Perbedaan kebersihan sepertiga saluran akar dari debris setelah diirigasi menggunakan jarum bevel dan jarum side-vent  Differences of the one third of the root canal cleanliness after irrigation using bevel needles and side-vent needles

Niza Tapiza; Irmaleny Irmaleny; Anna Muryani

doi:10.24198/jkg.v30i1.17932

Perbedaan kebersihan sepertiga saluran akar dari debris setelah diirigasi menggunakan jarum bevel dan jarum side-vent
Differences of the one third of the root canal cleanliness after irrigation using bevel needles and side-vent needles

Niza Tapiza, Irmaleny Irmaleny, Anna Muryani

Abstract

Pendahuluan: Pembersihan saluran akar merupakan tahapan penting yang mempengaruhi keberhasilan perawatan saluran akar. Irigasi saluran akar menggunakan irigan yang dihantarkan melalui spuit dan jarum irigasi. Desain ujung jarum yang digunakan dapat mempengaruhi kebersihan saluran akar yang diirigasi. Bagian sepertiga apikal saluran akar merupakan bagian yang paling sulit untuk dibersihkan, terutama jika irigasi dilakukan dengan menggunakan spuit dan jarum. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perbedaan kebersihan sepertiga apikal saluran akar dari debris setelah diirigasi menggunakan jarum bevel dan jarum side-vent. Metode: Sampel yang digunakan sebanyak 30 gigi insisif sentral rahang atas yang telah diekstraksi. Gigi dibagi dua kelompok untuk diinstrumentasi dengan jarum protaper dan diirigasi menggunakan NaOCl 2,5%. Kelompok pertama diirigasi menggunakan jarum bevel dan kelompok kedua diirigasi menggunakan jarum side-vent. Kebersihan sepertiga saluran akar diukur melalui skor debris. Skor debris dari masing-masing kelompok kemudian diuji dengan uji t tidak berpasangan. Hasil: Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa kelompok yang diirigasi jarum side-vent dapat menghasilkan rata-rata skor debris lebih rendah (0,091) dibandingkan kelompok yang diirigasi jarum bevel (0,117). Uji statistik terhadap rata-rata skor debris menghasilkan nilai p>0,05 (p=0,095). Simpulan: Simpulan penelitian ini adalah tidak terdapat perbedaan signifikan pada kebersihan sepertiga apikal saluran akar dari debris setelah diirigasi menggunakan jarum bevel dan jarum side-vent.

Kata kunci: Debris, irigasi saluran akar, jarum bevel, jarum side-vent.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Root canal cleaning is an important part which will determine the success of root canal therapy. Cleaning is done by irrigating root canal with irrigant delivered by syringe and irrigation needle. Needle’s tip design can affect the result of root canal cleanliness after irrigation. One-third root canal apical would be the most challenging part to be cleaned, especially if the irrigation was done by syringe and needle. This study was aimed to find out the difference of the one-third root canal apical cleanliness from debris after irrigation using a bevel and a side-vent needle. Methods: This study used 30 extracted maxillary central incisors as samples. The teeth were then divided into two groups; each group was instrumented and irrigated with 2.5% NaOCl. The first group was irrigated using a bevel needle and the second group was irrigated using a side-vent needle. The first group was irrigated using a bevel needle and the second group was irrigated using a side-vent needle. The cleanliness of one-third of the root canal was measured through a debris score. Debris scores from each group were then tested by an unpaired t-test. Result: Result of this study showed that the group irrigated using a side-vent needle had a lower debris score (0.091) than the group irrigated using a bevel needle (0.117). Statistic test of the debris score mean resulted in p > 0.05 (p = 0.095). Conclusion: In conclusion, there was no significant difference in the one-third root canal apical cleanliness from debris after irrigation using a bevel and a side-vent needle.

Keywords: Bevel needle, debris, root canal irrigation, side-vent needle.

Keywords

Debris, irigasi saluran akar, jarum bevel, jarum side-vent, bevel needle, debris, root canal irrigation, side-vent needle.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Napte B, Srinidhi SR. Endodontic irrigants. J Dent Allied Scie 2015;4:25-30.

Vijaykumar S, GunaShekhar M, Himagiri S. In vitro effectiveness of different endodontic irrigants on the reduction of Enterococcus faecalis in root canals. J Clin Exper Dentis 2010;2:169-72.

Verhaagen B, Boutsioukis C, Heijnen GL. Role of the confinement of a root canal on jet impingement during endodontic irrigation. Experiment in Fluids 2012;53:1841-53.

Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Wang Z, Gao Y. Irrigation in endodontics. Briti Dent J 2014;216:299-303.

Murray P. A concise guide to endodontic procedures. London: Springer Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London. 2015. h. 149-51.

Grossman LI. Grossman’s endodontic practice. 12th ed. New Delhi: Wolters Kluwer Health. 2010. h. 263-70.

Gade VJ, Sedani SK, Lokade JS, Belsare LD, Gade JR. Comparative evaluation of debris removal from root canal wall by using endovac and conventional needle irrigation: an in vitro study. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry. 2015;4:432-6.

Basrani B. Endodontic irrigation: chemical disinfection of the root canal system. London: Springer International Publishing Switzerland. 2015. h. 48-53.

Gu L, Kim JR, Ling J, Choi KK, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices. J Endodontics 2009;35:791-804.

Shen Y, Gao Y, Qian W, Ruse ND, Zhou X, Wu H dkk. Three dimensional numeric simulation of root canal irrigant flow with different irrigation needles. J Endod 2010;36(5):884-9.

Boutsioukis C, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, Kastrinakis E, Wesselink PR, Van der Sluis LWM. Evaluation of irrigant flow in the root canal using different jarum types by an unsteady computational fluid dynamics model. J Endod 2010;36:875-9.

Abou-Rass M, Piccinino MV. The effectiveness of four clinical irrigaton methods on the removal of root canal debris. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982;54:323-8.

Wu MK, Wesselink PR. Efficacy of three techniques in cleaning the apical portion of curved root canal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995 Apr;79(4):492- 6.

Ghivari S, Kubasad G. Root canal debris removal using different irrigating jarums: an SEM study. Indian J Dent Res 2011;22:659-63.

Bahuguna N, Kumar VR, Manan R. Comparison of efficacy of various root canal irrigation systems in removal of smear layer generated at apical third: an SEM study. J Conser Dent 2015;8(3):252-6.

Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Loiola LE, Morgental RD, Leonardo RDT, Tanomaru-Filho DM. Efficacy of four irrigation needles in cleaning the apical third of root canals. Brazil Dent J 2013;24:21-4.

Vinotkhumar TS, Kavitha S, Lakshminarayanan L, Gomathi NS, Kumar V. Influence of irrigating needle-tip designs in removing bacteria inoculated into instrumented root canals measured using single-tube luminometer. J Endod 2007;33:746-8.

Snjaric D, Carija Z, Braut A, Halaji A, Kovacevic M, Kuis D. Irrigation of human prepared root canal-ex vivo based computational fluid dynamics analysis. Croat Med J 2012;53:470- 9.

Young, H.D and Freedman, R.A. 2000. University Physics. California: Addison-Wesley. 2000. h. 444-9.

Gulabivala K, Ng YL, Gilbertson M, Eames I. The fluid mechanics of root canal irrigation. Physiological Measurement 2010;31:R49-78.

Chen JE, Nurbakhsh B, Layton G, Bussmann M, Kishen A. Irrigation dynamics associated with positive pressure, apical negative pressure and passive ultrasonic irrigations: a computational fluid dynamic analysis. Aust Endod J 2014;40:54-60.

Holliday R, Alani A. Traditional and contemporary techniques for optimizing rootm canal irrigation. Dent Upd 2014;41:51-61.

Curtis TO, Sedgley CM. Comparison of a continuous ultrasonic irrigation device and conventional needle irrigation in the removal of root canal debris. J Endod 2012;38:1261-4.

Psimma Z, Boutsioukis C, Vasiliadis L, Kastrinakis E. A new method for real-time quantification of irrigant extrusion during root. Int Endod J 2013 Jul;46(7):619-31. doi: 10.1111/iej.12036. Epub 2012 Dec 13.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jkg.v30i1.17932