Governance Deficits and Social Engineering Strategies in Community-Owned Enterprises: Evidence from Pulosari Village, Indonesia
Abstrak
This study explores governance deficits within Community-Owned Enterprises (BUMW) and proposes social engineering strategies to enhance their sustainability. This qualitative case study employed interviews, observations, and document analysis involving key stakeholders of Pulosari Village-owned enterprise. The research focuses on five key governance pillars: institutional autonomy, citizen participation, transparency and accountability, local innovation, and digital integration. Social engineering strategies in this study refer to participatory and institutional governance interventions designed to strengthen organizational sustainability. The findings reveal persistent challenges, including limited legal recognition, participation that is more ceremonial than substantive, weak financial transparency, and minimal adoption of innovation and digital tools. These shortcomings undermine public trust, reduce community ownership, and threaten long-term viability. To address these issues, the study suggests several social engineering strategies, such as strengthening legal status, creating more inclusive decision-making forums, promoting participatory financial oversight, establishing local innovation incubators, and advancing community-based digitalization. Beyond contributing to public administration scholarship by situating BUMW within a governance framework, the study also offers practical recommendations for policymakers and community actors to improve accountability, inclusiveness, and sustainability.
Kata Kunci
Teks Lengkap:
PDF (English)Referensi
Amalputra, H. P. F., Nurasa, H., Kombaitan, B., & Ningrum, S. (2023). Collaborative Governance in the Bandung Basin Urban Area: A Case Study of Bandung Basin Urban Management Agency. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v6i2.45619
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Antlöv, H., Wetterberg, A., & Dharmawan, L. (2016). Village Governance, Community Life, and the 2014 Village Law in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 52(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2015.1129047
Aritenang, A. (2021). The Role of Social Capital on Rural Enterprises Economic Performance: A Case Study in Indonesia Villages. SAGE Open, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211044178
Arnstein, S. R. (2019). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 85(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2018.1559388
Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2012). From Engagement to Co-production: The Contribution of Users and Communities to Outcomes and Public Value. Voluntas, 23(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9309-6
Chambers, R. (1995). Poverty and livelihoods: whose reality counts? Uner Kidrar dan Leonard Silk (eds), People : Form Impoverishment to Empowerment. Environment and Urbanization, 7(1).
D’albuquerque, R. (2024). Dimensions of Local Decision-Making Capacity, Institutional Design and Coordination Mechanisms: The Spaces of Autonomy in Brazilian Municipalities. Caderno CRH, 36. https://doi.org/10.9771/ccrh.v36i0.53666
Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2010). Conceptions of Social Enterprise and Social Entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and Divergences. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 32–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420670903442053
Escher, T., & Rottinghaus, B. (2024). Effects of online citizen participation on legitimacy beliefs in local government. Evidence from a comparative study of online participation platforms in three German municipalities. Policy and Internet, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.371
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. In Annual Review of Environment and Resources (Vol. 30). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
Gelderblom, D. (2018). The limits to bridging social capital: Power, social context and the theory of Robert Putnam. Sociological Review, 66(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026118765360
Haesevoets, T., Roets, A., Van Severen, R., Dierckx, K., & Verschuere, B. (2023). The public’s preferred level of involvement in local policy-making. Scientific Reports, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34282-w
Jarmara, T. (2023). Robert Putnam: Trust as a Fundamental Element of Civil Society and Democratic Governance. Filozofia, 78(1). https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2023.78.1.2
Johnson, C. (2008). Arresting development: The power of knowledge for social change. In Arresting Development: The power of knowledge for social change. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203086018
Kariuki, P., Adeleke, J. A., & Ofusori, L. O. (2020). The role of open data in enabling fiscal transparency and accountability in municipalities in Africa: South Africa and Nigeria case studies. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/3428502.3428558
Kasumaningrum, Y., Azis, Y., Saefullah, K., & Siregar, A. Y. M. (2024). Investigating the Impact of Social Capital, Cross-Sector Collaboration, and Leadership on Social Innovation in Rural Social Enterprises. Journal of Human, Earth, and Future, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.28991/HEF-2024-05-01-09
Kushendar, D. H. (2023). Implementation Of Public Housing Management Policy: A Case Study In Rusunawa Of Cimahi, West Java, Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v7i1.47689
Lemanski, C. (2017). Unequal citizenship in unequal cities: participatory urban governance in contemporary South Africa. International Development Planning Review, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2017.2
Lincoln, Y. S., Guba, E. G., & Pilotta, J. J. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
Malhotra, C., Anand, R., & Soni, V. (2020). Creating Public Services 4.0: Sustainable Digital Architecture for Public Services in India. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 66(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0019556120957421
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
Michael, B., & Bates, M. (2011). Implementing and Assessing Transparency in Digital Government. In Electronic Government Strategies and Implementation. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-348-7.ch002
Nanda, S., & Warrier, U. (2023). Socio-Managerial Framework of Health Governance: Empirical Evidence from India’s National Sanitation Program (SBM-G). Journal of Health Management, 25(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/09720634221150998
OECD, O. (2005). The OECD principles of corporate governance. Contaduría y Administración, 216. https://doi.org/10.22201/fca.24488410e.2005.562
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0002
Rai, S. K. (2022). Issues, challenges, and ways ahead to develop citizen-centric e-Governance in Nepal. Journal of Management and Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.3126/jmds.v31i01.52852
Shisanya, C. A., & Khayesi, M. (2007). How is climate change perceived in relation to other socioeconomic and environmental threats in Nairobi, Kenya? Climatic Change, 85(3–4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9321-9
Tarlani, T., Dariah, A. R., & Rani, A. M. (2022). Transforming Rural Economy Through Community-Based Tourism with Village-Owned Enterprise (BUMDES, Badan Usaha Milik Desa) - A Case Study: Cibiru Wetan, Pagerwangi and Cipamekar Villages, Indonesia. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 17(5). https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.170517
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. In Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research (Vol. 53, Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.1177/109634809702100108
Yu, P. (2022). Diffusion of Innovation theory. In Implementation Science: The Key Concepts. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003109945-16
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v10i1.67134
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.
Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik Indexed By:


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

















21.png)



.png)