Measuring patient satisfaction based on a cross-cultural adaptation of ACTA questionnaire: a cross-sectional study
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Patient satisfaction after orthodontic treatment is influenced by several factors. Variables such as gender, age, duration of treatment, compliance, and dentofacial improvement also contribute to the level of satisfaction. The aim of this study was to measure patients’ satisfaction with their orthodontic treatment using ACTA Questionnaire at the Orthodontic Clinic, Dental Hospital Faculty of Dentistry Universitas Indonesia. Methods: A cross sectional study to measure patient satisfaction. A validated patient satisfaction questionnaire consisting of five domains and 34 items, was used. The questionnaire was distributed to all patients who met the inclusion criteria via WhatsApp. This study included 120 respondents (93 females and 27 males). Results: The internal consistency of the total scale and the five domains was satisfactory. Respondents were most satisfied with Domain 1, which concerned the doctor-patient relationship and were least satisfied with domain 5, which addressed situational aspects. Patient satisfaction reflects the quality of health services. In this study, 51.6% of female respondents were satisfied with the treatment, but there were no significant differences between genders. Conclusion: The doctor-patient relationship remains the most important factor contributing to patient satisfaction. Age, gender, education level and socioeconomic status did not influence patient satisfaction. .
KEY WORDS: patient satisfaction, cross-cultural adaptation, ACTA questionnaire, risk factors, socioeconomic.
Kepuasan pasien diukur menggunakan adaptasi lintas budaya kuesioner ACTA: Studi cross-sectional
ABSTRAK
Pendahuluan: Kepuasan pasien setelah perawatan ortodonti dipengaruhi oleh beberapa faktor. Faktor-faktor seperti jenis kelamin, usia, durasi pengobatan, kepatuhan, dan perbaikan dentofasial juga terlihat berkontribusi pada tingkat kepuasan. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengukur kepuasan pasien terhadap perawatan ortodontik menggunakan ACTA Questionnaire di Klinik Ortodontik Rumah Sakit Gigi Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Indonesia. Metode: Untuk mengukur kepuasan pasien, digunakan kuesioner yang divalidasi tentang kepuasan pasien yang terdiri dari 5 domain dan 34 items. Kuesioner dikirim ke semua pasien yang sesuai dengan kriteria inklusi melalui WhatsApp. Penelitian ini melibatkan 120 responden, yang terdiri dari 93 perempuan dan 27 laki-laki. Hasil: Konsistensi internal dari skala total dan 5 domain memuaskan. Responden paling puas dalam domain 1 mengenai hubungan dokter-pasien dan paling tidak puas dalam domain 5 pada aspek situasional. Kepuasan pasien adalah hasil dari pelayanan kesehatan yang baik. Dalam penelitian ini 51,6% responden perempuan puas dengan perawatan ortodonti, tetapi tidak ada perbedaan yang signifikan antara jenis kelamin. Simpulan: Hubungan dokter-pasien tetap menjadi faktor terpenting yang berkontribusi pada kepuasan pasien. Usia, jenis kelamin, pendidikan dan faktor sosial-ekonomi tidak mempengaruhi kepuasan pasien.
KATA KUNCI: kepuasan pasien, adaptasi lintas budaya, kuesioner ACTA, faktor resiko, sosio-ekonomi
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
REFERENCES
Jawad Z, Bates C, Hodge T. Who needs orthodontic treatment? Who gets it? And who wants it? Br Dent J. 2015;218(3):99-103. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.51
Choi SH, Kim BI, Cha JY, Hwang CJ. Impact of malocclusion and common oral diseases on oral health-related quality of life in young adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015;147(5):587-595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.12.025
Cobourne M, DiBiase A. Handbook of Orthodontics. 2nd ed. Elsevier; 2015. p. 24-31.
Alhammadi MS, Halboub E, Fayed MS, Labib A, El-Saidi C. Global distribution of malocclusion traits: a systematic review. Dental Press J Orthod. 2018;23(6):1-10
Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan. Laporan Nasional RISKESDAS 2018. Jakarta: Kemenkes RI; 2018. p.186-200.
Badan Pusat Statistik. Ekonomi Indonesia. Jakarta (ID): Badan Pusat Statistik; 2023. Available from: https://www.bps.go.id
de Sousa ET, da Silva BF, Maia FBM, Forte FDS, Sampaio FC. Perception of children and mothers regarding dental aesthetics and orthodontic treatment need: a cross-sectional study. Prog Orthod. 2016;17:37
Dewi R, Nugroho RS. Daftar 7 perawatan gigi yang ditanggung BPJS Kesehatan. CNN Indonesia [Internet]. 2022.
Eliza Y, Apriyeni D, Sutiyem S, Trismiyanti D. What Factors Affecting Patient Satisfaction? Adpebi International J Multidisciplinary Sci. 2024;3(1):64–70. https://doi.org/10.54099/aijms.v3i1.836
Lee R, Hwang S, Lim H, Cha JY, Kim KH, Chung CJ. Treatment satisfaction and its influencing factors among adult orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018;153(6):808-817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.09.015
Wong L, Ryan FS, Christensen LR, Cunningham SJ. Factors influencing satisfaction with the process of orthodontic treatment in adult patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018;153(3):362–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.07.017
Keles F, Bos A. Satisfaction with orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthodontists.2013.doi:10.2319/092112-754.1.p.507-511
Khan S. Assessment of satisfaction level among orthodontic patients. Pak Oral Dent J. 2014;34(3):651-655.
Aljughauman A, Alshammari A, Althumairi A, et al. Patient satisfaction with orthodontic treatment received in public and private hospitals in Dammam, Saudi Arabia. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018;6(8):1492–1497. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.301
Smith DS, Pandis N, Bister D, Seehra J. Clinical communication in orthodontics: Any question? J. Orthod. 2022;49(4):448–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/14653125221084314
Obilade OA, da Costa OO, Sanu OO. Patient/parent expectations of orthodontic treatment. Int Orthod. 2017;15(1):82–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2016.12.005
AlQuraini N, Shah R, Cunningham SJ. Perceptions of outcomes of orthodontic treatment in adolescent patients: a qualitative study. Eur J Orthod. 2019;41(3):294–300. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjy071
Pereira CP, Abreu LG, Dick BD, Canto GDL, Paiva SM, Flores-Mir C. Angle Orthod. 2016;86(3):495–508. https://doi.org/10.2319/040615-227.1
Rumah Sakit Khusus Gigi dan Mulut Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta (ID): Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Indonesia; Available from: https://fkg.ui.ac.id/rskgm/
Oxford University Press. Overview: Index of Complexity, Outcome, and Need (ICON). Oxford Reference. 2019. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100000958
Krisnawati M, Purwanegara MK, Widayati R, Kusdhany L. Patient satisfaction with orthodontic treatment. J Int Dent Med Res. 2023;16(4):1539-1545.
Utari E, Krisnawati, Ismah N. Relationship between orthodontic treatment outcome and patient satisfaction. J Int Dent Med Res. 2020;10(Special Issue):503–514.
Selvitopu A, Kaya M. A Meta-Analytic Review of the Effect of Socioeconomic Status on Academic Performance. J Educ. 2021;203(4):768–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220574211031978
Sabrina AP, Purbiati M, Krisnawati. Association between socio-economic status and self-perceived orthodontic treatment needs… J Int Dent Med Res. 2020;13(4): 1334–1340
Brown M, Wiltshire W, de Sa Leitão FH, Schönwetter DJ. Adult patient preference for an orthodontic care provider in Canada. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022;162(4):477–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.04.035
Direct to consumer orthodontics: Exploring patient demographic trends and preferences — Okuda BC, Tabbaa S, Edmonds M, Toubouti Y, Saltaji H. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021;159(2):210–216.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.12.024
Saccomanno S, Saran S, Laganà D, Mastrapasqua RF, Grippaudo C. Motivation, perception, and behavior of the adult orthodontic patient: a survey analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:2754051. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2754051
Lin F, Ren M, Yao L, He Y, Guo J, Ye Q. Psychosocial impact of dental esthetics regulates motivation to seek orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016;150(3):476-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.02.024
Kusaibati AM, Sultan K, Hajeer MY, Burhan AS, Alam MH. Adult patient expectations and satisfaction: Can They be influences by viewing the three-dimensional predicted outcome before fixed orthodontic treatment of dental crowding? J World Fed. Orthod. 2023;12(6):269-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2023.08.005
Meric P, Naoumova J. Did the COVID-19 pandemic affect orthodontic treatment outcomes? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022;162(1): e44-e51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.12.017
AlHammadi HA, Ferguson DJ, Makki L. Index of Complexity, Outcome, and Need (ICON) in Dubai school-aged adolescents. APOS Trends Orthod. 2020;10(1):32–37. https://doi.org/10.25259/APOS_14_2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/pjdrs.v9i3.67436
DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.24198/pjdrs.v9i3.67436.g26942
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
All publications by the Universitas Padjadjaran [e-ISSN: 2656-985X], are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License .





.png)

