Perbedaan penilaian kedalaman karies proksimal antara radiografi bitewing dan radiografi periapikal teknik bisekting: studi experimental

Shafira Wulan Rahmadani, Swasthi Prasetyarini, Supriyadi Supriyadi

Abstract


ABSTRAK

Pendahuluan:  Lokasi karies yang tidak mudah dijangkau seperti daerah proksimal gigi akan sukar diperiksa secara klinis sehingga dapat menggunakan pemeriksaan radiografis. Radiografi intraoral yang digunakan dalam kedokteran gigi adalah radiografi periapikal dan radiografi bitewing. Pada radiografi periapikal dapat dilakukan dengan dua teknik pengambilan, yaitu dengan teknik paralel dan bisekting. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah Untuk mengetahui perbedaan nilai kedalaman karies proksimal antara radiografi bitewing dan radiografi periapikal teknik bisekting. Metode: Jenis penelitian yang digunakan yaitu penelitian true experimental dengan desain post test only control design. Penelitian ini menggunakan sampel sebanyak 20 gigi yang dibuat karies. Gigi yang karies dilakukan radiografi dengan dua teknik yang berbeda, yaitu radiografi bitewing dan radiografi periapikal dengan teknik bisekting. Pengukuran kedalaman karies pada radiograf menggunakan aplikasi ImageJ. Pengukuran dilakukan pada semua hasil radiograf dengan kedua teknik yang hasilnya diubah menjadi gambar digital. Kedalaman karies diukur dari dari titik pertemuan garis terluar dan garis oklusal karies sampai ke titik terdekat karies dengan tanduk pulpa menggunakan satuan milimeter. Hasil: Pada radiograf bitewing memiliki nilai kedalaman karies yang terkecil sebesar 2,872 mm dan terbesar 4,692 mm, sedangkan pada radiograf periapikal nilai terkecil sebesar 3,213 mm dan terbesar 4,820 mm. Simpulan: Berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang telah dilakukan, dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan nilai kedalaman karies proksimal antara pemeriksaan radiografi bitewing dan radiografi periapikal teknik bisekting.

KATA KUNCI: Karies proksimal, radiografi bitewing, radiografi periapikal, teknik bisekting.

Differences in proximal caries depth assessment between bitewing radiography and bisecting technique periapical radiography: experimental study

ABSTRACT

Introduction:  Caries locations that are not easily accessible such as the proximal region of the tooth will be difficult to examine clinically so that radiographic examination can be used. Intraoral radiographs used in dentistry are periapical radiographs and bitewing radiographs. In periapical radiography can be done with two retrieval techniques, namely with parallel and bisecting techniques. The purpose of this study was to determine the difference in the value of proximal caries depth between bitewing radiography and bisecting technique periapical radiography. Methods: The type of research used is true experimental research with post test only control design. This study used a sample of 20 teeth that were made carious. Carious teeth were radiographed with two different techniques, namely bitewing radiography and periapical radiography with bisecting technique. Measurement of caries depth on radiographs using the ImageJ application. Measurements were made on all radiograph results with both techniques whose results were converted into digital images. Caries depth is measured from the meeting point of the outer line and occlusal line of caries to the closest point of caries to the pulp horn using millimeters. Results: On bitewing radiographs, the smallest caries depth value was 2.872 mm and the largest was 4.692 mm, while on periapical radiographs the smallest value was 3.213 mm and the largest was 4.820 mm. Conclusion: Based on the results of the research that has been carried out, it can be concluded that there is a difference in the value of proximal caries depth between bitewing radiographic examination and periapical radiographic bisection technique.

KEY WORDS: Proximal caries, bitewing radiograph, periapical radiograph, bisecting technique.



Keywords


Karies proksimal, radiografi bitewing, radiografi periapikal, teknik bisekting.

Full Text:

PDF

References


DAFTAR PUSTAKA

World Health Organization (WHO). Sugars and dental caries [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2022 Apr 9]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/sugars-and-dental-caries

Kassebaum NJ, Smith AGC, Bernabé E, Fleming TD, Reynolds AE, Vos T, et al. Global, Regional, and National Prevalence, Incidence, and Disability-Adjusted Life Years for Oral Conditions for 195 Countries, 1990-2015: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors. J Dent Res. 2017 Apr;96(4):380–7.

Kemenkes. Riset Kesehatan Dasar [Internet]. Vol. 1, Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Jakarta; 2018. Available from: https://www.kemkes.go.id/article/view/19093000001/penyakit-jantung-penyebab-kematian-terbanyak-ke-2-di-indonesia.html

Lely MA. Pengaruh (pH) Saliva terhadap Terjadinya Karies Gigi pada Anak Usia Prasekolah. Bul Penelit Kesehat. 2017;45(4):241–8.

Tarigan R. Karies Gigi. 2nd ed. Jakarta: EGC; 2013.

Salma AFF, Boenjamin F, Jeddy. Perbedaan Keparahan Karies Gigi Molar Pertama Pada Anak Usia 6-9 Tahun Dengan 10-12 Tahun. J Kedokt Gigi Terpadu. 2021;3:9–13.

Abuzenada B. Detection of proximal caries with digital intraoral bitewing radiography: An interobserver analysis. Saudi J Heal Sci. 2019;8(1):38.

Septina F, Agnizarridlo T. Pemeriksaan Radiografi Intraoral pada Unit Pelayanan Radiodiagnostik. Malang: Universitas Brawijaya Press; 2021.

Schwendicke F, Tzschoppe M, Paris S. Radiographic caries detection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015 Aug 1;43(8):924–33.

Bds MFI, Bds SA, Bds AM, Khan U. Comparison Of Paralleling And Bisecting Angle Techniques In Endodontic Working Length Radiography. In 2013.

Tatapudi R, Myla S, Gurugubelli U, Koneru J, K M, Bandaru S, et al. Comparison between the commonly used radiographic techniques for intra oral imaging in dentistry-A questionnaire study. Int J Dent Res. 2017;5(2):157.

Sukmana BI. Radiografi di Bidang Kedokteran Gigi. J Chem Inf Model. 2019;53(9):1689–99.

Terry GL, Noujeim M, Langlais RP, Moore WS, Prihoda TJ. A clinical comparison of extraoral panoramic and intraoral radiographic modalities for detecting proximal caries and visualizing open posterior interproximal contacts. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2016;45(4):1–7.

Mago J, Mutalik S, Gopalakrishna A, Tadinada A. Dosimetry and Diagnostic Accuracy of Intraoral and Extraoral Bitewings in Detecting Approximal Caries. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol [Internet]. 2019 Oct 1 [cited 2022 Apr 17];128(4):e153–4. Available from: http://www.oooojournal.net/article/S2212440319300410/fulltext

Takahashi N, Lee C, Da Silva JD, Ohyama H, Roppongi M, Kihara H, et al. A comparison of diagnosis of early stage interproximal caries with bitewing radiographs and periapical images using consensus reference. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2019;48.

Mohammad-Rahimi H, Motamedian SR, Rohban MH, Krois J, Uribe SE, Mahmoudinia E, et al. Deep learning for caries detection: A systematic review. J Dent. 2022 Jul 1;122:104115.

Ghozali I. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 23. 8th ed. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro; 2016.

Bramantoro T, Darmawan R, Setijanto, Palupi R, Zamzam A, Aghazy, et al. Dental caries and associated factors among primary school children in metropolitan city with the largest javanese race population: A cross-sectional study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2019;10(2):274–83.

Janjic Rankovic M, Kapor S, Khazaei Y, Crispin A, Schüler I, Krause F, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic studies of proximal surface caries. Clin Oral Investig [Internet]. 2021;25(11):6069–79. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04113-1

Rathee M, Sapra A. Dental Caries. StatPearls [Internet]. 2023 Mar 6; Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK551699/

Hung KN, Kretapirom K, Arayapisit T, Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri S. Adult age estimation in a group of Thai population by Tooth coronal index of mandibular first molar from horizontal bitewing radiographs. RSU Int Res Conf 2020. 2020;16(1):90.

Barros SE, Abella M, Janson G, Chiqueto K. X-ray beam angulation can compromise 2-dimensional diagnosis of interradicular space for mini-implants. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2019;156(5):593–602.

Nabihah KK, Novo M, Lubis P. The correlation of the change in vertical angulation of the beam in the bisecting technique to the length of the tooth. 2023;7(1):15–20.

Whaites E, Drage N. Essentials of Dental Radiography and Radiology. 6th ed. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2020. 574–612 p.

Khandelwal A, Jose J, Ajitha P. Early detection of dental caries - A review. Drug Invent Today. 2020;13(2):139–43.

Schwendicke F, Göstemeyer G. Conventional bitewing radiography. Clin Dent Rev [Internet]. 2020;4(1):1–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41894-020-00086-8

Secgin CK, Gulsahi A, Arhun N. Diagnostic challange: Instances Mimicking a Proximal Carious Lesion Detected by Bitewing Radiography. Oral Health Dent Manag. 2016;15(6):2–6.

Sato H, Silva JD Da, Lee C, Yonemoto H, Kuwajima Y, Ohyama H, et al. Effects of healthcare policy and education on reading accuracy of bitewing radiographs for interproximal caries. 2021;1–6.

Heryanto OE, Nehemia B, Iskandar HB. Vertical angulation mandibular first premolar tolerance in periapical projection radiography. J Phys Conf Ser [Internet]. 2018 Aug;1073(2):22008. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1073/2/022008

Primazetyarini AS, Suryonegoro H, Syahraini SI. Tolerance of vertical angle alteration on lower molar periapical radiographs in the laboratory. J Phys Conf Ser [Internet]. 2018 Aug;1073(2):22009. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1073/2/022009

C.White S. Oral Radiology (Principle and Interpretation). 7th ed. Vol. 53, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. 2013. 1689–1699 p.

Guerra P, Trujillo S, Coste R, Carmona C, Fra S. Vertical angulation mandibular first premolar tolerance in periapical projection radiography. 2019;23(5):654–63.

Williamson GF. Intraoral Imaging Basic Principles, Techniques and Error Correction. 2021;




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/pjdrs.v8i2.56517

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


       

      

  

Statistik Pengunjung

Creative Commons License
Padjadjaran Journal of Dental Researchers and Students dilisensikan di bawah Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License