E ISSN
SRIKANDI AND INDONESIA’S E-GOVERNMENT POLICY: SYSTEM RELIABILITY AND THE CRUCIAL ROLE OF POLITICAL COMMITMENT
Abstract
This study examines the implementation of the SRIKANDI e-government policy in Indonesia, focusing on six critical elements: information exchange, information security, citizen engagement, human resources, inter-agency services, and policy-related decision-making. Employing a qualitative research methodology, NVIVO software was used to conduct thorough data coding and content analysis. Data were collected through literature reviews, non-participant observations, in-depth interviews, and analysis of official government documents, ensuring robust triangulation and comprehensive understanding. The findings reveal significant challenges in information security, particularly with system vulnerabilities that pose risks to data integrity. The level of citizen engagement remains low, with existing regulations limiting public participation in the development and use of the G2G system. Human resource issues, especially in regional areas, highlight gaps in both technical skills and staffing adequacy. System reliability, a crucial discovery, emphasizes the need for stable microservices architecture and proper integration of blockchain technology development to ensure seamless operation. Moreover, political commitment emerges as the primary driver in policy-related decision-making, with clear discrepancies between regional leadership affecting implementation success. The study finds that stronger political will and alignment between government levels are necessary for realising SRIKANDI’s full potential. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of the complexities of e-government policy implementation in Indonesia. It offers key recommendations to address political alignment and technical infrastructure challenges, with broader implications for optimizing e-government policies in developing nations.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adu, P. (2019). A Step-by-Step Guide to Qualitative Data Coding (1st ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351044516
Aini, Y. N. (2023). Penerapan Aplikasi Sistem Informasi Kearsipan Dinamis Terintegrasi (SRIKANDI) di Badan Meteorologi, Klimatologi, dan Geofisika. Konferensi Nasional Ilmu Administrasi, 7(1). https://knia.stialanbandung.ac.id/index.php/knia/article/view/900
Albanese, G., Galli, E., Rizzo, I., & Scaglioni, C. (2021). Transparency, civic capital and political accountability: A virtuous relation? Kyklos, 74(2), 155–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12260
Amat, F., & Rodon, T. (2021a). Institutional commitment problems and regional autonomy: The Catalan case. Politics and Governance, 9(4), 439–452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i4.4607
Amat, F., & Rodon, T. (2021b). Institutional commitment problems and regional autonomy: The Catalan case. Politics and Governance, 9(4), 439–452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i4.4607
Apriliyanti, I. D., Kusumasari, B., Pramusinto, A., & Setianto, W. A. (2021). Digital divide in ASEAN member states: analyzing the critical factors for successful e-government programs. Online Information Review, 45(2), 440–460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-05-2020-0158
Arief, A., & Abbas, M. Y. (2021). Kajian Literatur (Systematic Literature Review): Kendala Penerapan Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik (SPBE). Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Elektro, 8(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.33387/protk.v8i1.1978
Bahari, K. M., & Frinaldi, A. (2023). Inovasi Pengolahan Arsip Dinamis Melalui Aplikasi SRIKANDI Di Kabupaten Solok. JIMPS: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah, 8(2), 874–879. DOI: https://jim.usk.ac.id/sejarah/article/view/25144
Berliner, D. (2014). The political origins of transparency. Journal of Politics, 76(2), 479–491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613001412
Börzel, T. A., Goltermann, L., Lohaus, M., & Striebinger, K. (2012). Roads to regionalism: Genesis, design, and effects of regional organizations. In Roads to Regionalism: Genesis, Design, and Effects of Regional Organizations. Ashgate Publishing Ltd. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84900597376&partnerID=40&md5=a93566f16b74f4a3c8d69cd409e9bb7b
Dai, R.H., Padiku, I.R., & Raupu, R. (2024). Penerapan Metode UTAUT Dalam Menganalisis Tingkat Kepuasan Pengguna Sistem Informasi Kearsipan Dinamis Terintegrasi (Srikandi). Digital Transformation Technology (Digitech), 4(1), 87–96. DOI: https://jurnal.itscience.org/index.php/digitech/article/view/3476
De Fine Licht, J. (2014). Transparency actually: How transparency affects public perceptions of political decision-making. European Political Science Review, 6(2), 309–330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773913000131
Denzin, N. K. (2009). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods (1st ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315134543
Devega, M., & Yuhelmi. (2023). Sosialisasi Aplikasi Srikandi Pada Kecamatan Sail Pekanbaru. J-COSCIS: Journal of Computer Science Community Service, 3(2), 120–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31849/jcoscis.v3i2.12927
Efthymiou, D. E. (2018). The Normative Value of Partisanship: When and Why Partisanship Matters. Political Studies, 66(1), 192–208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321717707401
Fresiliasari, O., & Suhardjo, Y. (2023). Interkoneksi Aplikasi Administrasi Perkantoran Dengan Aplikasi Pelayanan Perizinan Pemerintah Daerah. SOLUSI : Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Ilmu Ekonomi, 21(4), 811–825. DOI: https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/slsi.v21i4.7749
Hale, T., Angrist, N., Goldszmidt, R., Kira, B., Petherick, A., Phillips, T., Webster, S., Cameron-Blake, E., Hallas, L., Majumdar, S., & Tatlow, H. (2021). A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker). Nature Human Behaviour, 5(4), 529–538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8
Harianja, J. V., Safitri, S. T., & Manurung, L. (2023). Pengukuran Kesiapan Pengguna Website Srikandi Menggunakan Metode TRI (Technology Readiness Index). Journal of Information System Research (JOSH), 4(2), 723–729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47065/josh.v4i2.2986
Hassall, G. (2017). E-government policy processes at regional and national levels in the pacific: Actors, institutions and networks. In Public Administration and Information Technology (Vol. 27, pp. 55–87). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50972-3_3
Hendriyani, M., Sugiyono, & Riyanto, A. (2023). Prosedur Penanganan Surat Masuk Dan Surat Keluar Pada Subbagian Tata Usaha Di Pusat Jasa Kearsipan Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia. KOMPLEKSITAS: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Organisasi Dan Bisnis, 12(1), 8–14. https://ejurnal.swadharma.ac.id/index.php/kompleksitas/article/view/311
Hidayat, R. (2017). Political devolution: Lessons from a decentralized mode of government in Indonesia. SAGE Open, 7(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016686812
IMF. (2020). Fiscal Monitor, October 2020 Policies for the Recovery. International Monetary Fund.
Indonesia.go.id. (2022). 24.400 Aplikasi Milik Pemerintah Segera Disederhanakan. https://www.indonesia.go.id/g20/kategori/kabar-terkini-g20/5335/24-400-aplikasi-milik-pemerintah-segera-disederhanakan?lang=1
Inspektorat ANRI. (2024). Audit Kinerja SRIKANDI 2021-2023.
Keefer, P. (2011). Collective action, political parties, and pro-development public policy. Asian Development Review, 28(1), 94–118. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-79959589190&partnerID=40&md5=46681154d3e6e077a5a5f1b3d948bd47
Kementerian Kominfo. (2020). Penerapan SPBE dan Rencana Pembangunan Pusat Data Nasional. https://aptika.kominfo.go.id/2020/10/penerapan-spbe-dan-rencana-pembangunan-pusat-data-nasional/
Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika. (2022, October 3). Signifikan, Hasil Survei e-Government Indonesia Naik 11 Peringkat. https://aptika.kominfo.go.id/2022/10/signifikan-hasil-survei-e-government-indonesia-naik-11-peringkat/. https://aptika.kominfo.go.id/2022/10/signifikan-hasil-survei-e-government-indonesia-naik-11-peringkat/
Kementerian PANRB. (2018). Atasi Inefisiensi Anggaran, Perpres E-Government Diteken Presiden. https://menpan.go.id/site/berita-terkini/atasi-inefisiensi-anggaran-perpres-e-government-diteken-presiden
Kementerian PANRB. (2020). Dua Bidang Quick Wins SPBE Telah Diluncurkan. https://menpan.go.id/site/berita-terkini/dua-bidang-quick-wins-spbe-telah-diluncurkan
Kementerian PANRB. (2021). Kementerian PANRB Dorong Pembangunan Sistem Aplikasi Terpadu. https://www.menpan.go.id/site/berita-terkini/kementerian-panrb-dorong-pembangunan-sistem-aplikasi-terpadu
Kementerian PPN/Bappenas RI. (2021). Manajemen Data SPBE Menentukan Kualitas Data Indonesia | Kementerian PPN/Bappenas. https://www.bappenas.go.id/id/berita/manajemen-data-spbe-menentukan-kualitas-data-indonesia-dCwPn
Khadija, M. A., Dwi Jayanti, I. S., Kartikasari, H., & Nimah, F. U. (2024). Bimbingan Tata Kelola Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik (SPBE) Bidang Kearsipan: Tinjauan Sistem Informasi Kearsipan Dinamis Terintegrasi (SRIKANDI). Bubungan Tinggi: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 6(1), 28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20527/btjpm.v6i1.9812
Kompas.com. (2022). Sri Mulyani Keluhkan 24.000 Aplikasi Pemerintah Bikin Boros Anggaran, Menkominfo: Akan Ditutup . https://money.kompas.com/read/2022/07/12/140407226/sri-mulyani-keluhkan-24000-aplikasi-pemerintah-bikin-boros-anggaran-menkominfo
Kurniawan, A. (DJKN, K. (2021). Pelaksanaan PPKM dalam Penanganan Kasus COVID-19 dan Evaluasinya. Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Negara, Kementerian Keuangan RI. https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/kpknl-semarang/baca-artikel/14314/Pelaksanaan-PPKM-dalam-Penanganan-Kasus-COVID-19-dan-Evaluasinya.html
Matitah, M., Arifin, S., Sumarto, S., & Widiyanto, W. (2021). Confronting e-Government Adoption in Indonesian Local Government. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 6(2), 279–306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v6i2.47795
Tejado, L.M., & Pano, E. (2018). Modelling local autonomy and dependence through cooperative relations. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 31(4), 410–425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-01-2017-0013
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Mutiarin, D., Rukmana, N. S., & Ningtyas, T. (2024). Bridging the digital divide through digital infrastructure. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(8). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i8.6817
Nur, A., Mohi, N. Z. A., Tuloli, M. S., & Muthia. (2023). Analisis Aplikasi SRIKANDI Menggunakan Metode TAM. DIFFUSION: Journal of System And Information Technology, 3(2), 214–223. https://ejurnal.ung.ac.id/index.php/diffusion/article/view/21188
Pamoragung, A., Suryadiand, K., & Ramdhani, M. A. (2006). Enhancing the implementation of e-Government in indonesia through the high-quality of virtual community and knowledge portal. Proceedings of the European Conference on E-Government, ECEG, 341–348. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84871668123&partnerID=40&md5=f868104ae8d6f1d7cbe59b43c05938dd
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice (4th ed.). SAGE. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/qualitative-research-evaluation-methods/book232962#description
Peters, B. G. (2017). INSTITUTIONS AND VOTING BEHAVIOR. In The Routledge Handbook of Elections, Voting Behavior and Public Opinion (pp. 41–53). Taylor and Francis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315712390-5
Puentes-Poloche, M., Rincón, A. G., & Cala-Vitery, F. (2023). Study about the implementation of E-government and digital government policies from the G2G approach: systematic review. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 15(3), 214–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2023.133578
Putri, M. E., Sensuse, D. I., Mishbah, M., & Prima, P. (2020). E-government inter-organizational integration: Types and success factors. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 216–221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3378936.3378955
Rahmah, F., & Meirinawati. (2023). Penerapan Electronic Government Melalui Sistem Informasi Kearsipan Dinamis Terintegrasi (SRIKANDI) Di Dinas Perpustakaan Dan Kearsipan Kota Probolinggo. Publika: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 11(3), 2341–2350. https://doi.org/https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/publika/article/view/54805
Rahmah, S., Museliza, V., Suryadi, N., & Rahayu, S. W. (2024). Management Of Archives At The Pekanbaru City Personnel And Human Resources Development Agency Service. Management Studies and Entrepreneurship Journal, 5(1), 3081–3087. https://www.yrpipku.com/journal/index.php/msej/article/view/4475/2475
Rahman, A. (2015). Toward a comprehensive conceptualization of digital divide and its impact on e-government system success. Advances in Business Marketing and Purchasing, 23A, 291–488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1069-096420150000023003
Ristiawati, L. A. R. (2019). The Urgency Of Creating Regional Regulations For Supporting The Implementation Of Regional Autonomy. Syariah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pemikiran, 19(1), 75–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18592/sjhp.v19i1.2652
Rose, M. (2004). Democratizing information and communication by implementing e-government in Indonesian regional government. International Information and Library Review, 36(3), 219–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2004.10762638
Rubasundram, G. A., & Rasiah, R. (2019). Corruption and good governance: An analysis of ASEAN’s E-governance experience. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 36(1), 57–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1355/ae36-1f
Sabani, A., Deng, H., & Thai, V. (2019). Evaluating the development of E-government in Indonesia. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 254–258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3305160.3305191
Sanco, S., Harmein, N., & Rahim, M. (2019). Integrated Model Development in Information Technology Adoption. In A. Y. Ali (Ed.), IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 505, Issue 1). Institute of Physics Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/505/1/012126
Schakel, A. H., & Brown, A. J. (2022). Dissecting Public Opinion on Regional Authority: Four Types of Regionalists Based on Citizens’ Preferences for Self-Rule and Shared Rule. Publius, 52(2), 310–328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjab020
Tambunan, D. (2023). The intervention of oligarchy in the Indonesian legislative process. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 8(2), 637–653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20578911231159395
Thijssen, P. (2015). Explaining vote choices of the young: Contextually embedded issues and stakes. In Political Engagement of the Young in Europe: Youth in the crucible (pp. 29–48). Taylor and Francis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315685090-11
Ufen, A. (2018). Party presidentialization in post-Suharto Indonesia. Contemporary Politics, 24(3), 306–324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2017.1413499
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2022). E-Government Survey 2022: The Future of Digital Government. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2022
Wagola, R., Nurmandi, A., & Subekti, D. (2023). Government Digital Transformation in Indonesia. In C. Stephanidis, M. Antona, S. Ntoa, & G. Salvendy (Eds.), Communications in Computer and Information Science: Vol. 1835 CCIS (pp. 286–296). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36001-5_37
Yogopriyatno, J., & Roeliana, L. (2024). Kesiapan Implementasi Sistem Informasi Kearsipan Dinamis Terintegrasi (SRIKANDI) Di Kota Bengkulu. Jurnal Administrasi Dan Kesekretarisan, 9(1), 31–44. http://www.journal.starki.id/index.php/JAK/article/view/1125
Ypi, L. (2016). Political commitment and the value of partisanship. American Political Science Review, 110(3), 601–613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000319
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jwp.v10i1.57854
Copyright (c) 2025 Tubagus Zaki Zakaria
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
JWP (Jurnal Wacana Politik) Indexed By:
21.png)
Published By:
Departement of Political Science
Campus of Faculty of Social and Political Science
Universitas Padjajaran, Building D, 2nd floor
Jl. Raya Sumedang Km.21, Jatinangor, Sumedang
Creation is distributed below Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.