E ISSN
POLITICAL POLARIZATION IN THE 2024 LOCAL ELECTIONS: AN ANALYSIS OF ITS IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS FOR LOCAL DEMOCRACY IN INDONESIA
Abstract
Regional head elections (Pilkada) are a crucial moment in Indonesia’s political dynamics, but in 2024, political polarization reached its peak, causing significant impacts on local democracy. This study aims to investigate the phenomenon of political polarization in the 2024 regional elections and analyze its implications for the sustainability of local democracy in Indonesia. Through a mixed approach that combines qualitative and quantitative analysis, this study attempts to understand the root causes of political polarization, measure the level of polarization in different regions, and evaluate the resulting political consequences. Political polarization in the context of the 2024 regional elections reflects the increasing tension between different political parties, especially in terms of ideological conflicts and differences in political views. It is influenced by factors such as national polarization, local political dynamics, and the increased use of social media as a tool to amplify divisive political narratives. The results show that political polarization in the 2024 local elections has far-reaching impacts on local democracy, including decreased public political participation, heightened political tensions, and the risk of social conflict that could potentially undermine political stability. The long-term implications of this political polarization highlight the need for appropriate measures to strengthen local democracy and rebuild public trust in the political process. In this context, efforts to promote inclusive political dialog, improve people’s political literacy, and reduce excessive political tension are crucial to maintaining the health of local democracy in Indonesia. Only with these measures can local democracy develop positively and embody strong and inclusive democratic principles amidst complex political dynamics.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aspinall, E. (2019). The Role of Identity Politics in Indonesia’s Political Polarization. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 5(2), 163-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2057891120903890
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). “The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics.” Information, Communication & Society, 16(1), 739-761. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.871880.
Benoit, K., Laver, M., & Garry, J. (2021). The party system and polarization: A comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 54(6), 987-1003.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414020956834
Berman, S., & Shapiro, I. (2018). Political Polarization and Its Effects on Democracy. Journal of Democracy, 29(4), 7-24.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2018.0048
Bishop, G. F. (2010). The Illusion of Public Opinion: Fact and Artifact in American Public Opinion Polls. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315709434
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674023072
Brewer, M. B. (1999). “The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate?” Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429-444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00126.
Castells, M. (2012). Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge: Polity Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1np7q1.
Coser, L. A. (1956). The Functions of Social Conflict. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203792665.
Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society. Stanford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400821321.
Diamond, L. (1999). “Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation.” Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/book.15462.
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445107
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804782065.
Fisher, R. J. (2000). “The Importance of Third Parties in Conflict Resolution.” In The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice, edited by Morton Deutsch and Peter T. Coleman. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463108319731.
Galtung, J. (1996). “Peace by Peaceful Means: Peace and Conflict, Development and Civilization.” Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446229834.
Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520241127.
Graham, T., Broersma, M., Hazelhoff, K., & van ‘t Haar, G. (2015). Between broadcasting political messages and interacting with voters: The use of Twitter during the 2010 UK general election campaign. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 692-716. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.785581
Hendrianto, A. (2021). Polarization in Local Elections: Lessons from Indonesian Pilkada. Journal of Contemporary Southeast Asian Studies, 53(2), 189-205.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17932814.2021.1945483
Jungherr, A., Schoen, H., & Jürgens, P. (2020). Social Media and Political Polarization: Dynamics in the Digital Age. New Media & Society, 22(4), 726-742.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819898288
Krieger, J., Müller, W., & Wessels, B. (2020). Global Political Polarization: Regional Trends and National Implications. International Political Science Review, 41(2), 197-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512118786694
Kuncoro, A., Subiyanto, I., & Yudhistira, M. (2021). Political Polarization and Public Opinion in Indonesian Pilkada: A Case Study. Asian Journal of Political Science, 29(1), 35-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2021.1881148
Kooiman, J. (2003). “Governing as Governance.” SAGE Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208324.
Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300181906.
Linz, J. J., & Stepan, A. (1996). Toward Consolidating Democracy. Journal of Democracy, 7(2), 14-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1996.0026
McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2016). Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. MIT Press.
McCoy, J., Rahman, T., & Somer, M. (2018). “Polarization and the Global Crisis of Democracy.” The American Behavioral Scientist, 62(1), 16-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764217749400.
Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2018). Populism and Political Polarization: A Comparative Analysis. Annual Review of Political Science, 21, 1-20.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-111027
O’Donnell, G. (1994). “Delegative Democracy.” Journal of Democracy, 5(1), 55-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1994.0002.
Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625065.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/958752.958757.
Pérez-Liñán, A., & Taylor-Robinson, M. M. (2019). Democratic Institutions and Political Stability in Comparative Perspective. Comparative Politics, 51(4), 543-562.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5129/0010415198238
Piven, F. F., & Cloward, R. A. (1979). Poor People’s Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail. New York: Vintage Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400821173.
Sartori, G., & De Benedictis, M. (2021). The Role of Media in Political Polarization: Case Studies from Indonesia. Southeast Asian Media Studies, 4(3), 65-81.
Setiyono, B., & Suyanto, A. (2020). Pilkada, Polarization, and Democratic Stability in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Politics, 13(3), 135-154.
Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400827995.
Schmitter, P. C., & Karl, T. L. (1991). “What Democracy Is... and Is Not.” Journal of Democracy, 2(3), 75-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1991.0040.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. SAGE Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983587
Snyder, C. W. (2000). “The Politics of Conflict Resolution: The Role of Power in the Peace Process.” In Peace and Conflict Studies, edited by David P. Barash. New York: M.E. Sharpe. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463100287001.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” Dalam The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by W. G. Austin and S. Worchel, 33-47. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05089-1_2.
Tilly, C. (2003). The Politics of Collective Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815636.
Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. Yale University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300231989
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473915480
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jwp.v10i1.58474
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhtar Muhtar, Budi Setiyono, Fitriyah Fitriyah, Nur Hidayat Sardini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
JWP (Jurnal Wacana Politik) Indexed By:
21.png)
Published By:
Departement of Political Science
Campus of Faculty of Social and Political Science
Universitas Padjajaran, Building D, 2nd floor
Jl. Raya Sumedang Km.21, Jatinangor, Sumedang
Creation is distributed below Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.