Mendobrak Dominasi Sejarah: Upaya Laboratorium Banten Girang (LBG) dalam Mengenalkan Kembali Sejarah Pra-Islam dan Tinggalannya di Banten
Abstract
Banten has experienced long chronological history that shaped its society’s culture today. This study discusses activities by a community named “Laboratorium Banten Girang” (known as LBG) in Serang, Banten. The community aims at introducing a non-dominant history in Banten, and at the same time promote it as cultural heritage into the public space. In this study, the history of Banten presented in two sections; dominant and non-dominant history. Data in this study were collected through observation and in-depth interviews to members of the LBG, and residents living in the historical site of Banten. Results of this study suggests that LBG brings discourse outside the official or authorized discourse of the dominant history and try to introduce the other side of the story of Banten history; dating back to pre-Islamic history and its heritage. In their activities, the LBG do not aim to repair or to beautify the existing heritage and history, but they reintroduce it through various activities instead. Their effort receive diverse responses from society both rejection and acceptance. Meanwhile, the discourse carried by LBG indirectly serves as a non-physical revitalization project on cultural heritage and an effort to realize the ideas of the advancement of Banten’s culture.
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Ayatrohaedi. (1995). Banten Sebelum Islam. Dalam Banten Kota Pelabuhan Jalan Sutra. Jakarta: CV Dwi Jaya Karya.
Byrne, D. (2008). Heritage Conservation as Social Action. Dalam R. Harrison, J. Jameson, dan J. Schofield (Eds.), The Cultural Heritage Reader. London: Routledge.
Cortesão, A. (2018). The Suma Oriental of Tomé Pires. Dalam The Suma Oriental of Tomé Pires. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
Dewi, D. I. K. (2015). Pemanfaatan Ruang Terbuka Publik Berdasarkan Gaya Hidup di Kota Semarang. Conference on Urban Studies and Development.
Fairclough, N. (2001). The Discourse of New Labour: Critical Discourse Analysis. Dalam M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, dan S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis. London: Sage.
Gasani, M. El. (2019). Pemberdayaan Ma-syarakat melalui Kegiatan Seni di Komunitas Celah-Celah Langit (KCCL). Umbara, 4(1), 1–14.
Geismar, H. (2015). Anthropology and Heritage Regimes. Annual Review of Anthropology, 44, 71-85.
Guillot, C., Nurhakim, L., Wibisono, S., Adhyatman, S., dan École française d’Extrême-Orient. (1997). Banten Sebelum Zaman Islam: Kajian Arkeologi di Banten Girang (932?-1526). Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Hadiyanta, I. E. (2017). Arti Penting Membangun Pembelajaran Pelestarian Cagar Budaya. Dalam Dinamika Pelestarian Cagar Budaya (pp. 53–56). Yogyakarta: Ombak.
Hajer, M. (1996). Discourse Coalitions and the Institutionalisation of Practice: The Case of Acid Rain in Britain. Dalam F. Fischer dan J. Forester (Eds.), The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham: Taylor & Francis.
Hall, S. (2001). Foucault: Power, Knowledge and Discourse. Dalam M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader. London: Sage.
Halwany, M., dalam Chudari, A. M. (1993). Catatan Masa Lalu Banten. Serang: Sausara.
Hariana, K. (2017). Banten Canang Sari sebagai Identitas Budaya Bali dalam Pewarisan Pendidikan Estetika dan Ecoart di Sulawesi Tengah. Seminar Nasional Seni Dan Desain 2017, 58–68. Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Harrison, R. (2010). What is Heritage. Dalam R. Harrison (Ed.), Understanding the Politics of Heritage. London: Manchester University Press.
Hodder, I. (1999). The Archaeological Process, an Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hoed, B. H. (2016). Amnesia Budaya sebagai Gejala Krisis dalam Kebudayaan Indonesia. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Howard, P. (2003). Heritage: Management, Interpretation, Identity. London: Continuum.
Humaeni, A. (2016). Akulturasi Islam dan Budaya Lokal dalam Magi Banten. Serang: Bantenologi.
Kelley, D. R. (1998). Faces of History: Historical Inquiry from Herodotus to Herder. New Conn: Yale University Press.
Marbun, J. (2016). Model Partisipasi Publik dalam Pelestarian Situs Biting, Lumajang, Jawa Timur. Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Prabowo, D. A., dan Ma’ruf, M. F. (2016). Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pengembangan Cagar Budaya sebagai Ruang Publik: Studi Kasus Gedung Balai Pemuda Kota Surabaya. Publika, 4(11).
Sayer, A. (1984). Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach. London: Hutchinson.
Smith, L. (2006). Uses of Heritage. London: Routledge.
Spiridon, P., dan Sandu, I. (2015). Conservation of Cultural Heritage: from Participation to Collaboration. ENCATC Journal of Cultural Management and Policy, 5(1), 43–52.
Sucipto, T., dan Limbeng, J. (2007). Studi tentang Religi Masyarakat Baduy Desa Kanekes Provinsi Banten. Jakarta: Departemen Kebudayaan dan Pariwisata Direktorat Jenderal Nilai Budaya Seni dan Film-Direktorat Kepercayaan terhadap Tuhan Yang Maha Esa.
Taniardi, P. N. (2013). Video (berbasis) Komunitas: Sebuah Alternatif Penelitian Arkeologi Partisipatif. Dalam A. Sumijati dan P. Tjahjono (Eds.), Arkeologi dan Publik. Yogyakarta: Kepel Press.
Tanudirjo, D. A. (2003). Warisan Budaya untuk Semua: Arah Kebijakan Pengelolaan Warisan Budaya di Indonesia di Masa Mendatang. Kongres Kebudayaan V, Bukittinggi.
Tihami, H. M. A. (2018). Potret Budaya Banten Dulu, Kini, dan Nanti. Dikutip dari http://bantenologi.uinbanten.ac.id/?p=218.
Tuan, Y.-F. (1977). Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis: Univeristy of Minnesota Press.
UNESCO Office in Brazil. (n.d.). Heritage: Legacy from the Past to the Future. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/brasilia/culture/world-heritage/heritage-legacy-from-past-to-the-future/,
Wetherell, M. (2001). Introduction. Dalam M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. Yates (Eds.), Discourse Theory and Practice. London: Sage.
Wiana, I. K. (2007). Tri Hita Karana Menurut Konsep Hindu. Surabaya: Paramita.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/umbara.v5i2.25504
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.