THE LEGITIMACY OF PURI AGUNG KERAMBITAN TABANAN TOWARDS THE CULTURAL DEGRADATION CRISIS OF THE OKOKAN TRADITION
Abstract
The progress of the times has an impact on the behavior of memory decline regarding culture and profane values so that it has an impact on the ambiguity of the future of culture itself in this case is the tradition of the Okokan performance. This study aims to explore the role of power (legitimacy) of Puri Agung Kerambitan Tabanan on the Okokan Tradition to the cultural degradation that occurred. The method used in this study is a qualitative research method using two types of data sources, namely primary and secondary as well as data collection in the form of observations, interviews and literature studies (literature). Talcot Parson on Structural Functionalism was used in honing this research. Based on the data in the field, it was found that the role of the legitimacy or power of Puri Agung Kerambitan Tabanan was to first form a new group of the young generation of okokan art to be included in every event / activity of the castle. Second, support and take an active role in okokan performing arts groups. This role that has been carried out still requires an understanding strategy to be disseminated to meet the needs disposition. In line with Talcott Parson’s thinking that the disposition of needs can be achieved through a physical system (environment) and a personality system that can be done through socialization in the form of disseminating information through digital media and social control through awig-awig published by stakeholders, both Heritage Village and Puri Agung Kerambitan.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdullah, I. (2010). Konstruksi dan Reproduksi Kebudayaan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Agus Nero Sofyan, Kunto Sofianto, Maman Sutirman, D. S. (2021). Regenerasi Kearifan Lokal Kesenian Lebon Sebagai Budaya Leluhur Pangandaran, Jawa Barat. Sosiohumaniora, 23(2), 158–156.
Ananta Wikrama Tungga, Komang Ady Kurniawan Saputra, D. P. V. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Aris Agus, M. (2005). Istana Dewa Pulau Dewata : Makna Puri di Bali Abad 14-19. Jakarta: Komunitas Bambu.
Basuki, S. (2006). Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Wedatama Widya Sastra.
Bungin, B. (2011). Komunikasi : Teori, Paradigma, dan Diskursus Teknologi Komunikasi di Masyarakat. Jakarta: Kencana.
Colin, M. (2010). Propraganda Prints : A History of Art in The Service of Social and Politic Change. London: A&C Black Publisher.
Dymitrow, M. (2017). Degradation, restitution and the elusive culture of rural-urban thinking. International Journal of Geography, 195(1), 36–60.
Forlizzi, J. (2008). The Product Ecology: Understanding Social Product Use and Supporting Design Culture. Nternational Journal of Design, 2(1), 11–20.
Geertz, C. (1973). Myth, Symbol, and Culture. New York: Norton.
Graham, L. C. & A. (2019). The Measurement of Legitimacy: A Rush to Judgment? Asian Journal of Criminology, 14(4), 275–291.
Hermawan, E. (2001). Politik Membela yang Benar Teori Kritik dan Nalar. Yogyakarta: KLIK.
Ibrahim. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Karthadinata, D. M. (2017). Estetika Hindu dalam Kesenian Bali. Semarang: FBS Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Kincloch, G. C. (2009). Perkembangan dan Paradigma Utama Teori Sosiologi. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Marzali, A. (2005). Antropologi dan Pembangunan Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana.
Miles,M.B, Huberman,A.M dan J, S. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis, A Methods Sourcebooks (Edition 3). USA: Sage Publications.
Montgomery, B. &. (2000). Encyclopedia of Sociology. New York: Macmillan Publishing co. Inc.
Munir. (2008). Kurikulum Berbasis Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Silalahi, U. (2012). Metode Penelitian Sosial. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.
Sujatmika, A. T. H. dan E. (2012). Kamus Sosiologi. Surakarta: Aksara Sinergi Media.
Windutama, I. W. (2020). Komodifikasi Dalam Pengembangan Tradisi Okokan Sebagai Atraksi Wisata di Desa Kediri Tabanan. JUMPA, 6(2), 452–469.
Wulandari, R. (2020). The Okokan Tradition: Understanding Noble Value in the Frame of Symbolic Interactionism. IJASTE, 10(2), 74–85.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v24i3.37357
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Sosiohumaniora

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Sosiohumaniora Indexed By:
Creation is distributed below Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Published By:
Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran
Dean's Building 2nd Floor, Jalan Ir. Soekarno Km. 21 Jatinangor, Sumedang 45363
Email: jurnal.sosiohumaniorafisip@gmail.com