UPI LABORATORY REGULATION EVALUATION: CASE STUDY AGAINST LABSCHOOL UPI SCHOOL

Prayoga Bestari

doi:10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v25i3.30914

UPI LABORATORY REGULATION EVALUATION: CASE STUDY AGAINST LABSCHOOL UPI SCHOOL

Prayoga Bestari

Abstract

Management in each laboratory school is different from other schools in general. This research is a description of the policy evaluation on the regulation of laboratory schools that will provide educational services to students as expected (vision and mission of the lab school), become a place for developing various teacher and educational practices in teacher professional education, and a place for the development of various educational innovations. Laboratory schools are places where prospective professional teachers practice and develop educational innovations and act as model schools for creative and innovative learning practices for prospective professional teachers. By using a qualitative approach and a case study method, this study seeks to provide an overview of the laboratory school regulations in UPI. The results showed that, UPI PTNbh already has a special regulation on laboratory school governance, namely Rector Regulation No.4439 / UN40 / HK / 2019 concerning UPI School Organizing Bodies. Management of educational units at a certain level by educational units at other levels, needs to be affirmed by strong rules and needs to be operated effectively. Good and fair which is reflected in the dynamics of management, there is a proportional distribution of authority and a strategic distribution of power. The strategic division of power is characterized by the sharing of legal powers that are binding and obeyed which do not create multiple perceptions and harm the community using education.

Keywords

laboratory school; management; policy evaluation; professional; regulation

Full Text:

PDF

References

Al Muchtar, Suwarma. (2015). Dasar Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Gelar Potensi Mandiri.

Arar, K. (2019). Arab Principals’ and Teachers’ Perceptions of Trust and Regulation and Their Contribution to School Processes. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 18(4), 648–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2018.1475576

Ball, S.J., K. Hoskins, M. Maguire, and A. Braun. 2009. Disciplinary texts: A policy analysis of national and local behaviour policies. Paper presented at British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, September 2–5, Manchester, UK

Bestari, P. (2020). QUOVADIS LAB SCHOOL REGULATION POLICY IN LPTK. Sosiohumaniora, 22(2), 250-258.

Bestari, P., Sinaga, O., Roespinoedji, D. (2019). Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation of Policies in Regional Government as A Student of Essential Material Civic Education. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. www.ijicc.net Volume 6, Issue 7, 2019

Bestari, P., Sinaga, O., Saudi, M. H. M. (2019). Implementation of Online Tax System: Implications for the Development of a Public Policy course. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. www.ijicc.net Volume 6, Issue 7, 2019

Fitrah, M. (2017). Peran Kepala Sekolah Dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Pendidikan. Jurnal Penjaminan Mutu, 3(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.25078/jpm.v3i1.90

Irawan, A., & Satori, D. (2013). Pengaruh Regulasi, Pembiayaan Dan Partisipasi Masyarakat Terhadap Efektivitas Manajemen Sarana Prasarana Sekolah, Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Efektivitas Pembelajaran Pada Sekolah Menengah Pertama Se Kota Sukabumi. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan, 17(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.17509/jap.v17i1.6430

Jik Cho, Y., & Poister, T. (2014). Managerial practices, trust in leadership, and performance: Case of the Georgia Department of Transportation. Public Personnel Management, 43(2), 179–196. doi:10.1177/0091026014523136

Jeddawi, Murtir H., (2012). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Yogyakarta: Total Media

Kartika, R., & Rediana, S. (2017). Efektifitas Komite Sekolah Sebagai Badan Pengawas Manajemen Keuangan Sekolah Pada Sma Negeri Se-Kota Semarang. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 6(2), 571–582.

Komariah, Aan dan Triana, Cepi. (2004). Visionary Leadership, Menuju Sekolah Efektif. Bandung : Bumi Aksara.

Maguire, M., Ball, S., & Braun, A. (n.d.). International Studies in Sociology of Education Behaviour , classroom management and student ‘ control ’: enacting policy in the English secondary school. (December 2014), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2010.503066

Maguire, M. (2007). Gender and movement in social policy. In The Sage handbook of gender and education, ed. C. Skelton, B. Francis and L. Smulyan, 109–24. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage.

Moja T, Hayward M. (1999). Higher Education Policy Development in Contemporary South Africa. From< http: //www.hsrc.ac.za.>

Naidu A, Joubert R, Mestry R, Mosoge J 2011. Educa- tion Management and Leadership: A South Afri- can Perspective. Cape Town: Oxford.

Nasution, S. (1988). Metode Penelitian Naturalistik Kualitatif. Tarsito. Bandung Tarsito.

Nuryatna, N. (n.d.). REORIENTASI PENDIDIKAN NASIONAL. VIII(2), 111–130.

Portilla, X. A., Ballard, P. J., Adler, N. E., Boyce, W. T., & Obradović, J. (2014). An integrative view of school functioning: Transactions between self-regulation, school engagement, and teacher-child relationship quality. Child Development, 85(5), 1915–1931. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12259

Rosyada, Dede. (2013). Paradigma Pendidikan Demokratis, Sebuah Model pelibatan Masyarakat dalam Pendidikan. Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Wolf J, Lang G, Beckett-Mount LL, Van Belle D. (1999). Where Policy Hits The Ground. Policy Implemen- tation Process in Malawi and Namibia. US Agency for International Development. SD Technical Pa- per No. 95

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v25i3.30914