Implementation of Government Performance Accountability System (SAKIP) in Indonesian Local Government (Case of Regional Development Planning Board of Sukabumi Regency)

Tomi Setianto; Sinta Ningrum; Didin Muhafidin

doi:10.24198/jmpp.v5i1.34738

Implementation of Government Performance Accountability System (SAKIP) in Indonesian Local Government (Case of Regional Development Planning Board of Sukabumi Regency)

Tomi Setianto, Sinta Ningrum, Didin Muhafidin

Abstrak

The use of performance measurement system in the public sector (PMS) has become a panacea in addressing an inefficient bureaucracy that fails to meet the citizen satisfaction by its lethargic service delivery. It has introduced a way for public managers to better generate outcome policy into a concrete-measurable actions. While many countries already demonstrates the benefit of using the system, Indonesia remain struggle in implementing the ideal of performance management particularly in the context of local government that usually lacking of adequate capacity and sources. Despite the continuous support by central government, the diverse of socio-environmental context hinder local government to fully implements of SAKIP. This paper sought to portray the implementation and challenges that is faced by one local government agencies in Sukabumi, West Java Indonesia in implementing Indonesian public performance management system (SAKIP).

This paper is using qualitative approach by conducting structured interview to key informants. The results showed that organizational variables have been able to accommodate the implementation of SAKIP policy through units formed specifically in organizational structure and governance regulations, organizational interpretation variables are still necessary to improve the dissemination of policy information to all levels of employees, application variables where the implementation of policies are still experiencing constraints, especially in planning and evaluation, as well as a lack of specific strategies in improving organizational performance. This paper reinforces the results of previous studies related with performance management system in Indonesian local government that its implementation has not been yet showing their best result.

Kata Kunci

SAKIP; performance management system; local government; accountability; Sukabumi

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi

Ahyaruddin, M., & Akbar, R. (2018). Indonesian Local Government’s Accountability and Performance: the Isomorphism Institutional Perspective. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Investasi, 19(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.190187

Akbar, R. (2011). Performance Measurement and Accountability in Indonesian Local Government. (July).

Akbar, R., Pilcher, R. A., & Perrin, B. (2015). Implementing performance measurement systems: Indonesian local government under pressure. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-03-2013-0013

Barzelay, M. (2001). The New Public Management: Improving Research and Policy Dialogue. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approach (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

De Lancer Julnes, P., & Holzer, M. (2001). Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation. Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00140

Dooren, W. Van, Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2015). Performance Management in the Public Sector. In Stephen P. Osborne (Ed.), Routledge (Second Edi). New Yor: Routledge.

Dye, T. R. (2017). Understanding Public Policy. In Understanding Public Policy.

Edward, G. C. (1980). Implementing Public Policy. Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

Frischtak, L. L. (1994). Governance Capacity and Economic Reform in Developing Countries. World Bank Technical Paper. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-2962-6

Hall, J. L. (2017). Performance Management: Confronting The Challenges For Local Government. Public Administration Quarterly, 41(1), 24. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/26383383?refreqid=excelsior%3A9e26fcae83490bd1f2b26a7b5a60a496

Horton, D., Alexaki, A., Bennett-lartey, S., Brice, K. N., Campilan, D., Carden, F., … Duong, L. T. (2003). Evaluating Capacity Development: Experience from Research and Development Organizations around the World. Canada: International Development Research Centre (IDRC).

Howlett, M., & Cashore, B. (2014). Conceptualizing Public Policy. In Comparative Policy Studies (pp. 17–33). https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137314154_2

IMF. (2002). The Role of Capacity-Building in Poverty Reduction. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/ib/2002/031402.htm#iv

Indah, C. L., & Raharja, S. J. (2020). New Public Management (NPM) as an Effort in Governance. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 3(2), 73. https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v3i2.25342

Jabarprov. (2017). Jabar Targetkan Kab/Kota Capai Predikat SAKIP Minimal ‘BB.’ Retrieved from https://jabarprov.go.id/index.php/news/21007/2017/01/25/Jabar-Targetkan-KabKota-Capai-Predikat-SAKIP-Minimal-BB

Jenkins, W. I. (1978). Policy Analysis: A Political and Organisational Perspective. London: Martin Robertson.

Jones, C. O. (1984). An Introduction to the Study of Public Policy. Monterey, California: Brooks/Cole Pub. Co.

Jones, G. R. (2013). Organizational Theory, Design, and Change: Seventh Edition. In Pearson. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.

Jurnali, T., & Siti-Nabiha, A. K. (2015). Performance Management System for Local Government: The Indonesian Experience. Global Business Review, 16(3), 351–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150915569923

Kemenpan-RB. (2019). Laporan Hasil Evaluasi Negara SAKIP Tahun 2019.pdf.

Kemenpan-RB. (2021). Menteri PAN-RB Serahkan “Rapor” SAKIP dan RB Pemda. Retrieved from https://www.menpan.go.id/site/berita-terkini/menteri-tjahjo-serahkan-rapor-sakip-dan-rb-pemda

Knill, C., & Tosun, J. (2012). Public Policy: A New Introduction. In Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0197901900000453

Lusthaus, C., Anderson, G., & Murphy, E. (1995). Institutional Assestment;: A Framework for Strengthening Organizational Capacity for IDRC’s Research Partners. Ottawa, Canada: International Development Research Centre (IDRC).

Mahmudi. (2015). Manajemen Kinerja Sektor Publik (Edisi Keti). Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.

Mahmudi, & Mardiasmo. (2004). Local Government Performance Measurement in The Era of Local Autonomy: The Case of Sleman Regency Yogyakarta. Sosiosains, Vol. 17, pp. 117–133.

Marlian, S., Sumadinata, W. S., & Sari, D. S. (2021). The Evaluation of Policy Implementation on ASN Performance Appraisal System. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 4(2), 177. https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v4i2.31048

Miles, M. B., Huberman, M., & Johnny Saldaña. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. In SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315701134-11

Mimba, N. P. S. H., Helden, G. J. Van, & Tillema, S. (2007). Public sector performance measurement in developing countries: A literature review and research agenda. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Vol. 3, pp. 192–208. https://doi.org/10.1108/18325910710820265

Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research, theory of management policy series. 512. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-349-20317-8_23%0Ahttps://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0907/ML090710600.pdf

Nurkhamid, M. (2008). Implementasi Inovasi Sistem Pengukuran Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah. Jurnal Akuntansi Pemerintah, 3(1), 45–76.

Osborne, D. E., & Ted, G. (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Plume.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2015). Organizational Behaviour 16th ed. (16th Editi). New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.

Smith, T. B. (1973). The policy implementation process. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405732

Sofyani, H., Akbar, R., & Ferrer, R. C. (2018). 20 Years of Performance Measurement System ( PMS ) Implementation in Indonesian Local Governments : Why is Their Performance Still Poor ? 11(1), 151–184.

Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The Policy Implementation Process: A Conceptual Framework. Administration & Society, 6(4), 445–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539977500600404

Wang, J. (2018). Performance Management in Local Government. In Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (pp. 1–5). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_1865-1

Law

Presidential Regulation of Republic of Indonesia Number 29 of 2014 on Government Performance Accountability System

Regulation of the Minister of Empowerment of the State Civil Apparatus of Republic of Indonesia Number 53 of 2014 on Technical Guidelines for Performance Agreements, Performance Reports and Procedures for Reviewing Performance Reports of Government Agencies

Sukabumi Regent Regulation Number 76 of 2016 on Organizational Structure and Work Procedure of the Sukabumi Regency Bappeda

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v5i1.34738