Countering Democratic Disruption Amid The Disinformation Phenomenon Through Artificial Intelligence (AI) In Public Sector

R.A. Yashinta Sekarwangi Mega

Abstrak


In today’s era, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a groundbreaking technology that plays a vital role in shaping societies and revolutionizing various sectors. Many democratic countries are currently exposed to a variety of false information spread through social media. In politics, disinformation is often associated with the efforts of a particular movement or party to mobilize supporters against the moral order. The spread of disinformation causes the emergence of legitimacy problems in many democratic countries.   Citizen confidence in the credibility of official information in the news started to decline and shifts to alternative sources of information such as social media. Several countries that adhere to a democratic system make various efforts to fight the phenomenon of disinformation. The origins of the problems research want to examine the use of AI technology as an effort to overcome the spread of disinformation on social media. Furthermore, this research examines the challenges posed by AI disinformation and highlights several measures that democratic governments should adopt to mitigate its impacts. In summary, prioritizing the fight against disinformation in democratic countries is imperative to safeguard the integrity of democratic processes, enhance societal resilience, and foster an informed citizenry capable of making critical decisions for the collective benefit of the nation.


Kata Kunci


Artificial Intelligence (AI); Democracy, Disinformation; Facebook; Human Machine Collaboration

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Bassey. (1999). Case Study Research in Educationl Settings. Oxford: Marston Book Services Limited.

Bennett & Livingston. (2018).

Bennett & Livingston. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication, 122-139. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760317

Blanchette et al. (2021). Protecting Democracy in an Age of Disinformation : Lessons from Taiwan.

Boni. (2021). The ethical dimension of human–artificial intelligence collaboration. European View, 182-190. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/17816858211059249

BST. (2020). Troll factory’ spreading Russian pro-war lies online, says UK. Retrieved from Theguardian.Com: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/may/01/troll-factory-spreading-russian-pro-war-lies-online-says-uk

Burr et al. (2020). The Ethics of Digital Well-Being: A Thematic Review. In Science and Engineering Ethics. 26(4). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00175-8

Chadwick et al. (2018). Do tabloids poison the well of social media? Explaining democratically dysfunctional news sharing. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4255-4277. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818769689

Floridi et al. (2018). An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations. Minds and, 28(4), 689-707. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5

Gil de Zúñiga et al. (2021). WhatsApp political discussion, conventional participation and activism: exploring direct, indirect and generational effects. Information Communication and Society, 24(2), 201-208. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1642933

HLEG. (2018). A multi-dimensional approach to disinformation. Report of the independent High level Group on fake news and online disinformation. doi:https://doi.org/10.2759/0156

Horowitz et al. (2022). A Framework for Assessing the Role of Public Service Media Organizations in Countering Disinformation. Digital Journalism, 10(5), 843-865. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1987948

Humanity, I. A. (2020). IEEE Strategic Plan 2020-2025. Retrieved from The Professional Home for the Engineering and Technology Community Worldwide: https://www.ieee.org/about/ieee-strategic-plan.html

Iosifidis & Nicoli. (2020).

Iosifidis & Nicoli. (2020). The battle to end fake news: A qualitative content analysis of Facebook announcements on how it combats disinformation. International Communication Gazette, 82(1), 60-/81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048519880729

Jamieson. (2018). Cyberwar. Oxford University Press.

Kapantai et al. (2021). A systematic literature review on disinformation: Toward a unified taxonomical framework. New Media & Society, 23(5), 1301-1326. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820959296

Kurniawan. (2020).

Kurniawan. (2020). Digital Dilemma, Problem Kontemporer Adopsi Media Digital di Indonesia. Rajawali Pers.

Kušen & Strembeck. (2018). Politics, sentiments, and misinformation: An analysis of the Twitter discussion on the 2016 Austrian Presidential Elections. Online Social Networks and Media, 5, 37-50. doi:https://doi.org/https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.osnem.2017.12.002

Mishra. (2017). Age of Anger: A History of the Present (1st Americ).

Mofferz. (2020).

Mofferz. (2020). Analisis Kontekstual Hoaks, Emosi Sosial dan Populisme Agama. Societas Dei: Jurnal Agama Dan Masyarakat, 7(1), 3. doi:https://doi.org/10.33550/sd.v7i1.141

Newman et al. (2019).

Newman et al. (2019). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2019. Retrieved from In Digital News Repor: http://www.digitalnewsreport.org/survey/2019/how-younger-generations-consume-

Pomerantsev. (2014). How Putin Is Reinventing Warfare. Retrieved from Https://Foreignpolicy.Com/: https://foreignpolicy.com/2014/05/05/how-putin-is-reinventing-warfare/

Posetti et al. (2020). JOURNALISM , ‘ FAKE NEWS ’ & Handbook for Journalism. the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural.

Pratiwi & Asyarotin. (2019). Implementasi literasi budaya dan kewargaan sebagai solusi disinformasi pada generasi millennial di Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Informasi & Perpustakaan, 7(1), 65-80. doi:https://doi.org/10.24198/jkip.v7i1.20066

Rossini et al. (2021).

Rossini et al. (2021). Dysfunctional information sharing on WhatsApp and Facebook: The role of political talk, cross-cutting exposure and social corrections. New Media and Society, 23(8), 2430-2451. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820928059

Siaran, P. (2019). Kominfo Identifikasi 486 Hoaks Selama April 2019, Total Hoaks Sejak Agustus 2018 Sebanyak 1.731. Retrieved from Kominfo.Go.Id: https://www.kominfo.go.id/content/detail/18420/siaran-pers-no 95hmkominfo052019-about-kominfo-identification-486-hoaks-sedur-april-2019-total-hoaks-sejak-sejan-august-2018-sebanyak-1731/0/siaran_pers

Sikorsky. (2022).

Silverman. (2016). This Analysis Shows How Viral Fake Election News Stories Outperformed Real News On Facebook. Retrieved from Https://Www.Buzzfeednews.Com/.

Syahputra. (2017). Demokrasi Virtual Dan Perang Siber Di Media Sosial: Perspektif Netizen Indonesia. Jurnal ASPIKOM, 3(3), 457. doi:https://doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v3i3.141

Yuliani. (2017). Ada 800.000 Situs Penyebar Hoax di Indonesia. Retrieved from Kominfo.Go.Id.: https://www.kominfo.go.id/content/detail/12008/ada-800000-situs-penyebar-hoax-di-




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v7i1.48125

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.




 Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik Indexed By:

Google Scholar  Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE) WorldCat Indonesia One Search          
 

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.