E ISSN
PRINT AND ONLINE NEWS REVIEWS DURING 2021 THAT INFLUENCE THE INDONESIAN DEMOCRACY INDEX IN BLITAR CITY
Abstract
This study aims to analyze news content in print and online media during 2021, which affects the Indonesian Democracy Index in Blitar City. The research subjects are news from January 1 to December 31, 2021, from the print media Radar Blitar and Memorandum, as well as online media from Bhirawa.com and Mayangkaranews.com. These four media have the highest number of readers in Blitar City. This study uses a qualitative method with a textual analysis approach and collects data through virtual searches, clippings, focus group discussions, and in-depth interviews. All Informants were determined based on the representation of the institutions contained in the measurement of the Indonesian Democracy Index. The results of a review of print and online news media during 2021 show that civil liberties, political rights, and democratic institutions in Blitar City show excellent performance.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Achmad, Z.A. (2009). Sikap Masyarakat Muslim Pelaku Yoga di Surabaya tentang Berita Fatwa MUI Haramkan Yoga. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 1(2), 111–120.
Achmad, Z.A. (2014). Perbandingan Sistem Pers dan Sistem Pers di Indonesia (2nd ed.). Surabaya: Lutfansah.
Achmad, Z.A. (2018). Data Indeks Demokrasi Indonesia (IDI) di Kota Blitar Tahun 2017. Surabaya: Indomedia Pustaka. Retrieved from https://id1lib.org/book/5783476/c7e282
Achmad, Z.A. (2020). Anatomi teori strukturasi dan ideologi jalan ketiga Anthony Giddens. Translitera: Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi Dan Studi Media, 9(2), 45–62.
Achmad, Z.A., Alamiyah, S.S., Juwito, J., Wahyudi, A., & Siswati, E. (2022). Review berita dan regulasi lokal pada indeks demokrasi indonesia di kota Blitar tahun 2020. AKUNTABEL, 19(2), 448–458. doi:10.29264/JAKT.V19I2.10977
Achmad, Z.A., & Ida, R. (2018). Etnografi Virtual Sebagai Teknik Pengumpulan Data dan Metode Penelitian. The Journal of Society & Media, 2(2), 130–145. doi:10.26740/jsm.v2n2.p130-145
Achmad, Z.A., Siswati, E. & Wahyudi, A. (2021). Data Indeks Demokrasi Indonesia Di Kota Blitar Tahun 2019. (Z. A. Achmad, Ed.). Surabaya: Sahaja. Retrieved from https://id1lib.org/book/11816586/e616ae
Achmad, Z.A., Siswati, E., Wahyudi, A., Alamiyah, S.S., & Juwito. (2021). Data Indeks Demokrasi Indonesia Kota Blitar Tahun 2020. (Z. A. Achmad & D. Nasution, Eds.). Surabaya: Sahaja. Retrieved from https://id1lib.org/book/17007252/b2e9c3
Ahnen, R. (2003). Between tyranny of the majority and liberty: The persistence of human rights violations under democracy in Brazil. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 22(3), 319–339. doi:10.1111/1470-9856.00080
Alamiyah, S.S., & Achmad, Z.A. (2015). The role of citizen journalism in creating public sphere in Indonesia. In ICoDA (pp. 162–167). Surabaya: FISIP Universitas Airlangga.
Bealey, F.W. (1999). The Blackwell Dictionary of Political Science. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Berry, R.S.Y. (1999). Collecting data by in-depth interviewing. In the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference. City One Shatin, Hongkong: University of Sussex at Brighton.
Beteille, A. (2000). Anarchy and Abuse of Power. Economic and Political Weekly, 35(10), 779–783. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4408989%0A
Béteille, A. (2011). The institutions of democracy. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(29), 75–84. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198080961.003.0001
blitarkota.go.id. (2021). Bakesbangpol dan PBD Kota Blitar Siapkan Indeks Demokrasi Indonesisa (IDI) 2020. Retrieved 12 March 2022, from https://www.blitarkota.go.id/id/berita/bakesbangpol-dan-pbd-kota-blitar-siapkan-indeks-demokrasi-indonesisa-idi-2020
Bollen, K. (1993). Liberal Democracy: Validity and Method Factors in Cross-National Measures. American Journal of Political Science, 37(4), 1207–1230. doi:10.2307/2111550
Boyce, A. & Neale, P. (2006). Conducting In-depth Interviews: A Guide for Designing and Conducting In-depth Interviews for Evaluation Input. Watertown: Pathfinder International. doi:10.1080/14616730210154225
Burch, K. (2006). How Toqueville’s Theory of the ‘Tyranny of the Majority’ Can Benefit Social Justice Pedagogies. Philosophical Studies in Education, 37, 45–54.
Case, W. (2002). Politics in Southeast Asia. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315029474
Case, W. (2004). New Uncertainties for an Old Pseudo-Democracy: The Case of Malaysia. Comparative Politics, 37(1), 83–104.
Cherif, B., Beetham, D., Beevi, J.M.F., Boye, A.-E.K., Mor, A. El, Kubiak, H., … Villoro, L. (1998). Democracy: Its Principles and Achievement. Geneva: Inter-Parliamentary Union.
Coppedge, M., & Reinicke, W.H. (1991). Measuring Polyarchy. In A. Inkeles (Ed.), On Measuring Democracy: Its Consequences and Concomitants (pp. 47–68). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. doi:10.1007/BF02716905
Dahl, R.A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.). (2005). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd.
Flick, U. (2014). An Introduction to Qualitative Research (5th ed.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Fuchs, C. (2018). Internet dan Perjuangan Kelas. In Buruh, Feminisme, Media Digital, dan Demokrasi: Sebuah Kumpulan Wawancara (pp. 33–42). Jakarta: IndoPROGRESS.
Gastil, J. (1993). Democracy in Small Groups: Participation, Decision Making, and Communication. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers.
Goncing, M.A., & Syahrul, F. (2021). Simulasi Wacana Media Dan Permainan Wacana Politik. Jurnal Politik Profetik, 9(1), 58–83. doi:10.24252/profetik.v9i1a4
Guion, L.A., Diehl, D.C., & Mcdonald, D. (2011). Conducting an In-depth Interview. Gainesville: The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Retrieved from www.aidsmark.org/ipc_en/pdf/manual/14_Research-
Haugaard, M. (2010). Democracy, Political Power, and Authority. Social Research, 77(4), 1049–1074.
Ikenberry, J., & Kupchan, C. (1990). Socialization and hegemonic power. International Organization, 44(3), 283–315. doi:10.1017/S002081830003530X
kemenkopolhukam. (2019, August 8). Kemenko Polhukam Beri Arahan & Apresiasi Indeks Demokrasi Indonesia di Jatim Meningkat. Retrieved 23 September 2022, from https://polkam.go.id/kemenko-polhukam-beri-arahan-apresiasi-indeks-demokrasi/
Macnamara, & R., J. (2005). Media content analysis: its uses, benefits and best practice methodology. Asia-Pacific Public Relations Journal, 6(1), 1–34.
McClelland, J.S. (2005). A History of Western Political Thought. A History of Western Political Thought. London and New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203980743
Prambadi, G.A. (2019). Kemenko Polhukam Apresiasi Naiknya Indeks Demokrasi di Jatim. Retrieved 16 September 2021, from https://nasional.republika.co.id/berita/pvyhcp456/kemenko-polhukam-apresiasi-naiknya-indeks-demokrasi-di-jatim
Rauf, M., Hidayat, S., Gismar, A.M., Mulia, S.M., & Parengkuan, A. (2009). Measuring Democracy in Indonesia: 2009 Indonesia Democracy Index. Jakarta.
Rauf, M., Mulia, S.M., Hidayat, S., & Gismar, A.M. (2020). Indeks Demokrasi Indonesia 2019: Dua Dekade Reformasi Potret Capaian dan Tantangan Konsolidasi Demokrasi. Jakarta Pusat: Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Politik, Hukum, dan Keamanan. Retrieved from http://ditpolkom.bappenas.go.id/v2/?page_id=325
Shoemaker, P.J., & Reese, S.D. (2013). Mediating the message in the 21st century: A media sociology perspective. New York and London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203930434
Siswati, E. (2018). Anatomi Teori Hegemoni Antonio Gramsci. Translitera : Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi Dan Studi Media, 5(1), 11–33. doi:10.35457/translitera.v5i1.355
Suwarko, A. (2014). Kuota Keterwakilan Perempuan dalam Rekruitmen Pengurus dan Caleg di DPW PAN Jawa Timur pada Pemilu 2014. Jurnal Review Politik, 04(01), 243–271. Retrieved from http://repository.unair.ac.id/80356/
UNDP Indonesia. (2009). Indonesian Democracy Index (IDI). Retrieved 16 November 2021, from https://www.id.undp.org/content/indonesia/en/home/operations/projects/democratic_governance/indonesian-democracy-index--idi--project.html
Wahyudi, A. (2013). PKS dan NU (Studi Kasus tentang Penguatan Jejaring PKS dalam Menembus Basis NU di Kabupaten Trenggalek dalam Pemilihan Umum 2009). Universitas Airlangga.
Wiranata, I. M. A., Mardliyah, S., & Achmad, Z. A. (2016). The Contestation of Discourses on Sustainable Development in the Controversy of Benoa Bay Reclamation. In ICoCSPA, FISIP, Universitas Airlangga. Surabaya: Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Airlangga. doi:978-602-18461-4-8
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jwp.v8i1.42101
Copyright (c) 2023 Zainal Abidin Achmad, Syifa Syarifah Alamiyah, Agus Wahyudi, Dinda Rizki Anita, Vieri Samuel Juliando Pakpahan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
JWP (Jurnal Wacana Politik) Indexed By:
21.png)
Published By:
Departement of Political Science
Campus of Faculty of Social and Political Science
Universitas Padjajaran, Building D, 2nd floor
Jl. Raya Sumedang Km.21, Jatinangor, Sumedang
Creation is distributed below Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.