LOCAL POLITICAL DYNAMICS IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAM FOR INNOVATION IN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND EMPOWERMENT (PIPPK) IN BANDUNG CITY
Abstract
Local Political Dynamics in the Implementation of the Program for Innovation in Regional Development and Empowerment (PIPPK) in Bandung City examines how local political dynamics influence the implementation of the PIPPK policy. This study focuses on analyzing the interactions among stakeholders, including the Regional Governance Section of Bandung City, subdistrict heads, community leaders, and local political actors, as well as the challenges arising from these dynamics. The research qualitative primary data from in-depth interviews and field observations with secondary data from media documentation and previous studies. The findings indicate that local political dynamics affect decision-making processes, resource allocation, and the effectiveness of PIPPK implementation. Consistent support from the city government and synergy among stakeholders are key to the successful implementation of this policy. The study also emphasizes the importance of strategic approaches to enhancing transparency, decentralizing authority, and actively involving the community to address existing challenges. The findings of this study reveal that the interactions between local government, subdistrict heads, community leaders, and local political actors in the implementation of PIPPK in Bandung City are often shaped by political interests and power dynamics. Local government officials and subdistrict heads coordinate the program, while community leaders help facilitate its implementation. However, political actors sometimes influence decision-making, prioritizing political gains over program objectives. The main challenges include political fragmentation, limited community involvement, and the dominance of patronage networks, all of which can hinder effective collaboration and the achievement of the program’s goals in community empowerment and regional development..
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alia, S. & Maulana, J. (2019). Analisis Program Pembangunan Dan Pemberdayaan Kewilayahan Di Kota Bandung. politicon 1(2):193–204. https://doi.org/10.15575/politicon.v1i2.6463
Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for Sale: Clientelism, Elections and the State in Indonesia. New York: Cornell University Press.
Bawono, M. (2008). Persepsi dan Perilaku Pemilih Terhadap Partisipasi Politik dalam Pemilihan Umum Legislatif 2004 di Kabupaten Nganjuk. Jurnal M’POWER 8(8).
Begouvic, M. E. H., & Cuan, B. (2021). Money Politik Pada Kepemiluan Di Indonesia. Sol Justicia, 4(2), 105-122.
Budiardjo, M. (2017). Dasar Dasar Ilmu Politik, Jakarta: Gramedia
Creswell, J. (2010). Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogjakarta: PT Pustaka Pelajar.
Edward III, G. C. (1980). Implementing Public Policy. Conggresional Quarterly Press.
Fazarani, F. (2018). Pengendalian Program Inovasi Pembangunan dan Pemberdayaan Kewilayahan (PIPPK) di Kecamatan Batununggal Kota Bandung. Repository Universitas Padjadjaran.Hardiyansyah, d. (2022). Manajemen Strategis Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta : Gava Media.
Hawe, P. (1995). Evaluating Health Promotion: A Health Worker Guide. New South Wales: Mac Lenan and Petty Pty Limited.
Hirst, P. & Khilnani, S. (eds). 1966. Reinventing Democracy. Oxford: Blackwell Publisher
Hosio, JE. (2007). Kebijakan Publik & Desentralisasi. Yogyakarta: Laksbang.
Idrus, M. (2009). Metode penelitian Ilmu Sosial. Yogyakarta: Erlangga.
Islamy, I. (2006). Prinsip-Prinsip Perumusan Kebijaksanaan Negara. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Kristiawan, I., & Manuputty, A. (2022, March 20). IS/IT Strategic Planning Using Ward and Peppard Methodology (Case Study : Gallery Group). JATISI (Jurnal Teknik Informatika Dan Sistem Informasi), 9(1), 735-744. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35957/jatisi.v9i1.1553
Moleong, L.J. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung : Remaja Rosda Karya.
Parsons. (1994). The Integration of Social Work Practice. California: Wardworth.inc.
Pawson, R. (2006). Evidence-based policy: a realist perspective.” United Kingdom: Sage Publications.
Salsabila, N. (2023). Inovasi Percepatan Pembangunan dan Peningkatan Partisipasi Masyarakat di Kota Bandung.” Repository Universitas Padjadjaran.
Santoso, S. (2004). Dinamika Kelompok. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Suryani, N., Sugiharto, B.J. & Anggraeni, D. (2019). Peran Kecamatan Bandung Wetan Melalui Program Inovasi Pemberdayaan Pembangunan Kewilayahan (PIPPK). Jurnal Agregasi : Aksi Reformasi Government Dalam Demokrasi 7(2). 177-187. DOI: 10.34010/agregasi.v7i2.2314.
Vedung, E. (1998). Policy Instruments: Typologies and Theories. Policy Instruments & Their Evaluation. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.
Wumu, C., Lengkong, F., & Dengo, S. (2019). Dampak Program Keluarga Harapan Di Kecamatan Kema Kabupaten Minahasa Utara. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 5(77). Retrieved from https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/JAP/article/view/23801
Winarno, B. (2012). Kebijakan Publik: Teori, Proses, dan Studi Kasus. CAPS. Badan Pusat Statistik.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jwp.v10i3.60780
Copyright (c) 2025 Hafshah Talia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
JWP (Jurnal Wacana Politik) Indexed By:
Published By:
Departement of Political Science
Campus of Faculty of Social and Political Science
Universitas Padjajaran, Building D, 2nd floor
Jl. Raya Sumedang Km.21, Jatinangor, Sumedang
Creation is distributed below Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.