Effects of Implementation of The Policy on Postponing Benefits on Performance of the State Civil Apparatus at DKI Jakarta Provincial Government

Vivi Febriyanti, Vid Adrison

Abstrak


This study research views relation between incentives and enhancement of unit’s performance budget which is managed by human resources in DKI Jakarta Provincial Government. In this research using 62,568 data which is classified by 1,738 unit from 2017 – 2019 related to realization of budget and human resources.  By using Difference in Difference method in this research find that after implementing policy in delayed of incentives, it has a positive impact on realization budget of 12.75% in units affected by the policy with a significance level of 1%. In addition, the implementation the policy if the unit can not achieve the target  for two (2) concecutive months has a positive effects of 7.10% with significance level of 1%. This study recommends that the policy can be implemented if government concern in gender, education, and employee attendance in each unit, so the unit can achieve the target.  The findings research support the literature that policy which is includes the punishment has positive effects in improving performance unit and motivating employee performance.


Kata Kunci


Incentives; delayed of incentives; performance unit

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968

Bennett, N. (n.d.). Withholding effort at work: Understanding and preventing shirking, job neglect, social loafing, and free riding. Managing Organizational Deviance, 113-130. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452231105.n5

Bertrand, M., Burgess, R., Chawla, A., & Xu, G. (2019). undefined. The Review of Economic Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdz029

Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2002). How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? https://doi.org/10.3386/w8841

Budi Nugroho, Y. A. (2006). Penerapan Pola Insentif untuk Meningkatkan Kinerja dengan Teori Engineering Worthy Performance [Master's thesis].

Byrne, Z. S., Stoner, J., Thompson, K. R., & Hochwarter, W. (2005). The interactive effects of conscientiousness, work effort, and psychological climate on job performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(2), 326-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.08.005

De Clercq, D., Dimov, D., & Thongpapanl, N. (. (2010). The moderating impact of internal social exchange processes on the entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 87-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.01.004

Dickinson, D. L., & Masclet, D. (2015). Emotion venting and punishment in public good experiments. Journal of Public Economics, 122, 55-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.10.008

Easterby-Smith, M., Lyles, M. A., & Tsang, E. W. (2008). Inter-organizational knowledge transfer: Current themes and future prospects. Journal of Management Studies, 45(4), 677-690. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00773.x

Garbers, Y., & Konradt, U. (2013). The effect of financial incentives on performance: A quantitative review of individual and team-based financial incentives. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(1), 102-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12039

Guillen, P., Merrett, D., & Slonim, R. (2015). A new solution for the moral hazard problem in team production. Management Science, 61(7), 1514-1530. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1922

Hanida, R. P., Irawan, B., & Rozi, F. (2021). Dynamic governance capabilities in regional budget policy formulation to create Agile bureaucracy during COVID-19. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 5(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v5i1.34117

Ira Utami Agusputri. (2020). Dampak Penerapan Performance-Related Pay (PRP) Terhadap Performa Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN) dalam Penanganan Aduan Masyarakat : Kasus Program Smart City Jakarta [Master's thesis].

Irmayanti. (2004). Analisis Sistem Penggajian pada Unit Bisnis Strategis Antara-Reuters [Master's thesis].

Kidwell Jr., R. E. (2003). Withholding effort in organizations: Toward development and validation of a measure. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17(4), 537-561. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1023456319134

Kidwell, R. E., & Bennett, N. (1993). Employee propensity to withhold effort: A conceptual model to intersect three avenues of research. Academy of Management Review, 18(3), 429-456. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1993.9309035146

Lise, J., Seitz, S., & Smith, J. (2004). Equilibrium policy experiments and the evaluation of social programs. Equilibrium Policy Experiments and the Evaluation of Social Programs. https://doi.org/10.3386/w10283

Lu, X., & White, H. (2014). Robustness checks and robustness tests in applied economics. Journal of Econometrics, 178, 194-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2013.08.016

Michele Kacmar, K., Andrews, M. C., Van Rooy, D. L., Chris Steilberg, R., & Cerrone, S. (2006). Sure everyone can be replaced … but at what cost? Turnover as a predictor of unit-level performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 133-144. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.20785670

OECD. (2005). Performance-related pay policies for government employees. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264007550-en

Pynes, J. E. (2009). Human resources management for public and nonprofit organizations: A strategic approach (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Republic of Indonesia. (2003). Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 17 of 2003 concerning State Finance.

Republic of Indonesia. (2005). Government Regulation Number 58 of 2005 concerning State/Regional Financial Management.

Republic of Indonesia. (2006). Second Amendment to the Regulation of the Minister of Home Affairs Number 13 of 2006 concerning Guidelines for Regional Financial Management.

Republic of Indonesia. (2011). Regulation of the Minister for Empowerment of State Apparatus and Bureaucratic Reform No. 34 of 2011 concerning Position Evaluation Guidelines.

Republic of Indonesia. (2011). Regulation of the Minister for Empowerment of State Apparatus and Bureaucratic Reform No. 63 of 2011 concerning Guidelines for Structuring the Performance Benefit System for Civil Servants.

Republic of Indonesia. (2013). Regulation of the Head of the State Civil Service Agency Number 1 of 2013 concerning Provisions for the Implementation of Government Regulation Number 45 of 2011 concerning the Assessment of Work Performance of Civil Servants.

Republic of Indonesia. (2013). Regulation of the Head of the State Civil Service Agency Number 3 of 2013 concerning the Dictionary of Functional Positions for Civil Servants.

Republic of Indonesia. (2014). Law No. 5 of 2014 concerning State Civil Apparatus.

Republic of Indonesia. (2015). Government Regulation No. 30 of 2015 concerning the Seventeenth Amendment to Government Regulation Number 7 of 1977 concerning the Regulation of Civil Servants' Salaries.

Republic of Indonesia. (2015). Amendment to Governor Regulation Number 183 of 2015 concerning Local Tax Collection Incentives.

Republic of Indonesia. (2016). Regional Regulation Number 5 of 2016 concerning the Establishment and Composition of Regional Apparatuses for the Special Capital Region of Jakarta.

Republic of Indonesia. (2016). Regulation of the Governor of the Special Capital Region of Jakarta Number 49 of 2016 concerning Regional Performance Allowances.

Republic of Indonesia. (2019). Regulation of the Governor of the Special Capital Region of Jakarta Number 12 of 2019 concerning the Sixth Amendment atas Perubahan Gubernur No. 409 Tahun 2016 tentang Tunjangan Kinerja Daerah.

Rheny, R., Elita, R. F., & Perbawasari, S. (2021). The impact of remuneration policy on increasing lecturer’s motivation and performance at Padjadjaran University. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 5(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v5i1.34449

Roberia. (2009). Analisis Yuridis Perbaikan Sistem Remunerasi Pegawai Negeri Sipil Republik Indonesia [Master's thesis].

Sarin, R. K., & Winkler, R. L. (1980). Performance-based incentive plans. Management Science, 26(11), 1131-1144. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.26.11.1131

Sarwar, Aamir, et al. (2014). Performance Related Pay: A Comparative Study on Public and Private Universities. Gale Academic OneFile, 26.

Stevenane, & Glinow, M. V. (2010). Organizational behavior: Emerging Knowledge and Practice For the Real World (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Supandi, Y. S. (2017). Varieties of Civil Servants Remuneration Policy Reform: A Scenario Planning Analysis. International Journal of Administrative Science & Organization, 24.

Tracey,J.B., Sturnman, M.C, & Tews, M. J. (2007). Ability versus Personality: Factors that Predict Employee Job Performance. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administrastion Quarterly, 48(3), 313-322.

Wooldridge, J. (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, The MIT Press.

Wu, T. J., & Wu, Y. J. (2019). Innovative work behaviors, employee engagement, and surface acting: A delineation of supervisor-employee emotional contagion effects. Management Decision, 57 (11), 3200-3216. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2018-0196

Zahra, S. A., & Hayton, J. C. (2008). The effect of international venturing on firm performance: The moderating influence of absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(2), 195-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2007.01.001




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v5i2.36291

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.




 Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik Indexed By:

Google Scholar  Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE) WorldCat Indonesia One Search          
 

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.