schools. Journal of Public Economics. 146. 109-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.12.004

Kasim, A. (2013). Bureaucratic reform and dynamic governance for combating corruption: The challenge for indonesia. Bisnis & Birokrasi, 20(1), 18-22. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/bureaucratic-reform-dynamic-governance-combating/docview/1459406437/se-2

Khan, I.U. & Hussain, S. (2020). Bureaucracy and Public Management Reforms: Evidence from Pakistan . Hrvatska i komparativna javna uprava, 20 (1), 57-77. https://doi.org/10.31297/hkju.20.1.3

Kumar, R. (2011). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners (3rd ed.). SAGE Publication.

M. Harun Alrasyid. (2007). REFORMASI BIROKRASI. Jurnal Madani. Edisi 1.

Mariana, D. (2006). Reformasi Birokrasi Pemerintah Pasca Oorde Baru. Sosiohumaniora. 8,(3), 240 - 254

Martini, R. (2010). Politisasi Birokrasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Politik. 1,(1), 118-133. https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.1.1.2010.118-133

Neill, M. O. (2013). The NVivo Toolkit. Na.

Ngusmanto, N. (2016). Pilkada 2015 and patronage practice among bureaucrat in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Asian Social Science. 12,(9), 236-243. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v12n9p236

Nurwana, M. A. (2016). Evaluasi Lelang Jabatan Di Lingkungan Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Tengah Tahun 2013-2014 (Studi Penelitian Pada Eselon III Dan IV Di Dinas Bina Marga Dan Dinas Pemuda Dan Olahraga). Journal of Politic and Goverment Studies. 5,(2), 301-310

Pratiwi, P. (2015). Bureaucratic Reform in Indonesia : Innovation , Challenges and Typologies. International Institute of Administrative Science - AGPA.

Prijono, T. (2019). Civil Service Reform in Indonesia: Redefining the Ethics. Management Studies. 7,(5), 435-442. https://doi.org/10.17265/2328-2185/2019.05.004

Robinson, M. (2015). From Old Public Administration to the New Public Service Implications for Public Sector Reform in Developing Countries. UNDP Global Centre for Public Service Excellence.

Schiampo-Campo, S., & Sundaram, P. (2001). To serve and to preserve. Asian Development Bank.

Soebhan, S. R. (2000). Model Reformasi Birokrasi Indonesia. Ppw Lipi.

Stančetić, V. (2020). Spoils System Is Not Dead: The Development and Effectiveness of the Merit System in Western Balkans. Croatian and Comparative Public Administration, 20(3), 415–438. https://doi.org/10.31297/hkju.20.3.1

Sulistiawaty, A. E. (2016). Peran BAPERJAKAT dalam Promosi Jabatan pada Pemerintahan Kota Makassar. Government, 9(2), 71–80.

Swailes, S., & Blackburn, M. (2016). Employee reactions to talent pool membership. Employee Relations. 38,(1), 112-128. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-02-2015-0030

Syamsir, S. (2014). Public Service Motivation and Socio Demographic Antecedents among Civil Service in Indonesia. Bisnis & Birokrasi Journal. 21,(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.20476/jbb.v21i1.4038

Taptuk, E.E. (2017). Bureaucracy and Efficiency. Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_617-1

Tjiptoherijanto, P. (2012). Civil Service Reform in Indonesia : Culture and Institution Issues. Working Paper in Economics and Business, University of Indonesia.

Turner, M., Prasojo, E., & Sumarwono, R. (2019). The challenge of reforming big bureaucracy in Indonesia. Policy Studies. 43(2), 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2019.1708301

Wakhid, A. A. (2011). Eksistensi Konsep Birokrasi Max Weber Dalam Reformasi Birokrasi Di Indonesia. Jurnal TAPIs. 7,(2), http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/tps.v7i2.1540

Yusdar, Y., & Irwansyah, I. (2018). Rekonstruksi Hukum Lelang Jabatan Struktural Dalam Rangka Reformasi Birokrasi. Papua Law Journal. 1,(1), 101-118. https://doi.org/10.31957/plj.v2i2.583

Yusriadi, Y. (2018). Reformasi Birokrasi Indonesia: Peluang dan Hambatan. Jurnal Administrasi Publik : Public Administration Journal. 8,(2), 178–185. https://doi.org/10.31289/jap.v8i2.1824




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jwp.v9i2.53522

Copyright (c) 2024 Ella Lesmanawaty Wargadinata

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

 JWP (Jurnal Wacana Politik) Indexed By:

Google Scholar width=  Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE) WorldCat Indonesia One Search                 

 

 

Published By:

Departement of Political Science
Campus of Faculty of Social and Political Science
Universitas Padjajaran, Building D, 2nd floor
Jl. Raya Sumedang Km.21, Jatinangor, Sumedang

  

Lisensi Creative Commons Creation is distributed below Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.