Paradoxical Strategies for Winning Change in Government Bureaucracy
Abstrak
Bureaucratic reform in Indonesia has been a primary focus in efforts to enhance government efficiency and transparency. However, despite the implementation of various reform policies, data reveals that many government agencies still face challenges in implementing significant changes. This research aims to analyze the factors hindering the success of reforms, effective strategies to drive change, and the role of technology and political support in the process. The study focuses on the National Institute of Public Administration (LAN) as a case study due to its crucial role in Indonesia's bureaucratic reform. The findings indicate that paradoxical approaches, such as creating flexible roadmaps and promoting informal communication, can strengthen reform effectiveness. Additionally, consistent political support and ongoing training for employees are identified as key factors in fostering innovation and change within the bureaucracy. This study offers practical recommendations for decision-makers to improve the success of bureaucratic reform in Indonesia.
Kata Kunci
Teks Lengkap:
PDFReferensi
Almahdali, H., Sampe, F., Sulaiman, S., Puspita, M., Hendrawardani, B., Parinduri, R. Y., Tenri, A., Hendrayady, A., Arman, Z., & Prasetio, Y. E. (2024). Introduction to the Science of State Administration. Tri Scientific Education Foundation.
Beatrix, G., & Apriyansyah, H. (2022). Career Development of Functional Positions, Simpli ication of Organizational Structure, And Equality of Administrative Positions Into Functional Positions: A Literature Review. Journal of Sustainable Community Development (JSCD), 4(2), 129–140.
Denzin, N. K. (2018). The qualitative manifesto: A call to arms. Routledge.
Duhring, L., & Zerfass, A. (2021). The triple role of communications in agile organizations. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 15(2), 93–112.
Dwiyanto, A. (2021). Reformasi birokrasi publik di Indonesia. Ugm Press.
Figenschou, T. U. (2020). Social bureaucracy? The integration of social media into government communication. Communications, 45(s1), 513–534.
Hakim, A. (2020). Dinamika Pelaksanaan Good Governance Di Indonesia (Dalam Perspektif Yuridis Dan Implementasi) The Dynamics Of Good Governance Implementation In Indonesia (In The Juridical And Implementation Perspective).
Hamdillah, H. (2023). Inovasi Pelayanan Publik dan Transformasi Birokrasi. Resolusi: Jurnal Sosial Politik, 6(2), 91–102.
Hanafi, I. (2023). Reformasi kebijakan. PT Mafy Media Literasi Indonesia.
Heeks, R., Ezeomah, B., Iazzolino, G., Krishnan, A., Renken, J., & Zhou, Q. (2023). The Principles of Digital Transformation for Development (DX4D):: Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda.
Ismail, I., Fathonih, A., Prabowo, H., Hartati, S., & Redjeki, F. (2020). Transparency and corruption: does e-government effective to combat corruption? International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(4), 5396–5404.
Karunia, R. L., Budiaji, R., Suzana, R., Dewi, K. S., & Prasetyo, J. H. (2023). Analysis of the Factors that Affect the Implementation of E-Government in Indonesia. International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology, 10(3), 46–54.
Lestari, P., Ediningsih, S. I., & Fitriani, L. Y. (2022). Efektivitas Manajemen Komunikasi Bencana Berbasis Website. LPPM UPN Veteran Yogyakarta.
Maigahoaku, F. D., Fil, S., & Hanafi, I. I. (2024). Strategi Manajemen Organisasi Dalam Pendidikan. Nas Media Pustaka.
Nubala, A. A., Muhtar, E. A., & Buchari, R. A. (2024). Bureaucratic Reform at Bandung Departement of Culture and Tourism in the New Public Service Perspective. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 8(1), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v8i1.46476
Nugroho, R. A., & Purbokusumo, Y. (2020). E-Government Readiness: Penilaian Kesiapan Aktor Utama Penerapan E-Government di Indonesia (E-Government Readiness: Main Actor Readiness Assessment for E-Government Application in Indonesia). JURNAL IPTEKKOM Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan & Teknologi Informasi, 22(1), 1–17.
Park, A. Y. S., Krause, R. M., & Hawkins, C. V. (2021). Institutional mechanisms for local sustainability collaboration: Assessing the duality of formal and informal mechanisms in promoting collaborative processes. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(2), 434–450.
Prasojo, E. (2020). Memimpin reformasi birokrasi: kompleksitas dan dinamika perubahan birokrasi Indonesia. Prenada Media.
Rifdan, R., Haerul, H., & Zainal, H. (2024a). Kepemimpinan Organisasi Publik. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Rifdan, R., Haerul, H., & Zainal, H. (2024b). Public Organization Leadership. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Saharan, V. A., Kulhari, H., Jadhav, H., Pooja, D., Banerjee, S., & Singh, A. (2020). Introduction to research methodology. In Principles of Research Methodology and Ethics in Pharmaceutical Sciences (pp. 1–46). CRC Press.
Sari, A. R., & SH, M. S. (2024). Reformasi Pelayanan Publik. PT Indonesia Delapan Kreasi Nusa.
Sarjito, A. (2023). Understanding the Dynamics of Public Administration and Policy Implementation. Saraq Opat: Journal of Public Administration, 5(2), 76–88.
Sawir, M., Deepublish. Setiawan, I., IP, S., & Johannes, A. W. (2020). Public Service Bureaucracy Concepts, Theories and Applications. CV. Rtujuh Media Printing.
Setiawan, I., IP, S., & Johannes, A. W. (2024). Pengawasan Pemerintahan Dalam Ulasan Teori Dan Praktek. CV. Rtujuh Media Printing.
Shoimuna, M. D. (2024). Reformasi Birokrasi Dan Pelayanan Publik. Public Service and Governance Journal, 5(1), 239–257.
Subianto, A., & Si, M. (2020). Public Policy : Review of Planning, Implementation and Evaluation. Brilliant.
Zein, M. H. M. (2023). Bureaucratic Reform: The World of Bureaucracy and Government.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v9i1.48460
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.
Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik Indexed By:
21.png)
.png){kind=logo}
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.