Peran nance holding arch dalam perawatan ortodonti kasus maloklusi kelas I dengan overjet besar  The role of nance holding arch in orthodontic treatment of class I malocclusion case with large overjet

Erlina Hasriati; Haru Setyo Anggani

doi:10.24198/jkg.v32i1.27467

Peran nance holding arch dalam perawatan ortodonti kasus maloklusi kelas I dengan overjet besar
The role of nance holding arch in orthodontic treatment of class I malocclusion case with large overjet

Erlina Hasriati, Haru Setyo Anggani

Abstract

ABSTRAK

Pendahuluan: Gigi yang protrusif dan berjejal parah sangat mempengaruhi estetika wajah seseorang, oleh karena itu kondisi ini perlu diatasi secara ortodonti karena dapat mempengaruhi kepercayaan diri dan kualitas hidup seseorang terutama wanita. Selain kebutuhan ruang, perawatan ortodonti yang dilakukan haruslah juga memperhatikankontrol penjangkaran yang optimal. Tujuan laporan kasus ini menyampaikan penatalaksanaan perawatan ortodonti maloklusi kelas I dengan overjet besar Laporan kasus: Seorang pasien wanita usia 25 tahun datang ke Klinik Spesialis Ortodonti RSKGM FKG UI untuk mendapatkan perawatan ortodonti karena kondisi giginya yang sangat protusif. Secara klinis diketahui bahwa pasien memiliki maloklusi kelas I dengan overjet 10 mm. Perawatan ortodonti dilakukan menggunakan breket preadjusted sistem MBT slot.022 serta penjangkaran NHA. Simpulan: Hasil perawatan menunjukkan senyum pasien yang lebih estetik dengan inklinasi gigi anterior dan overjet yang terkoreksi dengan baik. NHA bermanfaat sebagai penambah penjangkaran pada kasus overjet besar yang membutuhkan penjangkaran maksimum, sehingga dapat dijadikan alternatif pilihan alat penambah penjangkaran dalam perawatan ortodonti cekat.

Kata Kunci: Protrusif, nance holding arch (NHA), overjet besar.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Protrusive teeth and severe congestion highly affect the face aesthetical aspects; therefore, this condition needs to be treated orthodontically because it can affect the self-confidence and quality of life, especially in women. In addition to space requirements, orthodontic treatment must also pay attention to optimal anchoring control. The purpose of this case report was to deliver the management of class I malocclusion orthodontic with a large overjet. Case report: A 25-years-old female patient came to the Orthodontic Specialist Clinics of University of Indonesia Dental Hospital to get orthodontic treatment because of very protrusive teeth. From the clinical examination, the patient has a class I malocclusion with a 10 mm overjet. Orthodontic treatment was performed using pre-adjusted brackets with MBT slot .022 system and NHA anchoring. Conclusion: The treatment result showed a more aesthetic smile of the patient with well corrected anterior tooth inclination and overjet. NHA is useful as an anchoring enhancer in large overjet cases which require maximum anchoring so that it can be used as an alternative anchor enhancement tool in fixed orthodontic treatment.

Keywords: Protrusive, nance holding arch (NHA), large overjet.

Keywords

Protrusif; nance holding arch (NHA); overjet besar

Full Text:

PDF

References

Daftar pustaka

Jung MH. An evaluation of self-esteem and quality of life in orthodontic patients: Effects of crowding and protrusion. Angle Orthod. 2015; 85(5): 812-819. DOI: 10.2319/091814.1

Johal A, Alyaqoobi I, Patel R, Cox S. The impact of orthodontic treatment on quality of life and self-esteem in adult patients. Eur J Orthod. 2015;37(3):233-237. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cju047

Gazit-Rappaport T, Haisraeli-Shalish M, Gazit E. Psychosocial reward of orthodontic treatment in adult patients. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32(4):441-446. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjp144

De Couto Nascimento V, De Castro Ferreira Conti AC, De Almeida Cardoso M, Valarelli DP, De Almeida-Pedrin RR. Impact of orthodontic treatment on self-esteem and quality of life of adult patients requiring oral rehabilitation. Angle Orthod. 2016;86(5):839-845. DOI: 10.2319/072215-496.1

Al-Awadhi EA, Garvey TM, Alhag M, Claffey NM, O’Connell B. Efficacy of the Nance appliance as an anchorage-reinforcement method. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2015; 147(3): 330-338. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.11.014

Sandler J, Murray A, Thiruvenkatachari B, Gutierrez R, Speight P, O’Brien K. Effectiveness of 3 methods of anchorage reinforcement for maximum anchorage in adolescents: A 3-arm multicenter randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2014;146(1):10-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.03.020

Stivaros N, Lowe C, Dandy N, Doherty B, Mandall NA. A randomized clinical trial to compare the Goshgarian and Nance palatal arch. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32(2):171-176. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjp075

Arikan V, Kizilci E, Ozalp N, Ozcelik B. Effects of fixed and removable space maintainers on plaque accumulation, periodontal health, candidal and enterococcus faecalis carriage. Med Princ Pract. 2015;24(4):311-317. DOI:10.1159/000430787

Almuzian M, Alharbi F, Chung LL-K, McIntyre G. Transpalatal, nance and lingual arch appliances: clinical tips and applications. Orthod Updat. 2017;8(3):92-100. DOI: 10.12968/ortu.2015.8.3.92

Felemban N, Hassan A, Murshid Z, Al-Sulaimani F. En masse retraction versus two-step retraction of anterior teeth in extraction treatment of bimaxillary protrusion. J Orthod Sci. 2013;2(1):28-37. DOI: 10.4103/2278-0203.110330

Schneider PP, Júnior LGG, Da Costa Monini A, Dos Santos Pinto A, Kim KB. Comparison of anterior retraction and anchorage control between en masse retraction and two-step retraction: A randomized prospective clinical trial. Angle Orthod. 2019;89(2):190-199. DOI: 10.2319/051518-363.1

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jkg.v32i1.27467