E-GOVERNMENT UTILIZATION AND THE POLITICAL LOGIC OF NETWORK GOVERNANCE IN INDONESIA’S LOCAL ADMINISTRATION
Abstract
This article investigates the utilization of E-Government applications within the framework of network governance in Indonesia’s local administration. Drawing on both qualitative and quantitative methods, this study captures public perceptions of electronic information-based government services and explores the political and institutional dynamics underlying their implementation. Data were collected through questionnaires, document analysis, interviews, and focus group discussions (FGDs) with purposively selected informants, including leaders and staff from local government institutions. The findings demonstrate that e-government platforms enhance service efficiency, transparency, and public satisfaction. Moreover, these applications promote openness in financial management and intra-organizational communication, contributing to greater trust and comfort among citizens. Framed within the theory of network governance, the study reveals how digital service delivery is not merely a technical process but a political one—shaped by inter-institutional collaboration, administrative adaptability, and the evolving role of the state in a digitally mediated environment. These insights affirm the growing necessity of integrating digital infrastructure with political and organizational readiness to achieve effective and sustainable governance in the digital age.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahmad, N., Waqas, M., & Zhang, X. (2021). Public Sector Employee Perspective towards Adoption of E-Government in Pakistan: A Proposed Research Agenda. Data and Information Management, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/dim-2020-0029
Aljazzaf, Z. M., Al-Ali, S. A., & Sarfraz, M. (2020). E-participation model for kuwait e-government. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 2. https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2020.0110226
Almehmadi, F. M. (2020). Factors Influencing the Adoption and Use of Information Technologies: EGovernment in Developing Countries. Scientific Journal of King Faisal University, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.37575/b/cmp/2379
Androniceanu, A., Kinnunen, J., & Georgescu, I. (2020). E-government clusters in the eu based on the gaussian mixture models. Administratie Si Management Public, 2020(35). https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2020.35-01
Aranyossy, M. (2022). User adoption and value of e-government services (Citizen-centric empirical study from Hungary). Acta Oeconomica, 72(4). https://doi.org/10.1556/032.2022.00032
Baillieu, R., Hoang, H., Sripipatana, A., Nair, S., & Lin, S. C. (2020). Impact of health information technology optimization on clinical quality performance in health centers: A national cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE, 15(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236019
Castro, C., & Lopes, C. (2022). Digital Government and Sustainable Development. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00749-2
Choi, H., Park, M. J., Rho, J. J., & Zo, H. (2016). Rethinking the assessment of e-government implementation in developing countries from the perspective of the design–reality gap: Applications in the Indonesian e-procurement system. Telecommunications Policy, 40(7). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2016.03.002
Dhaoui, I. (2022). E-Government for Sustainable Development: Evidence from MENA Countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00791-0
Guo, J. X. (2019). Measuring information system project success through a software-assisted qualitative content analysis. Information Technology and Libraries, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v38i1.10603
Guo, Q., Cann, B., McClement, S., Thompson, G., & Chochinov, H. M. (2016). Keep in touch (KIT): Perspectives on introducing internet-based communication and information technologies in palliative care. BMC Palliative Care, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-016-0140-5
Gupta, A., Suri, P. K., & Singh, R. K. (2019). Analyzing the Interaction of Barriers in E-Governance Implementation for Effective Service Quality: Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach. Business Perspectives and Research, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2278533718800562
Hernández-Dionis, P., Pérez-Jorge, D., Curbelo-González, O., & de la Rosa, O. M. A. (2022). The Coordinator of Information and Communication Technologies: Its Implication for Open Innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010042
Husain, M. N., Ahmad Rizal, A. R., Jalil, A., & Basrudin, B. (2025). ‘Kaombo Ohusii’ as a Means of Development Communication: Uncovering Widow Forest Management Practices in Buton District, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 41(1), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2025-4101-12
Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government. Information Systems Management, 29(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740
Kennedy, E., Jafari, A., Stamoulis, K. G., & Callens, K. (2020). The first Programmefood and nutrition security, impact, resilience, sustainability and transformation: Review and future directions. In Global Food Security (Vol. 26). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100422
Khatoon, A., Verma, P., Southernwood, J., Massey, B., & Corcoran, P. (2019). Blockchain in energy efficiency: Potential applications and benefits. Energies, 12(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/en12173317
Komar, J., Chow, J. Y., Kawabata, M., & Choo, C. Z. Y. (2022). Information and Communication Technology as an enabler for implementing Nonlinear Pedagogy in Physical Education: Effects on students’ exploration and motivation. Asian Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsep.2022.02.001
Kulkarni, V., Sahoo, S. K., Thanikanti, S. B., Velpula, S., & Rathod, D. I. (2021). Power systems automation, communication, and information technologies for smart grid: A technical aspects review. Telkomnika (Telecommunication Computing Electronics and Control), 19(3). https://doi.org/10.12928/TELKOMNIKA.v19i3.16428
Lim, D., Norman, R., & Robinson, S. (2020). Consumer preference to utilise a mobile health app: A stated preference experiment. PLoS ONE, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229546
Mandičák, T., Mésároš, P., & Spišáková, M. (2021). Impact of information and communication technology on sustainable supply chain and cost reducing of waste management in slovak construction. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147966
Nam, H., Kim, S., & Nam, T. (2022). Identifying the Directions of Technology-Driven Government Innovation. Information (Switzerland), 13(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/info13050208
Nofal, M. I., Al-Adwan, A. S., Yaseen, H., & Alsheikh, G. A. A. (2021). Factors for extending e-government adoption in Jordan. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v9i2.1824
Oliveira, T. A., Oliver, M., & Ramalhinho, H. (2020). Challenges for connecting citizens and smart cities: ICT, e-governance and blockchain. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072926
Pavlichev, A. (2004). The E-Government Challenge for Public Administration. In Digital Government. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/9781591401223.ch018
Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum015
Schulz, K., & Feist, M. (2021). Leveraging blockchain technology for innovative climate finance under the Green Climate Fund. Earth System Governance, 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2020.100084
Smallwood, R. F. (2014). Information Governance: Concepts, Strategies, and Best Practices. In Wiley.
Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2005). The democratic anchorage of governance networks. In Scandinavian Political Studies (Vol. 28, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2005.00129.x
Street, C. (2001). Declaration of Principles For Sustainable and Integrated Solid Waste Management ( SISWM ) By Sandra Cointreau ,. Waste Management.
Toleikienė, R., Juknevičienė, V., & Rybnikova, I. (2022). Electronic leadership at local self-government: conceptual analysis and literature review. Public Policy and Administration, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.21.1.29709
Trung, N. Q., & Van Thanh, N. (2022). Evaluation of Digital Marketing Technologies with Fuzzy Linguistic MCDM Methods. Axioms, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11050230
Zyberi, I., & Luzo, D. (2022). The Relationship between satisfaction, Trust and loyalty in Electronic banking. Finance: Theory and Practice, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2022-26-2-104-117
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jwp.v10i3.62691
Copyright (c) 2025 Dewi Anggraini, Faturachman Alputra Sudirman, Nur Atnan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
JWP (Jurnal Wacana Politik) Indexed By:
Published By:
Departement of Political Science
Campus of Faculty of Social and Political Science
Universitas Padjajaran, Building D, 2nd floor
Jl. Raya Sumedang Km.21, Jatinangor, Sumedang
Creation is distributed below Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.