E ISSN
SUBJEK “YANG-POLITIK”: MENAFSIR SUBJEK POLITIK PADA PASCA-MARXISME ERNESTO LACLAU
Abstract
Penelitian ini berusaha menguak pengartian subjek politik dalam pasca-Marxisme Ernesto Laclau. Subjek politik di dalam pasca-Marxisme direpresentasikan melalui subjek emansipatif yang akan membawa politik emansipasi. Melalui studi pustaka, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa pengartian subjek politik dalam pasca-Marxisme sangat berbeda dengan Marxisme. Perdebatan-perdebatan ontologis antara Marxisme dan pasca-Marxisme, bahkan di tubuh pasca-Marxisme mengenai “subjek” tersaji di dalam artikel ini. Secara lebih spesifik, pasca-Marxisme Laclau memadukan budaya psikoanalisis Lacan dan pasca-strukturalisme Derrida. Hal tersebut berimplikasi pada pengubahan pengartian atas “subjek”. Tradisi psikoanalisis Lacan digunakan untuk mengartikan kerentanan subjek bahwa ia tidak pernah dalam keadaan penuh. Sementara, tradisi pasca-strukturalisme Derrida digunakan untuk melakukan dekonstruksi atas tradisi-tradisi Marxisme strukturalis. Penggunaan dua tradisi tersebut tidak hanya berpengaruh pada pengartian atas subjek, ia juga berpengaruh terhadap perdebatan metode dalam melakukan emansipasi. Kunci dari pengartian subjek dalam pasca-Marxisme secara luas adalah subjek yang tidak pernah penuh.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Akmal, R. (2018). Melawan Takdir: Subjektivitas Pramoedya Ananta Toer dalam Perspektif Psikoanalisis-Historis Slavoj Zizek. Yogyakarta: Octopus.
Ardianto, H. T. (2016). Mitos Tambang Untuk Kesejahteraan: Pertarungan Wacana Kesejahteraan dalam Kebijakan Pertam-bangan. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Polgov.
Claviez, T. (2019). Where are Jacques and Ernesto when You Need Them? Ranciere and Laclau on Populism, experts and contingency. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 1132–1143.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. California: Sage Publication.
Filc, D., & Ram, U. (2014). Marxism after postmodernism: Rethinking the Emanci-patory Political Subject. Current Sociology, 62, (3), 295-313.
Flisfeder, M. (2016). Reading Emancipation Backwards: Laclau, Žižek and the Critique of Ideology in Emancipatory Politics. International Journal of Zizek Studies, 2, (1), 1-22.
Geras, N. (1988). Ex-Marxism without substance. New Left Review, 169, 34-62.
Hadiz, V., & Robinson, R. (2017). Competing Populism in Post-Authoritarian in Indonesia. International Political Science Review, 38, (4), 488-502.
Hall, S., & Jacques, M. (1989). New Times: The Changing Face of Politics in the 1990s. London: Verso.
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2004). Multitude: War and Democracy in The Age of Empire. New York: The Penguin Press.
Harrison, O. (2014). Revoluntionary Subjectivity in Post-Marxist Thought: Laclau, Negri, Badiou. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Company.
Hill, P. (2002). Lacan Untuk Pemula. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Hudson, P. (2006). The Concept of the Subject in Laclau. Politikon: South African Journal of Political Studies, 33, (3), 299-312.
Hutagalung, D. (2004). Hegemoni, Kekuasaan, dan Ideologi. Diponegoro 74: Jurnal Pemikiran Sosial, Politik, dan Hak Asasi Manusia , 12.
Hutagalung, D. (2008). Hegemoni dan Demokrasi Radikal-Plural: Membaca Laclau dan Mouffe. In E. Laclau, Hegemoni dan Strategi Sosialis: Postmarxisme dan Gerakan Sosial Baru (pp. xiii-xIviii). Yogyakarta: ResistBook.
Kingsbury, D. V. (2016). From Populism To Protagonism (and Back?) in Bolivarian Venezuela: Rethinking Ernesto Laclau’s on Populist Reason. Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies, 495–514.
Lacan, J. (1977). Écrits: A Selection. London: Tavistock.
Laclau, E. (1990). New Reflection on The Revolution of Our Time. London: Verso.
Laclau, E. (1996). Emancipation(s). London: Verso.
Laclau, E. (2000). Identity and Hegemony: The Role of Universalitiy in the Constitution of Political Logics. In J. Butler, E. Laclau, & S. Zizek (Eds.), Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left (pp. 44-89). New York: Verso.
Laclau, E. (2000). Identity and Hegemony: The Role of Universality in the Constitution of Political Logics. In Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left (pp. 44-89). New York: Verso.
Laclau, E. (2005). On Populist Reason (1st ed.). London: Verso.
Laclau, E. (2006). Ideology and Post-Marxism. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11, (2), 103-114.
Laclau, E. (2006). Why Constructing a People Is the Main Task of Radical Politics. Critical Inquiry, 32, (4), 646-680.
Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.
Laclau, E., & Zac, L. (1994). Minding The Gap: The Subject of Politics. In E. Laclau (Ed.), The Making of Political Identities (pp. 11-39). New York: Verso.
Lipping, J. (2015). The hedgehog from the pampas: Ernesto Laclau and The Impossibility of Society. European Political Science, 271-276.
Manik, R. A. (2016). Hasrat Nano Riantirno dalam Cermin Cinta: Kajian Psikoanalisis Lacanian. Jurnal Poetika, 74-84.
Martin, J. (2013). Introduction: Democracy and Conflict in The Work of Chantal Mouffe. In J. Martin, Chantal Mouffe: Hegemony, Radical Democracy, and The Political (pp. 1-12). New York: Routledge.
McKean, B. L. (2016). Toward an Inclusive Populism? On the Role of Race and Difference in Laclau’s Politics. Political Theory, 1-24.
Mouffe, C. (1992). Citizenship and Political Identity. The Identity in Question, 61, 28-32.
Muller, M. (2012). Lack and jouissance in hegemonic the discourse identification with the state. Organization, 20, 279–298.
Salter, L. (2016). Populism as a fantasmatic rupture in the postpolitical order: integrating Laclau with Glynos and Stavrakakis. Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online, 1-17.
Seshadri, K. R. (2009). Other/alterity: Lacan and Agamben on ethics, the subject and desubjectification. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 65–73.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 333-339.
Stavrakakis, Y. (2007). The Lacanian Left. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Suryajaya, M. (2016). Materialisme Dialektis: Kajian Tentang Marxisme dan Filsafat Kontemporer (2 ed.). Yogyakarta: Resist Book.
Torfing, J. (1999). New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Zizek, and Mouffe (1 ed.). Massachusetts: Blackwell.
Wood, E. M. (1998). The Retreat From Class: A New “True” Socialism. London: Verso.
Zizek, S. (2000). Class Struggle or Postmodernism? Yes, Please! In J. Butler, E. Laclau, & S. Zizek (Eds.), Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left (pp. 90-135). New York: Verso.
Zizek, S. (2006). Against the Populist Temptation. Critical Inquiry, 32(3), 551-574.
Zizek, S. (2008). The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jwp.v4i2.22565
Copyright (c) 2019 Luthfian Haekal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
JWP (Jurnal Wacana Politik) Indexed By:
21.png)
Published By:
Departement of Political Science
Campus of Faculty of Social and Political Science
Universitas Padjajaran, Building D, 2nd floor
Jl. Raya Sumedang Km.21, Jatinangor, Sumedang
Creation is distributed below Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.