Berbagai pertimbangan dokter gigi dalam memilih produk bahan tambal: studi observasional
Abstract
ABSTRAK
Pendahuluan: Dokter gigi sebagai pengguna dan pembeli produk bahan tambal tentunya memiliki berbagai pertimbangan dalam memilih produk bahan tambal yang akan digunakan dalam merawat pasien. Terdapat beberapa pertimbangan yang dipikirkan oleh dokter gigi saat memilih suatu produk material bahan tambal, diantaranya yaitu pertimbangan kualitas, pertimbangan harga dan pertimbangan-pertimbangan lainnya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat gambaran dari berbagai pertimbangan dokter gigi dalam memilih produk bahan tambal. Metode: Jenis penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif yang menggunakan teknik sampel insidental. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh dokter gigi yang terdaftar pada organisasi PDGI Kota Bandung, dengan sampel berjumlah 315 dokter gigi. Penelitian ini menggunakan kuesioner daring yang berisi 10 butir pertanyaan mengenai berbagai pertimbangan dari dokter gigi dalam memilih suatu produk bahan tambal, yang menggunakan skala Likert dengan skor 1-5. Uji validitas dari penelitian ini menggunakan uji bivariate pearson, sedangkan untuk uji reliabilitas menggunakan uji test-retest. Hasil: Setelah kuesioner dibagikan ke seluruh sampel, skor Likert yang didapatkan dihitung reratanya menggunakan microsoft excel. Secara berurutan berbagai pertimbangan dan skor Likert reratanya adalah: kualitas bahan tambal (4,83), kemudahan aplikasi (4,58), biokompatibilitas (4,56), ketersediaan (4,28), harga (4,18), pilihan personal (4,03), ulasan (4,00), diskon (3,60), merek (3,58), kemasan (2,97). Simpulan: pada penelitian kali ini penulis menyimpulkan pertimbangan kualitas, biokompatibilitas dan kemudahan aplikasi dari bahan tambal, merupakan 3 pertimbangan utama yang mempengaruhi dokter gigi dalam memilih suatu produk bahan tambal gigi. Sedangkan pertimbangan kemasan produk merupakan pertimbangan yang kurang diperhatikan oleh dokter gigi saat memilih suatu produk bahan tambal.
KATA KUNCI: bahan tambal gigi, pertimbangan, pemilihan produk
Dentists' Considerations in Choosing Dental Filling Material Products: observational Study
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Dentists as users and buyers of filling material products have various considerations in choosing filling material products to treat their patients. Several considerations are made by dentists when selecting and purchasing a filling material product, including quality considerations, price considerations, and other considerations. This research intends to see the overview of various considerations used by dentists in choosing dental fillings product. Methods: The type of this research is descriptive research using incidental sampling techniques. The population of this study were all dentists registered within the organization of PDGI in the City of Bandung, with a sample of 315 dentists. This research used an online questionnaire containing 10 Likert scale questions regarding various considerations from dentists in choosing a filling material product, with a score of 1-5. The validity test of this research used bivariate pearson, while the reliability test used test-retest Results: After the questionnaires were distributed to all samples, the Likert scores obtained were averaged using Microsoft Excel. Sequentially the various considerations and their average Likert score are: quality of filling material (4.83), ease of application (4.58), biocompatibility (4.56), availability (4.28), price (4.18), personal preference (4.03), product reviews (4.00), discounts (3.60), brands (3.58), and packaging (2.97). Conclusion: in this research the authors conclude that considerations of quality, biocompatibility, and ease of application in dental filling material products are the 3 main considerations that influence dentists in choosing a dental filling product. Meanwhile, consideration of product packaging is a consideration that dentists pay little attention to when choosing a product for dental filling materials.
KEY WORDS: dental filling material, choosing product, considerations
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Sari M, Ghaisani ME. Knowledge, Attitude, Practice (Kap) Dokter Gigi Pada Pemilihan Dan Pemakaian Resin Komposit Di Surakarta Dan Sukoharjo. JIKG (Jurnal Ilmu Kedokteran Gigi). 2020;3(1):20–8.
Ritter A V., Walter R, Boushell LW. Sturdevant’s art and science of operative dentistry. Sturdevant’s Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 2018.
Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls HR. Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials. 12th ed. Missouri: Elsevier; 2013. 721–724, 94–108 p.
Sakaguchi RL, Ferracane JL, Powers JM. Craig’s restorative dental materials. Craig’s Restorative Dental Materials. 2018. 1–340 p.
Council ADA, Scientific ON. Direct and indirect restorative materials. Journal of the American Dental Association [Internet]. 2003;134(4):463–72. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0196
Garg N, Garg A. Textbook of Operative Dentistry. 3rd ed. Textbook of Operative Dentistry. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2013. 500–507 p.
Christensen GJ. Are you using “gray-market” or counterfeit dental products? Journal of the American Dental Association [Internet]. 2010;141(6):712–5. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0262
McCabe JF, Angus Walls. Applied Dental Materials [9th ed]. Blackwell Pub. 2008. 113, 312 p.
Fuhrmann D, Murchison D, Whipple S, Vandewalle K. Properties of new glass-ionomer restorative systems marketed for stress-bearing areas. Oper Dent. 2020;45(1):104–10.
Wuollet E, Tseveenjav B, Furuholm J, Waltimo-Sirén J, Valen H, Mulic A, et al. Restorative material choices for extensive carious lesions and hypomineralisation defects in children: A questionnaire survey among finnish dentists. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2020;21(1):29–34.
Burke FJT, Mackenzie L, Sands P. Dental materials - What goes where? Class i and II cavities. Dent Update. 2013;40(4):260–74.
Haider Y, Dimashkieh M, Rayyan M. Survey of Dental Materials Used by Dentists for Indirect Restorations in Saudi Arabia. Int J Prosthodont. 2017;30(1):83–5.
Anwar I, Satrio B. Pengaruh Harga dan Kualitas Produk Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian. Jurnal Ilmu dan Riset Manajemen. 2015;4(12):1–15.
Apriando JP, Soesanto H, Indriani F. Pengaruh Kualitas Produk dan Ketersediaan Produk Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian dengan Citra Merek Sebagai Variabel Intervening (Studi Pada Konsumen Minuman Energi M-150 di Kota Semarang). Jurnal Sains Pemasaran Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Marketing Science). 2019;18(2):166–83.
Satyo MF. Pengaruh Diskon Harga, Merek Produk Dan Layanan Pelanggan Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Garmen. Jurnal Ilmu & Riset Manajemen. 2013;2(8):1–19.
Ordun G. Millennial (Gen Y) Consumer Behavior Their Shopping Preferences and Perceptual Maps Associated With Brand Loyalty. Canadian Social Science [Internet]. 2015;11(4):1–16. Available from: http://www.cscanada.net/index.php/css/article/view/6697
Kemendikbud RI. KBBI Daring [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2021 Oct 6]. Available from: https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/
Vincent CJ, Blandford A. How do health service professionals consider human factors when purchasing interactive medical devices? A qualitative interview study. Appl Ergon [Internet]. 2017;59:114–22. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.08.025
Sugiyono ProfDr. Metodelogi Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. 2012. 241 p.
BAILY P, FARMER D, JESSOP C, JONES D. Purchasing Principles and Management. Vol. 9th, Pearson Education. 2005. 1–5 p.
Jackson R.S. Weenas. Kualitas Produk, Harga, Promosi Dan Kualitas Pelayanan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Spring Bed Comforta. Jackson RS Weenas - KUALITAS PRODUK, HARGA, PROMOSI DAN KUALITAS PELAYANAN PENGARUHNYA TERHADAP KEPUTUSAN PEMBELIAN SPRING BED COMFORTA. 2013;1(4):607–18.
Susetyarsi T. Kemasan Produk Ditinjau Dari Bahan Kemasan, Bentuk Kemasan Dan Pelabelan Pada Kemasan serta Pengaruhnya Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Pada Produk Minuman Di Kota Semarang. Jurnal STIE Semarang. 2012;19–27.
Gurǎu C. A life-stage analysis of consumer loyalty profile: Comparing Generation X and Millennial consumers. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 2012;29(2):103–13.
Sudjatmika F. Pengaruh Harga, Ulasan Produk, Kemudahan dan Keamanan Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Secara Online Di Tokopedia. AGORA [Internet]. 2017;5(1). Available from: https://jurnal.ubd.ac.id/index.php/PE/article/view/86/49
Pelayanan Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian D, Pemasaran Online Melalui Jejaring Sosial Facebook S, Wajah P. ANALISA PENGARUH HARGA, PROMOSI.
Kodu S. Harga, Kualitas Produk dan Kualitas Pelayanan serta Pengaruhnya Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Mobil Toyota Avanza. EMBA. 2013;1(3):1251–9.
Mine N, Yazicioğlu Ç, Yildirim K, Kiliç NP. A Study on Determining the Criteria that Parents Consider When Buying Children’s Room Furniture. The XXIX TH International Conference Research for Furniture Industry [Internet]. 2019;6(4):679–88. Available from: http://dergipark.gov.tr/gujsa
Zaware N, Pawar A, Kale S, Surve M. Exploration Of Market Potential Towards Dental Material Brands: An Assesment with Preferences Of Dentist in India. International Journal of Psychososcial Rehabilitation. 2020;24(7).
Yu L, Westland S, Li Z, Pan Q, Shin MJ, Won S. The role of individual colour preferences in consumer purchase decisions. Color Res Appl. 2018 Apr 1;43(2):258–67.
Westland S. The relationship between consumer colour preferences and product-colour choices The relationship between color preference and the cognitive mechanism of furniture purchase decision View project Light and Human Factors View project [Internet]. 2015. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344296951
Steinhart Y, Mazursky D, Kamins MA. The process by which product availability triggers purchase. Mark Lett. 2013;24(3):217–28.
Servanda IRS, Reno Kemala Sari P, Ananda NA. Peran Ulasan Produk Dan Fot Produk Yang Ditampilkan Penjual Pada Marketplace Shopee Terhadap Minat Beli Pria Dan Wanita. Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis. 2019;2(2):69–79.
Apriyanti ME. Pentingnya Kemasan terhadap Penjualan Produk Perusahaan. Sosio e-kons. 2018;10(1):20.
Khuong MN, Tran NTH. The Impacts of Product Packaging Elements on Brand Image and Purchase Intention — An Empirical Study of Phuc Long’s Packaged Tea Products. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance. 2018;9(1):8–13.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/pjdrs.v7i2.41086
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Statistik Pengunjung
Padjadjaran Journal of Dental Researchers and Students dilisensikan di bawah Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License