DISRUPTIVE RELIGION AND ETHICAL OPPOSITION: THE FORCE OF MORAL AUTHORITY IN INDONESIA’S DEMOCRATIC CONSOLIDATION
Abstract
This article argues that democratic consolidation in Indonesia cannot be explained solely through the performance of formal institutions. By foregrounding ethical opposition as a missing variable in dominant consolidation theories, it shows that democracy has also been sustained by a normative infrastructure that legitimizes critique beyond institutional arenas. Based on qualitative historical analysis of Abdurrahman Wahid’s and Ahmad Syafii Maarif’s oppositional practices under the New Order and in the post-Reformasi period, the article finds that moral authority enabled non-institutional opposition to constrain state power, normalize dissent, and protect democratic quality. While both figures articulated a corrective and non-subversive mode of opposition, they operated through different mechanisms: Wahid’s opposition was embedded in organizational networks that generated more direct institutional effects, whereas Syafii Maarif’s opposition worked primarily through discursive and normative interventions shaping the moral boundaries of democratic politics. Using the lens of disruptive religion, the article shows that religion functioned not as a political ideology but as a source of moral legitimacy compatible with democratic stability
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt183pnr2
Barton, Greg. (1999). Gagasan Islam Liberal Indonesia, Pemikiran Neo-Modernisme Nurcholish Madjid, Djohan Fffendi, Ahmad Wahib, dan Abdurrahman Wahid. Jakarta: Pustaka Antara.
Bernhard, Michael, Allen Hicken, Christopher Reenock, and Staffan I. Lindberg. (2019). “Parties, Civil Society, and the Deterrence of Democratic Defection.” Studies in Comparative International Development: 1-26.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.
https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Calhoun, C., Juergensmeyer, M., & VanAntwerpen, J. (2011). Rethinking secularism. Oxford University Press.
Casanova, J. (1994). Public religions in the modern world. University of Chicago Press.
Diamond, L. (1999). Developing democracy: Toward consolidation. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Diamond, L., & Morlino, L. (2005). Assessing the quality of democracy. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Feillard, Andree. (1999). NU vis-a-vis negara: pencarian isi, bentuk dan makna. Yogyakarta: LKIS.
George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Polity Press.
Hefner, Robert W. (2000). Civil Islam: Muslims and Democratization in Indonesia. Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv10vm2ns
Ishiyama, J. (2021). Political Parties and Democratization. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Retrieved 22 Dec. 2025, from https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-1974.
Latif, Yudi. (2017). Genealogi Intelegensia: Pengetahuan & Kekuasaan Inteligensia Muslim Indonesia Abad XX. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Levitsky, S., & Way, L. (2024). The Resilience of Democracy’s Third Wave. PS: Political Science & Politics, 57(2), 198–201. https://doi:10.1017/S1049096523000914
Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010). Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2019). How democracies die. Penguin Books.
Linz, J. J., & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Maarif, Ahmad Syafii. (1996). Islam dan Politik Teori Belah Bambu Masa Demokrasi Terpimpin. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press.
Maarif, Ahmad Syafii. (2006). Islam dan Pancasila sebagai Dasar Negara Studi Tentang Perdebatan dalam Konstituante. Jakarta: Pustaka LP3ES.
Maarif, Ahmad Syafii. (2019). Membumikan Islam dari Romantisme Masa Silam Meunuju Islam Masa Depan. Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD.
Maarif, Ahmad Syafii. (2020). Indonesia Jelang Satu Abad Refleksi Tentang Keumatan, Kebangsaan, dan Kemanusiaan. Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD.
Maarif, Ahmad Syafii. (2020). Islam dan Politik Upaya Membingkai Peradaban. Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD.
Maarif, Ahmad Syafii. (2020). Mencintai Autensititas daam Dinamika Zaman. Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD.
Maarif, Ahmad Syafii. (2020). Menerobos Kemelut Catatan-Catatan Kritis Sang Guru Bangsa. Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD.
Muzakka, A. K. (2023). Indonesian Pluralities: Islam, Citizenship, and Democracy , by Robert W. Hefner and Zainal Abidin Bagir (eds). Bijdragen tot de taal-, land- en volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia, 179(2), 287-290. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-17902004
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2004). Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O’Donnell, G. (1994). Delegative democracy. Journal of Democracy, 5(1), 55–69.
https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1994.0010
O’Donnell, G. (1998). Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies. Journal of Democracy, 9(3), 112–126.
Peruzzotti, E., & Smulovitz, C. (2006). Enforcing the rule of law. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Prior, L. (2003). Using documents in social research. Sage.
Slater, D. (2018). Party Cartelization, Indonesian-Style: Presidential Power-Sharing and The Contingency of Democratic Opposition. Journal of East Asian Studies, 18(1), 23–46. doi:10.1017/jea.2017.26
Smith, Christian. (1996). Disruptive Religion: The Force of Faith in Social-Movement Activism. New York: Routledge.
Tilly, C. (2007). Democracy. Cambridge University Press.
Wahid, Abdurrahman. (1983). Muslim di Tengah Pergumulan. Jakarta: Leppenas.
Wahid, Abdurrahman. (1992). “Pancasila Sebagai Ideologi dalam Kaitan dengan Kehidupan Beragama dan Berkepercayaan terhadap Tuhan YME”, dalam Oesman, Oetojo dan Alfian (Peny.), Pancasila Sebagai Ideologi dalam Berbagai Kehidupan Bermasyarakat, Berbangsa dan Bernegara. Jakarta: BP-7 Pusat.
Wahid, Abdurrahman. (1995). “Islam, Ideologi dan Etos Kerja di Indonesia” dalam Budhy Munawar-Rachman (editor), Kontekstualiasi Doktrin Islam dalam Sejarah. Jakarta: Paramadina.
Wahid, Abdurrahman. (1999). Prisma Pemikiran Gus Dur. Yogyakarta: LKiS.
Wahid, Abdurrahman. (2006). Islamku Islam Anda Islam Kita, Agama Masyarakat Negara Demokrasi. Jakarta: The Wahid Institute.
Wahid, Abdurrahman. (2007). Islam Kosmopolitan Nilai-Nilai Indonesia dan Transformasi Kebudayaan. Jakarta: The Wahid Institute.
Yanow, D. (2000). Conducting interpretive policy analysis. Sage.
Yanow, D., & Schwartz-Shea, P. (2014). Interpretive research design: Concepts and processes. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315793835
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jwp.v11i1.68917
Copyright (c) 2026 Savran Billahi, Idris Thaha, Suryani Suryani, Mohammad Ezha Fachriza
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
JWP (Jurnal Wacana Politik) Indexed By:
21.png)
Published By:
Departement of Political Science
Campus of Faculty of Social and Political Science
Universitas Padjajaran, Building D, 2nd floor
Jl. Raya Sumedang Km.21, Jatinangor, Sumedang
Creation is distributed below Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.