Perbedaan hasil analisis sefalometri McNamara sebelum dan sesudah perawatan maloklusi kelas I protrusif bimaksiler

Eko Poetranto Soegiharto; Ida Ayu Evangelina; Endah Mardiati; Avi Laviana

doi:10.24198/pjdrs.v7i1.35816

Perbedaan hasil analisis sefalometri McNamara sebelum dan sesudah perawatan maloklusi kelas I protrusif bimaksiler

Eko Poetranto Soegiharto, Ida Ayu Evangelina, Endah Mardiati, Avi Laviana

Abstract

ABSTRAK

Pendahuluan: Protrusif bimaksiler mempunyai karakteristik profil konveks, relasi molar kelas 1, insisif rahang atas dan bawah protrusif. Ekstraksi empat gigi premolar rahang atas dan bawah menjadi pilihan perawatan. Analisis Mc Namara mengevaluasi variabel jaringan lunak, keras dalam arah sagital dan vertikal secara menyeluruh. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengukur perbedaan hasil analisis sefalometri Mc Namara sebelum dan sesudah perawatan maloklusi kelas I protusif bimaksiler dengan pencabutan empat premolar rahang atas dan bawah di Klinik PPDGS Ortodonti FKG UNPAD. Metode: Penelitian bersifat deskriptif analitik komparatif. Sampel berupa sefalogram lateral sebelum dan sesudah perawatan dari 15 pasien maloklusi kelas I protrusif bimaksiler yang dirawat dengan ekstraksi empat gigi premolar rahang atas dan rahang bawah di klinik PPDGS FKG UNPAD, diambil dengan metode purposive sampling, diolah dan dianalisis dengan t-test berpasangan. Hasil: Variabel canting bibir atas (p<0,05), sudut bidang mandibula (p<0,05), jarak insisif RA ke titik A (p<0,05) dan jarak insisif RB ke APog (p<0,05) menunjukkan perbedaan signifikan. Pengukuran variabel sudut nasolabial (p>0,05), titik A terhadap N perpendicular (p>0,05), condylion ke titik A (p>0,05), condylion ke gnation (p>0,05), LAFH (p>0,05), facial axis angle (p>0,05) dan pogonion ke N perpendicular (p>0,05) menunjukkan hasil yang tidak signifikan. Simpulan: Terdapat perbedaan analisis Mc Namara sebelum dan sesudah perawatan pada sudut bidang mandibula, jarak insisif atas ke titik A, jarak insisif bawah ke APog, cantinging bibir atas. Tidak terdapat perbedaan pada titik A terhadap N perpendicular, condylion ke titik A, condylion ke gnation, pogonion ke N perpendicular, sudut nasolabial dan facial axis angle.

KATA KUNCI: protrusif, insisif, ekstraksi, sefalometri, analisis

Differences in the result of MC Namara cephalometric analysis before and after protrusive bimaxillary class I malocclusion treatment: Research as descriptive

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Bimaxillary protrusive has characteristics are convex profile, class 1 molar relation, protrusive maxillary and mandibular incisors. Extraction of four maxillary and mandibular first premolar teeth is a treatment option. Mc Namara cephalometric analysis was used to evaluate the variables of soft tissue and hard tissue variables in the sagittal and vertical directions thoroughly. The aim of this study was to measure the differences before and after treatment bimaxillary protrusive class I malocclusion treatment accompanied by extraction of four first premolars at the PPDGS Orthodontic Clinic FKG UNPAD with Mc Namara cephalometry analysis. Methods: This research is a descriptive comparative analytic study. Samples are lateral cefalograms before and after treatment as many as 15 bimaxillary protrusive class I malocclusion patientst, which were taken by purposive sampling method, the data processed and analyzed by paired t-test. Results: Variable upper lip canting (p<0.05), mandibular plane angle (p<0.05), maxillary incisor to point A distance (p<0.05), mandibular incisor to APog distance. (p<0.05) indicates a significanting difference. Variable nasolabial angle p>0.05), point A to N perpendicular (p>0.05), condylion to point A (p>0.05), condylion to gnation (p>0.05), LAFH (p>0.05), facial axis angle (p> 0.05), pogonion to N perpendicular (p>0.05) indicates an insignificanting difference. Conclusions: Significanting differences before and after treatment seen in mandibular plane angle, maxillary incisor distance to point A, mandibular incisor distance to Apog, upper lip cantinging. Meanwhile nasolabial angle, point A to N perpendicular, condylion to point A, condylion to gnation, facial axis angle, pogonion to N perpendicular showed insignificanting results.

KEY WORDS: protrusive, incisive, cephalometry, analysis

Full Text:

PDF

References

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Littlewood SJ, Mitchell. Laura. An Introduction to Orthodontics. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019.

Proffit WR, Fields HW, Larson BE, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics 6th edition William proffit. 6th ed. Philadelphia; 2019. 278, 311 p.

Alhammadi MS, Halboub E, Fayed MS, Labib A, El-Saaidi C. Global distribution of malocclusion traits: A systematic review. Dental Press J Orthod. 2018;23(6):e1–10.

Rahmawati E, Hardjono S. Perawatan Maloklusi Kelas I Bimaksiler Protrusi disertai Gigi Berdesakan dan Pergeseran Midline menggunakan Teknik Begg. Maj Kedokt Gigi Indones. 2015;20(2):224.

Leonardi R, Annunziata A, Licciardello V, Barbato E. Soft tissue changes following the extraction of premolars in nongrowing patients with bimaxillary protrusion. Angle Orthod. 2010;80(1):211–6.

Bills DA, Handelman CS, Begole EA. Bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion: Traits and orthodontic correction. Angle Orthod. 2005;75(3):333–9.

Ziliwu Y, Hambali TS, Salim J, Mardiati E. Soft tissue profile analysis using Ioi’s method for dentoalveolar bimaxillary protrusion cases before and after treatment with extractions of four first premolars. Padjadjaran J Dent. 2008;20(2):75–82.

Shimazaki K, Otsubo K, Yonemitsu I, Kimizuka S, Omura S, Ono T. Severe unilateral scissor bite and bimaxillary protrusion treated by horseshoe le Fort i osteotomy combined with mid-alveolar osteotomy. Angle Orthod. 2014;84(2):374–9.

Mcnamara JA. A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod. 1984;86(6):449–69.

Hartono D, Anggani H, Karmiati M. Evaluasi Posisi Maksila dan Mandibula Secara Sefalometrik Setelah Perawatan Ortodonti Cekat Berdasarkan Analisis Steiner dan McNamara (Laporan Penelitian). J Kedokt Gigi Univ Indones. 2003;10:216–22.

Pradhan R, Rajbhandari A, Shrestha SL. McNamara’s Cephalometric Analysis of Adult Brahmins of Kathmandu. Orthod J Nepal. 2016;6(2):10–4.

Wu J, Hägg U, Rabie ABM. Chinese norms of McNamara’s cephalometric analysis. Angle Orthod. 2007;77(1):12–20.

Al-Barakati SF, Talic NF. Cephalometric norms for Saudi sample using McNamara analysis. Saudi Dent J. 2007;19(3):139–45.

Mattos CT, Marquezan M, Barroso Magno IBC, dos Santos Martins DG, Nojima LI, Nojima M da CG. Assessment of facial profile changes in Class I biprotrusion adolescent subjects submitted to orthodontic treatment with extractions of four premolars. Dental Press J Orthod. 2012;17(3):132–7.

Wholley CJ, Woods MG. The effects of commonly prescribed premolar extraction sequences on the curvature of the upper and lower lips. Angle Orthod. 2003;73(4):386–95.

Lu W, Zhang X, Mei L, Wang P, He J, Li Y, et al. Orthodontic incisor retraction caused changes in the soft tissue chin area : a retrospective study. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(108):1–7.

Kusnoto J, Kusnoto H. The effect of anterior tooth retraction on lip position of orthodontically treated adult Indonesians. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;120(3):304–7.

Kasmawaricin, Harahap N, Oeripto A. Lower Facial Height and Soft Tissue Changes in Bimaxillary Protrusion Cases. Sci Dent J. 2019;01:1–7.

Sharma JN. Skeletal and soft tissue point a and b changes following orthodontic treatment of nepalese Class i bimaxillary protrusive patients. Angle Orthod. 2010;80(1):91–6.

Nagmode S, Yadav P, Jadhav M. Effect of First Premolar Extraction on Point A, Point B, and Pharyngeal Airway Dimension in Patients with Bimaxillary Protrusion. J Indian Orthod Soc. 2017;51(4):239–44.

Sukhia HR, Sukhia H, Mahdi S. SOFT TISSUE CHANGES WITH RETRACTION IN BI-MAXILLARY. Pakistan Oral Dent J. 2013;33(3):480–5.

Hosseinzadeh-Nik T, Eftekhari A, Shahroudi AS, Kharrazifard MJ. Changes of the Mandible after Orthodontic Treatment with and without Extraction of Four Premolars. J Dent Tehran Univ Med Sci. 2016;13(3):199–206.

Alqahtani N, Alshammari R, Almoammar K, Almosa N, Almahdy A, Albarakati S. Post-Orthodontic Cephalometric Variations in Bimaxillary Protrustion Cases Managed by Premolar Extraction - A Retrospective Study. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019;22(May 2020):1070–7.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/pjdrs.v7i1.35816