ECONOMIC RECOVERY OF FARMERS THROUGH DIGITAL PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY USING THE PISODAPUR PLATFORM AFTER THE CIANJUR EARTHQUAKE

Agung Edi Rustanto; Iis Kartini; Featy Octaviany; Wuwuh Andayani; Teguh Sandjaya

doi:10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v28i1.64342

ECONOMIC RECOVERY OF FARMERS THROUGH DIGITAL PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY USING THE PISODAPUR PLATFORM AFTER THE CIANJUR EARTHQUAKE

Agung Edi Rustanto, Iis Kartini, Featy Octaviany, Wuwuh Andayani, Teguh Sandjaya

Abstract

This study analyzes the economic recovery of farmers after the 2022 Cianjur earthquake through digital public service delivery using the PISODAPUR platform. It examines the platform's role in mapping disaster victims and economic losses, distributing aid, and supporting farmers' access to recovery services, while identifying implementation barriers. A qualitative case study was conducted through semi-structured interviews with 15 informants, field observations, and document analysis; the data were coded thematically using NVivo. The findings show that farmers' livelihoods have gradually improved, but recovery remains fragile because of damage to housing, livestock, agricultural land, and irrigation infrastructure. PISODAPUR has improved the reporting of victims' conditions, aid requests, data transparency, and coordination among stakeholders. Nevertheless, its direct contribution to agricultural economic recovery remains limited, particularly regarding market access, financing, and technology-based business redevelopment. Its effectiveness is further constrained by unstable internet connectivity, limited smartphone access, low digital literacy, and insufficient awareness among affected farmers. Community cooperation, assistance teams, and inter-agency coordination support implementation. The study concludes that PISODAPUR functions more effectively as a governance and coordination instrument than as a direct driver of farmers' economic recovery. Strengthening rural digital infrastructure, digital literacy, data verification, and agriculture-specific service features is therefore necessary.

Keywords

economic recovery; post-earthquake farmers; digital public service; PISODAPUR platform; qualitative case study

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdurrasyid, A., Darmawan, D. F., Juferta, F. F. T., Arare, K., Parangin-Angin, M., & Situmorang, R. A. (2023). Menjadi relawan kesehatan pada bencana gempa bumi Cianjur. E-DIMAS: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 14(1), 188-194. https://doi.org/10.26877/e-dimas.v14i1.14481

Badan Meteorologi, Klimatologi, dan Geofisika. (2022). Ulasan guncangan tanah akibat gempa barat daya Kabupaten Cianjur. https://www.bmkg.go.id/gempabumi/ulasan-guncangan-tanah/ulasan-guncangan-tanah-akibat-gempa-barat-daya-kabupaten-cianjur

Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research design: Pendekatan metode kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan campuran (4th ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.

Dargin, J. S., Fan, C., & Mostafavi, A. (2021). Vulnerable populations and social media use in disasters: Uncovering the digital divide in three major U.S. hurricanes. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 54, 102043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102043

Devinta, R. M., Muis, A., & Jokolelono, E. (2020). Analisis dampak sosial ekonomi pasca bencana di Desa Sibalaya Utara Kecamatan Tanambulava Kabupaten Sigi. Katalogis, 9(3), 216-225.

Houston, J. B., Spialek, M. L., Cox, J., Greenwood, M. M., & First, J. (2015). The centrality of communication and media in fostering community resilience: A framework for assessment and intervention. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(2), 270-283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764214548563

Kim, J., & Hastak, M. (2018). Social network analysis: Characteristics of online social networks after a disaster. International Journal of Information Management, 38(1), 86-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.08.003

Lai, C.-H., & Tang, T. (2021). Disaster communication behaviors in the U.S. and China: Which channels do you use and with whom? Journal of Applied Communication Research, 49(2), 207-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2021.1900588

Mahanani, E., Djuhardi, L., & Malays, E. (2024). Kajian tentang bencana dan dampak gempa bumi (Suatu pembelajaran pasca gempa bumi Cianjur, Jawa Barat). IKRA-ITH ABDIMAS, 8(3), 246-253. https://doi.org/10.37817/ikra-ithabdimas.v8i3.4115

Moleong, L. J. (2014). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi revisi). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nugroho, S. P., & Sulistyorini, D. (2019). Komunikasi bencana: Membedah relasi BNPB dengan media. Pusat Data, Informasi dan Hubungan Masyarakat, Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana.

Purwanto, D., Permadi, D. D., Saputri, U. S., Aditiawarman, U., Handayani, D. O. D., & Dewi, D. A. (2023). Kajian tentang bencana dan dampak gempa bumi di Cianjur bersama mahasiswa teknik sipil Nusaputra. Jurnal Abdi Nusa, 3(1), 36-39. https://doi.org/10.52005/abdinusa.v3i1.130

Qotrunada, T. E., Andoyo, R., & Wulandari, E. (2024). Post-earthquake food security analysis in Cugenang Subdistrict, Cianjur District, Indonesia. E3S Web of Conferences, 495, 03008. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202449503008

Rahardjo, M. (2017). Studi kasus dalam penelitian kualitatif: Konsep dan prosedurnya. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang.

Sapanli, K., Ismail, A., Nuva, Pramudita, D., Ramdani, I., Putro, F. A. D., Septiani, N. N., Azzahra, S. A., Zuhdirabbani, G., Arifin, S. D., Putra, A. H., & Sudrajat, D. R. (2023). Strategi pemulihan sektor pertanian pasca gempa bumi di Kabupaten Cianjur. Policy Brief Pertanian, Kelautan, dan Biosains Tropika, 5(2), 578-582. https://doi.org/10.29244/agro-maritim.0502.578-582

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v28i1.64342